Approximately 30% of patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) develop delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) or delayed cerebral infarction.6,21,24 These complications of SAH are recognized as the most important reasons for poor outcome; hence, considerable effort is devoted to monitoring and preventing their occurrence or mitigating their effect during hospital admission.6,21,24 There is a growing realization that DCI and delayed cerebral infarction have a complex pathophysiology involving the interaction of multiple mechanisms that are the subject of intense research.2,16 Women have a disproportionately higher incidence of intracranial aneurysms than men, particularly after the menopausal period, an indication that sex-specific factors may mediate, in part, the formation of intracranial aneurysms, and likely by extension the pathogenesis of SAH.
Clinical studies have identified a number of predictors of DCI and cerebral infarction.3 There are limited data regarding the effect of sex, and the available evidence has been contradictory. In this study, we investigated the relationship of sex to DCI and delayed cerebral infarction. The study may help improve knowledge about the pathophysiology of DCI and delayed cerebral infarction, or contribute to better risk assessment for delayed complications after SAH.
Methods
Study Population
After receiving approval from the institutional review board of St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, we selected studies from the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) data repository that used nimodipine as a standard treatment and reported DCI (“delayed cerebral ischemia” or “therapeutic hypertension” or “delayed ischemic neurological deficit”) or cerebral infarction (“cerebral infarction”). The repository contains data of multiple clinical trials and observational prospective databases regarding aneurysmal SAH. Ten data sets were selected, including those of the British Aneurysm Nimodipine trial (BRANT); Clazosentan to Overcome Neurological Ischemia and Infarction Occurring After SAH (CONSCIOUS-1); University of Washington Database of Subarachnoid Treatment (D-SAT); Acute systemic erythropoietin therapy to reduce delayed ischemic deficits following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and effects of acute treatment with statins on cerebral autoregulation in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage trials (EPO_STATIN); Heinrich Heine University Concomitant Intraventricular Fibrinolysis and Low-Frequency Rotation After Severe Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Trial (HHU); Intraoperative Hypothermia for Aneurysm Surgery Trial (IHAST); Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (IMASH) trial; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT); Kurashiki Central Hospital, Japan; and Columbia University Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcomes Project (SHOP). The objective and structure of the SAHIT database has been reported previously.12,17
Study Parameters
Based on the current knowledge about factors predicting DCI and cerebral infarction, the following variables were selected for analysis: sex, age, neurological status at admission (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies [WFNS] grade23), amount of subarachnoid blood seen on the initial CT scan (Fisher grade7), smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, hydrocephalus, history of hypertension, location and size of aneurysm, and treatment modality (coiling or clipping).3–5,8,14,16,20,25 To study the effect of menopausal status on DCI and cerebral infarction, we created a dummy variable, “status,” as a surrogate for menopausal status using age cutoff ≤ 55 years or > 55 years. This age cut point was based on previous studies.1,19 Therefore, 4 groups were analyzed: men ≤ 55 years, men > 55 years, women ≤ 55 years, and women > 55 years. The primary outcome of interest was DCI, and the secondary outcome was delayed cerebral infarction, as defined by each individual data set (Supplemental Table).
Statistical Analysis
First, the data were examined descriptively, with categorical variables expressed as counts with percentages and continuous variables described as means with standard deviations. Binary logistic regression models were fitted to obtain the unadjusted odds ratios associated with the effect of sex in each study, and the resultant odds ratios were then pooled using a random-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Where the pooled unadjusted odds ratios were statistically significant, further adjusted analysis was performed to account for the effects of age, admission WFNS grade, and the fixed effect of study. We also performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of DCI and infarction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The analysis was performed using Stata software (version 13.1, StataCorp).
