Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion

Clinical article

Marjan Alimi M.D.1, Christoph P. Hofstetter M.D., Ph.D.1, Guang-Ting Cong B.S.2, Apostolos John Tsiouris M.D.3, Andrew R. James M.B.B.S., F.R.C.S.1, Danika Paulo B.S.1, Eric Elowitz M.D.1, and Roger Härtl M.D.1
View More View Less
  • 1 Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery;
  • | 2 Department of Neuroradiology; and
  • | 3 Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF) is a popular technique for anterior fixation of the thoracolumbar spine. Clinical and radiological outcome studies are required to assess safety and efficacy. The aim of this study was to describe the functional and radiological impact of ELIF in a degenerative disc disease population with a longer follow-up and to assess the durability of this procedure.

Methods

Demographic and perioperative data for all patients who had undergone ELIF for degenerative lumbar disorders between 2007 and 2011 were collected. Trauma and tumor cases were excluded. For radiological outcome, the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and latest follow-up coronal Cobb angle, lumbar sagittal lordosis, bilateral foraminal heights, and disc heights were measured. Pelvic incidence (PI) and PI–lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch were assessed in scoliotic patients. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS), as well as the Macnab criteria.

Results

One hundred forty-five vertebral levels were surgically treated in 90 patients. Pedicle screw and rod constructs and lateral plates were used to stabilize fixation in 77% and 13% of cases, respectively. Ten percent of cases involved stand-alone cages. At an average radiological follow-up of 12.6 months, the coronal Cobb angle was 10.6° compared with 23.8° preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Lumbar sagittal lordosis increased by 5.3° postoperatively (p < 0.0001) and by 2.9° at the latest follow-up (p = 0.014). Foraminal height and disc height increased by 4 mm (p < 0.0001) and 3.3 mm (p < 0.0001), respectively, immediately after surgery and remained significantly improved at the last follow-up. Separate evaluation of scoliotic patients showed no statistically significant improvement in PI and PI-LL mismatch either immediately postoperatively or at the latest follow-up. Clinical evaluation at an average follow-up of 17.6 months revealed an improvement in the ODI and the VAS scores for back, buttock, and leg pain by 21.1% and 3.7, 3.6, and 3.7 points, respectively (p < 0.0001). According to the Macnab criteria, 84.8% of patients had an excellent, good, or fair functional outcome. New postoperative thigh numbness and weakness was detected in 4.4% and 2.2% of the patients, respectively, which resolved within the first 3 months after surgery in all but 1 case.

Conclusions

This study provides what is to the authors' knowledge the most comprehensive set of radiological and clinical outcomes of ELIF in a fairly large population at a midterm follow-up. Extreme lateral interbody fusion showed good clinical outcomes with a low complication rate. The procedure allows for at least midterm clinically effective restoration of disc and foraminal heights. Improvement in coronal deformity and a small but significant increase in sagittal lordosis were observed. Nonetheless, no significant improvement in the PI-LL mismatch was achieved in scoliotic patients.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; BMI = body mass index; DDD = degenerative disc disease; ELIF = extreme lateral interbody fusion; LL = lumbar lordosis; MCID = minimum clinically important difference; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PI = pelvic incidence; VAS = visual analog scale.

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $376.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Acosta FL, , Liu J, , Slimack N, , Moller D, , Fessler R, & Koski T: Changes in coronal and sagittal plane alignment following minimally invasive direct lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease in adults: a radiographic study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:9296, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Ahmadian A, , Deukmedjian AR, , Abel N, , Dakwar E, & Uribe JS: Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization. A review. J Neurosurg Spine 18:289297, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Anand N, , Baron EM, , Thaiyananthan G, , Khalsa K, & Goldstein TB: Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:459467, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Anand N, , Rosemann R, , Khalsa B, & Baron EM: Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E6, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Banagan K, , Gelb D, , Poelstra K, & Ludwig S: Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E687691, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Benglis DM, , Vanni S, & Levi AD: An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139144, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Beurskens AJ, , de Vet HC, , Köke AJ, , van der Heijden GJ, & Knipschild PG: Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20:10171028, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Billinghurst J, & Akbarnia BA: Extreme lateral interbody fusion – XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract 20:238251, 2009