Results
A pooled cohort of 6713 patients was analyzed, 4406 (65%) of whom were women. The study cohort characteristics are shown in Table 1. Women were on average older and had a higher incidence of a premorbid history of hypertension. The other variables were comparably distributed between sexes. The incidence of DCI was statistically higher in women than in men (20% vs 16%, p = 0.001); similarly, the incidence of infarction was higher in women than in men (16% vs 14%, p = 0.001). A meta-analysis of the pooled unadjusted odds ratios (Fig. 1) indicated that women had a significantly higher risk of DCI in the pooled cohort (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15–1.52), and also a higher risk of infarction (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01–1.52), than men. In a model adjusting for age, WFNS grade, and fixed effect of study, the risk difference remained statistically significant for DCI (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.12–1.48), but not for infarction (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.98–1.40). The between-study heterogeneity was statistically not significant (I2: DCI = 0.0%, p = 0.53; infarct = 14.8%, p = 0.31). Table 2 shows the analysis of the effect of menopausal status on DCI and infarct. The median age of women who were ≤ 55 years was 45 years (interquartile range [IQR] 39–50 years); those > 55 years had a median age of 65 years (IQR 59–72 years). We found no difference in the risk of DCI when comparing women ≤ 55 years to their counterparts who were > 55 years (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74–1.02; p = 0.08). The risk of DCI was significantly lower in men who were ≤ 55 years and in those > 55 years, in comparison with women ≤ 55 years. No difference in DCI risk was found on comparing men ≤ 55 years to those > 55 years (p = 0.38). We did a sensitivity analysis using the age cut point of 50 years and found no difference in the risk of DCI between women who were younger than 50 years compared with those who were older than 50 years (p = 0.41). The risk of infarction did not differ statistically between the sexes when analyzed based on an age cut point of 55 years.
Baseline characteristics of patients in the pooled data set
Variable | Men | Women |
---|---|---|
No. of patients | 2306 | 4406 |
Mean age in yrs ± SD | 50.8 ± 12.9 | 55.2 ± 13.8 |
Hypertension | 549 (33) | 1407 (39) |
WFNS grade | ||
I | 1279 (50) | 2143 (45) |
II | 633 (25) | 1317 (27) |
III | 175 (7) | 330 (7) |
IV | 266 (10) | 572 (12) |
V | 231 (9) | 453 (9) |
Fisher grade | ||
1 | 185 (8) | 275 (6) |
2 | 474 (21) | 908 (21) |
3 | 1061 (46) | 2130 (49) |
4 | 589 (26) | 1008 (23) |
Aneurysm location | ||
ACA | 1131 (53) | 1439 (34) |
ICA | 420 (20) | 1437 (34) |
MCA | 408 (19) | 863 (21) |
PC | 180 (8) | 451 (11) |
Aneurysm diameter in mm | ||
0–12 | 1794 (83) | 3662 (86) |
13–24 | 199 (9) | 350 (8) |
≥25 | 157 (7) | 235 (6) |
Aneurysm treatment | ||
Clip | 1462 (67) | 2943 (69) |
Coil | 731 (33) | 1333 (31) |
DCI | 375 (16) | 879 (20) |
Delayed cerebral infarct | 236 (14) | 562 (16) |
ACA = anterior cerebral artery; ICA = internal carotid artery; MCA = middle cerebral artery; PC = posterior circulation.
The table does not include missing data. Values are presented as the number of patients (%) unless stated otherwise.
Forest plot of unadjusted odds ratios showing the effect of sex on DCI and infarcts in the different studies. See Methods for explanation of included studies.
Effect of hormonal status on DCI and infarcts
Variable | Median Age in Yrs (IQR) | DCI* | p Value | Infarctions* | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Women | |||||
≤55 yrs | 45 (39–50) | Reference | Reference | ||
>55 yrs | 65 (59–72) | 0.87 (0.74–1.02) | 0.08 | 1.01 (0.82–1.24) | 0.93 |
Men | |||||
≤55 yrs | 44 (37–50) | 0.75 (0.62–0.90) | 0.002 | 0.81 (0.64–1.03) | 0.09 |
>55 yrs | 61 (57–68) | 0.72 (0.59–0.90) | 0.003 | 0.96 (0.73–1.25) | 0.76 |
Data are presented as OR (95% CI).