  • 9

    Bono CM, , Khandha A, , Vadapalli S, , Holekamp S, , Goel VK, & Garfin SR: Residual sagittal motion after lumbar fusion: a finite element analysis with implications on radiographic flexion-extension criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:417422, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Cahill KS, , Martinez JL, , Wang MY, , Vanni S, & Levi AD: Motor nerve injuries following the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 17:227231, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Carreon LY, , Djurasovic M, , Glassman SD, & Sailer P: Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:892895, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Cummock MD, , Vanni S, , Levi AD, , Yu Y, & Wang MY: An analysis of postoperative thigh symptoms after minimally invasive transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:1118, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Dakwar E, , Cardona RF, , Smith DA, & Uribe JS: Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E8, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Eck JC: Minimally invasive corpectomy and posterior stabilization for lumbar burst fracture. Spine J 11:904908, 2011

  • 15

    Elowitz EH, , Yanni DS, , Chwajol M, , Starke RM, & Perin NI: Evaluation of indirect decompression of the lumbar spinal canal following minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: radiographic and outcome analysis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:201206, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Fairbank JC, , Couper J, , Davies JB, & O'Brien JP: The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271273, 1980

  • 17

    Farrar JT, , Portenoy RK, , Berlin JA, , Kinman JL, & Strom BL: Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain 88:287294, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Farrar JT, , Young JP Jr, , LaMoreaux L, , Werth JL, & Poole RM: Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94:149158, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Fritz JM, & Irrgang JJ: A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther 81:776788, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Galloway GM: Direct lateral transpsoas approach to interbody fusion—may be risky after all. J Clin Neurophysiol 28:605606, 2011

  • 21

    Guérin P, , Obeid I, , Gille O, , Bourghli A, , Luc S, & Pointillart V, et al.: Safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat 33:665671, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Hägg O, , Fritzell P, & Nordwall A: The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:1220, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Inoue S, , Watanabe T, , Hirose A, , Tanaka T, , Matsui N, & Saegusa O, et al.: Anterior discectomy and interbody fusion for lumbar disc herniation. A review of 350 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183 2231, 1984

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Isaacs RE, , Hyde J, , Goodrich JA, , Rodgers WB, & Phillips FM: A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S322S330, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Johnson RD, , Valore A, , Villaminar A, , Comisso M, & Balsano M: Pelvic parameters of sagittal balance in extreme lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disc disease. J Clin Neurosci 20:576581, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Karikari IO, , Nimjee SM, , Hardin CA, , Hughes BD, , Hodges TR, & Mehta AI, et al.: Extreme lateral interbody fusion approach for isolated thoracic and thoracolumbar spine diseases: initial clinical experience and early outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:368375, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Kepler CK, , Bogner EA, , Herzog RJ, & Huang RC: Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 20:550556, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Kepler CK, , Huang RC, , Sharma AK, , Meredith DS, , Metitiri O, & Sama AA, et al.: Factors influencing segmental lumbar lordosis after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 4:7175, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Kepler CK, , Sharma AK, & Huang RC: Lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LTIF) with plate fixation and unilateral pedicle screws: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:363367, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Kepler CK, , Sharma AK, , Huang RC, , Meredith DS, , Girardi FP, & Cammisa FP Jr, et al.: Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 16:329333, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Knight RQ, , Schwaegler P, , Hanscom D, & Roh J: Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:3437, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Kotwal S, , Kawaguchi S, , Lebl D, , Hughes A, , Huang R, & Sama A, et al.: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech [epub ahead of print], 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Lehmann TR, , Spratt KF, , Tozzi JE, , Weinstein JN, , Reinarz SJ, & el-Khoury GY, et al.: Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:97104, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Lubansu A: [Minimally invasive spine arthrodesis in degenerative spinal disorders.]. Neurochirurgie 56:1422, 2010. (Fr)