Table 3 presents results from the multivariable model after including all predictor variables in Table 1. The variables that were independently associated with DCI were WFNS grade (p < 0.001), Fisher grade (p < 0.001), patient age (p = 0.025), and sex (p = 0.007). Independent predictors of infarction included WFNS grade, Fisher grade, and aneurysm size.
Multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of DCI and infarcts
Variable | DCI* | p Value | Infarction* | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 1.00 (0.98–1.01) | 0.025 | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.662 |
Female sex | 1.38 (1.09–1.74) | 0.007 | 1.02 (0.81–1.30) | 0.842 |
Hypertension | 1.06 (0.86–1.31) | 0.5803 | 0.91 (0.72–1.13) | 0.377 |
WFNS grade | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
I | Reference | Reference | ||
II | 1.87 (1.40–2.49) | 1.74 (1.27–2.38) | ||
III | 3.05 (1.89–4.93) | 3.05 (1.82–5.13) | ||
IV | 3.03 (2.28–4.02) | 3.28 (2.42–4.44) | ||
V | 2.04 (1.44–2.88) | 3.84 (2.73–5.41) | ||
Fisher grade | <0.001 | 0.003 | ||
1 | Reference | Reference | ||
2 | 0.89 (0.53–1.50) | 2.38 (1.37–4.15) | ||
3 | 1.97 (1.22–3.18) | 2.48 (1.44–4.26) | ||
4 | 1.51 (0.89–2.54) | 2.94 (1.66–5.22) | ||
Aneurysm location | 0.07 | 0.059 | ||
ACA | Reference | Reference | ||
ICA | 0.79 (0.61–1.01) | 1.22 (0.93–1.59) | ||
MCA | 0.82 (0.62–1.08) | 0.79 (0.58–1.07) | ||
PC | 0.67 (0.48–0.94) | 1.11 (0.79–1.54) | ||
Aneurysm diameter (mm) | 0.466 | 0.003 | ||
0–12 | Reference | Reference | ||
13–24 | 1.23 (0.88–1.72) | 1.59 (1.14–2.21) | ||
≥25 | 0.98 (0.58–1.68) | 1.79 (1.10–2.92) | ||
Aneurysm treatment | 0.303 | 0.354 | ||
Clip | Reference | Reference | ||
Coil | 0.87 (0.67–1.14) | 0.88 (0.66–1.16) |
Values are presented as OR (95% CI).
Discussion
This study demonstrated a significantly higher risk of DCI in women than in men. Our finding is in consonance with the results of an aggregate-data meta-analysis by De Rooij et al. to identify predictors of DCI following aneurysmal SAH.3 The risk difference of 29% in our study is comparable with the 30% estimated in their meta-analysis (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6). Taken together, the available evidence suggests that sex plays some role in the pathogenesis of DCI, although we are uncertain as to which factors mediate this effect. In our present study, the women were older and presented in poorer clinical condition compared with their male counterparts; however, these factors had only marginal impact on the magnitude of the effect of sex on DCI, suggesting little or no role for the primary brain injury in mediating the observed risk difference between men and women. Previous studies have reported sex-related differences in aneurysm morphology that could provide a mechanistic explanation for the higher likelihood of DCI in women than in men.9 It has been shown that women tend to have a higher prevalence of internal carotid artery aneurysms and that men tend to have a higher prevalence of anterior cerebral artery aneurysms, including anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Lindekleiv et al., using computational fluid dynamic simulation, showed that women have much narrower vessel diameters and higher blood flow velocity that results in higher wall shear stress in the middle cerebral artery and internal carotid artery bifurcations.15 Higher wall stress could induce endothelial injury and altered vascular reactivity leading to perfusion deficits and the development of ischemia.
Furthermore, we investigated a putative role for female hormonal status, considering evidence from prior studies suggesting that sex and age interact to influence the risk of SAH, probably acting through a sex-specific hormonal factor.22 Menopause typically occurs between the ages of 50 and 59 years when estrogen levels begin to decrease. The higher prevalence of ruptured aneurysms in women compared with men is more pronounced in the postmenopausal period, probably because of loss of the protective effect of estrogen on vascular endothelium and smooth muscle integrity during this period. Estrogen regulates a number of inflammatory cascades and contributes to vascular wall integrity.22 The dysregulation of these mechanisms has been implicated in the pathogenesis of DCI.16,22 We did not find an association between menopausal status and DCI risk in the present study. It is possible that the arbitrary age cut point we used was a crude and insensitive marker of menopausal status. A better approach would have been to directly measure estrogen levels. Furthermore, some studies have suggested that the mechanism by which estrogen influences aneurysm pathogenesis may be related to the fluctuation rather than the absolute deficiency in estrogen levels.22
Although a significant relation of sex to cerebral infarction was seen in the pooled odds ratios, the statistical significance was lost after adjusting for other covariates in the analysis. This is in contrast to the relationship between sex and DCI, which remained significant in the multivariable analysis. Multiple mechanisms have been implicated to mediate the occurrence of cerebral infarction after SAH, ischemia being one among the many putative pathways. Cerebral infarction due to DCI is now thought to be a better prognostic factor for functional outcome than DCI alone.6,21,24 Although a number of studies have identified predictors of DCI and cerebral infarction, our study is most likely one of the largest series. We demonstrated the impact of the primary injury and SAH clot burden in the pathogenesis of DCI and infarct formation after SAH. While the aneurysm size was the more relevant additional predictor for infarct formation, age and sex were more relevant additional predictors of DCI. Indeed, previous studies have identified multiple predictors, including those indicative of the severity of the primary injury and SAH clot burden, modifiable risk factors related to lifestyle habits, or the secondary complications of the aneurysm, including vasospasm, hydrocephalus requiring drainage, and elevated intracranial pressure. In the meta-analysis of de Rooij et al. involving 52 studies that evaluated 33 potential predictors of DCI, the most robust evidence was found for a history of cigarette smoking (pooled OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1–1.4).3 The other predictors identified included hyperglycemia, hydrocephalus, diabetes mellitus, and early systemic inflammatory response syndrome. In a recent study of 632 patients who were managed in a single center, predictors of early cerebral infarction were identified and included Hunt and Hess Grades IV and V (OR = 2.06, p = 0.008), Fisher Grades 3 and 4 (OR = 3.99, p = 0.014), sustained elevations of intracranial pressure > 20 mm Hg (OR 5.95, p < 0.0001), and early vasospasm on diagnostic angiography (OR 3.01, p = 0.008).10 In a related paper, the authors reported a risk score for cerebral infarction (BEHAVIOR score) based on 7 independent predictors identified at multivariable analysis, including Fisher grade of SAH clot, patient age ≥ 55 years, Hunt and Hess grade, acute hydrocephalus requiring external CSF drainage, vasospasm on initial angiography, intracranial pressure greater than 20 mm Hg, and treatment of multiple aneurysms.11 In addition, Kanamaru et al. recently published their post hoc analysis of predictors for cerebral infarction in 579 patients in the Prospective Registry of Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment (PRESAT).13 The predictors were Fisher Grade 3 on admission, larger aneurysm dome size, ruptured posterior circulation aneurysms, premature aneurysm rupture during the clipping procedure, symptomatic vasospasm, and infection.