  • 35

    Macnab I: Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53:891903, 1971

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Madhok R, & Kanter AS: Extreme-lateral, minimally invasive, transpsoas approach for the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 12:347350, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    McAfee PC: Interbody fusion cages in reconstructive operations on the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:859880, 1999

  • 38

    Moller DJ, , Slimack NP, , Acosta FL Jr, , Koski TR, , Fessler RG, & Liu JC: Minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion and transpsoas approach-related morbidity. Neurosurg Focus 31:4 E4, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Oliveira L, , Marchi L, , Coutinho E, & Pimenta L: A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S331S337, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Ozgur BM, , Aryan HE, , Pimenta L, & Taylor WR: Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435443, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Park DK, , Lee MJ, , Lin EL, , Singh K, , An HS, & Phillips FM: The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:223228, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Pimenta L, , Díaz RC, & Guerrero LG: Charité lumbar artificial disc retrieval: use of a lateral minimally invasive technique. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 5:556561, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    Pimenta L, , Marchi L, , Oliveira L, , Coutinho E, & Amaral R: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing radiographic and clinical outcomes between stand-alone lateral interbody lumbar fusion with either silicate calcium phosphate or rh-BMP2. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74:343350, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44

    Pimenta L, , Oliveira L, , Schaffa T, , Coutinho E, & Marchi L: Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14:3845, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45

    Pumberger M, , Hughes AP, , Huang RR, , Sama AA, , Cammisa FP, & Girardi FP: Neurologic deficit following lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 21:11921199, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46

    Ray CD: Threaded fusion cages for lumbar interbody fusions. An economic comparison with 360 degrees fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:681685, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47

    Rodgers WB, , Gerber EJ, & Rodgers JA: Lumbar fusion in octogenarians: the promise of minimally invasive surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:26 Suppl S355S360, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48

    Schwab FJ, , Blondel B, , Bess S, , Hostin R, , Shaffrey CI, & Smith JS, et al.: Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E803E812, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49

    Sharma AK, , Kepler CK, , Girardi FP, , Cammisa FP, , Huang RC, & Sama AA: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year: a preliminary report. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:242250, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Shen FH, , Samartzis D, , Khanna AJ, & Anderson DG: Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am 38:373386, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51

    Smith JS, , Klineberg E, , Schwab F, , Shaffrey CI, , Moal B, & Ames CP, et al.: Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures: prospective analysis of operative and non-operative treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) [epub ahead of print], 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 52

    Terran J, , Schwab F, , Shaffrey CI, , Smith JS, , Devos P, & Ames CP, et al.: The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 73:559568, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Tohmeh AG, , Rodgers WB, & Peterson MD: Dynamically evoked, discrete-threshold electromyography in the extreme lateral interbody fusion approach. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 14:3137, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54

    Tormenti MJ, , Maserati MB, , Bonfield CM, , Okonkwo DO, & Kanter AS: Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E7, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 55

    Wagner WH, , Regan JJ, , Leary SP, , Lanman TH, , Johnson JP, & Rao RK, et al.: Access strategies for revision or explantation of the Charité lumbar artificial disc replacement. J Vasc Surg 44:12661272, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56

    Wang MY, & Mummaneni PV: Minimally invasive surgery for thoracolumbar spinal deformity: initial clinical experience with clinical and radiographic outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28:3 E9, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57

    Watkins RG IV, , Hanna R, , Chang D, & Watkins RG III: Sagittal alignment after lumbar interbody fusion: comparing anterior, lateral, and transforaminal approaches. J Spinal Disord Tech [epub ahead of print], 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 562 308 47
Full Text Views 481 45 1
PDF Downloads 416 45 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0