Because of missing data, we could not examine a number of the important factors identified in previous studies. This is especially true for cigarette smoking, as this was a strong predictor in the study of de Rooij et al.3 Moreover, there were variations in the definition of variables, for example, vasospasm, which necessitated the exclusion. The selection of the outcome parameters DCI and delayed cerebral infarction was based on the definitions of the included studies, which could have caused heterogeneity. It is noteworthy that all trials included in the SAHIT data repository were investigating a treatment for DCI or delayed cerebral infarction. Some of these treatments did reduce DCI or delayed cerebral infarction, which could have biased the results of our study. Furthermore, we were not able to retrieve data on hormone replacement therapy, although this might have influenced the risk of DCI. In menopausal women, hormone replacement therapy appears to reduce the risk of aneurysmal SAH but is not associated with improvement in outcome.18 Its relationship to DCI is unknown. Finally, the ratio of treatment modalities in our study is in favor of surgical clipping. The current ratio between clipping and coiling is more toward the latter, which is associated with less risk of DCI.4,5,8 Theoretically, this increased use of coiling will lead to a lower incidence of DCI in current aneurysmal SAH populations, which might have an impact on the sex differences. Despite these limitations, our study has some strengths worth highlighting. This study is quite likely the largest series to study DCI and cerebral infarction after SAH. We also achieved a good case mix by the inclusion of prospective studies and databases from multiple regions, including Europe, Asia, Australia, and North America, which make the results of this study more generalizable than those of prior studies.
Conclusions
The present study indicated that female sex is associated with a higher risk of DCI, and thus sex may play a role in the pathogenesis of DCI but was not associated with menopausal status. Other sex-specific factors may be involved, and we could not fully rule out the influence of hormonal changes on DCI and infarct formation after SAH. The study has identified the predictors of DCI and cerebral infarction in a very large cohort reflecting experience from multiple institutions.
Acknowledgments
We thank Marc Settino and Winnie Qian (both working at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada) for their assistance in development of the data collection protocol and data extraction.
Appendix
SAHIT Collaborators
Walter van den Bergh: Department of Intensive Care, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands; Nima Etminan: Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Daniel Hanggi: Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; David Hasan: The Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver School of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; S. Claiborne Johnston: Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, Texas; Peter Kirkpatrick: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Peter Le Roux: MLHC Brain & Spine Center at Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania; Stephan Mayer: Institute for Critical Care Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Andrew Molyneux: The Manor Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; Adam Noble: Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health & Society, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom; John Pickard: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Audrey Quinn: The General Infirmary, Leeds, United Kingdom; Karl Schaller: Service of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland; Thomas Schenk: Department of Neurology, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany; Tom Schweizer: Keenan Research Centre of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Julian Spears: Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Michael Todd: Department of Anesthesia, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; James Torner: Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; Ming-Yuan Tseng: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Mervyn Vergouwen: Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands; and George Wong: Department of Surgery, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.
Disclosures
Dr. Macdonald states that he is Chief Scientific Officer of Edge Therapeutics Inc., is a consultant for Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., has direct stock ownership in Edge Therapeutics, receives non–study-related clinical/research support, and has ownership in the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and the Brain Aneurysm Foundation.
Author Contributions
Conception and design: Germans, de Oliveira Manoel, Macdonald. Acquisition of data: Germans, Cohen. Analysis and interpretation of data: Germans, Jaja, Cohen. Drafting the article: Germans, Jaja, de Oliveira Manoel. Critically revising the article: all authors. Reviewed submitted version of manuscript: Germans, Jaja, Macdonald. Approved the final version of the manuscript on behalf of all authors: Germans. Statistical analysis: Jaja. Study supervision: Macdonald.
Supplemental Information
Previous Presentations
Portions of this work were presented in poster form at the EANS2016 Congress, September 4–8, 2016, Athens, Greece.
Online-Only Content
Supplemental material is available with the online version of the article.
Supplemental Table. https://thejns.org/doi/suppl/10.3171/2017.3.JNS162808.
References
- 1↑
Algra AM, Klijn CJ, Helmerhorst FM, Algra A, Rinkel GJ: Female risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. Neurology 79:1230–1236, 2012
- 2↑
Budohoski KP, Guilfoyle M, Helmy A, Huuskonen T, Czosnyka M, Kirollos R, et al.: The pathophysiology and treatment of delayed cerebral ischaemia following subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 85:1343–1353, 2014
- 3↑
de Rooij NK, Rinkel GJ, Dankbaar JW, Frijns CJ: Delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review of clinical, laboratory, and radiological predictors. Stroke 44:43–54, 2013
- 4↑
Dorhout Mees SM, Kerr RS, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, Molyneux AJ: Occurrence and impact of delayed cerebral ischemia after coiling and after clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). J Neurol 259:679–683, 2012
- 5↑
Dumont AS, Crowley RW, Monteith SJ, Ilodigwe D, Kassell NF, Mayer S, et al.: Endovascular treatment or neurosurgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: effect on angiographic vasospasm, delayed ischemic neurological deficit, cerebral infarction, and clinical outcome. Stroke 41:2519–2524, 2010
- 6↑
Etminan N, Vergouwen MD, Macdonald RL: Angiographic vasospasm versus cerebral infarction as outcome measures after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir Suppl 115:33–40, 2013
- 7↑
Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM: Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6:1–9, 1980
- 8↑
Germans MR, Macdonald RL: Clip or coil-is some of the effect on outcome related to the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia? World Neurosurg 82:e679–e681, 2014
- 9↑
Horikoshi T, Akiyama I, Yamagata Z, Sugita M, Nukui H: Magnetic resonance angiographic evidence of sex-linked variations in the circle of Willis and the occurrence of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 96:697–703, 2002
- 10↑
Jabbarli R, Reinhard M, Niesen WD, Roelz R, Shah M, Kaier K, et al.: Predictors and impact of early cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Eur J Neurol 22:941–947, 2015
- 11↑
Jabbarli R, Reinhard M, Roelz R, Shah M, Niesen WD, Kaier K, et al.: Early identification of individuals at high risk for cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: the BEHAVIOR score. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 35:1587–1592, 2015
- 12↑
Jaja BN, Attalla D, Macdonald RL, Schweizer TA, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, et al.: The Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) Repository: advancing clinical research in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 21:551–559, 2014
- 13↑
Kanamaru K, Suzuki H, Taki W: Cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acta Neurochir Suppl 121:167–172, 2016
- 14↑
Li H, Pan R, Wang H, Rong X, Yin Z, Milgrom DP, et al.: Clipping versus coiling for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 44:29–37, 2013
- 15↑
Lindekleiv H, Sandvei MS, Njølstad I, Løchen ML, Romundstad PR, Vatten L, et al.: Sex differences in risk factors for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a cohort study. Neurology 76:637–643, 2011
- 16↑
Macdonald RL: Delayed neurological deterioration after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Nat Rev Neurol 10:44–58, 2014
- 17↑
Macdonald RL, Cusimano MD, Etminan N, Hanggi D, Hasan D, Ilodigwe D, et al.: Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists data repository (SAHIT). World Neurosurg 79:418–422, 2013
- 18↑
Mhurchu CN, Anderson C, Jamrozik K, Hankey G, Dunbabin D: Hormonal factors and risk of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an international population-based, case-control study. Stroke 32:606–612, 2001
- 19↑
Phipps AI, Ichikawa L, Bowles EJ, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, et al.: Defining menopausal status in epidemiologic studies: A comparison of multiple approaches and their effects on breast cancer rates. Maturitas 67:60–66, 2010
- 20↑
Reilly C, Amidei C, Tolentino J, Jahromi BS, Macdonald RL: Clot volume and clearance rate as independent predictors of vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 101:255–261, 2004
- 21↑
Rosengart AJ, Schultheiss KE, Tolentino J, Macdonald RL: Prognostic factors for outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 38:2315–2321, 2007
- 22↑
Tabuchi S: Relationship between postmenopausal estrogen deficiency and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Behav Neurol 2015:720141, 2015
- 23↑
Teasdale GM, Drake CG, Hunt W, Kassell N, Sano K, Pertuiset B, et al.: A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:1457, 1988
- 24↑
Vergouwen MD: Vasospasm versus delayed cerebral ischemia as an outcome event in clinical trials and observational studies. Neurocrit Care 15:308–311, 2011
- 25↑
Wilson DA, Nakaji P, Abla AA, Uschold TD, Fusco DJ, Oppenlander ME, et al.: A simple and quantitative method to predict symptomatic vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage based on computed tomography: beyond the Fisher scale. Neurosurgery 71:869–875, 2012