Segmental lumbar sagittal correction after bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Clinical article

Sharon C. Yson Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Sharon C. Yson in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Edward Rainier G. Santos Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Edward Rainier G. Santos in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Jonathan N. Sembrano Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and

Search for other papers by Jonathan N. Sembrano in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
David W. Polly Jr. Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and
Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for other papers by David W. Polly Jr. in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $384.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $624.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $384.00
USD  $624.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

In this paper the authors sought to determine the segmental lumbar sagittal contour change after bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Methods

Between March 2007 and October 2010, 42 consecutive patients (57 levels) underwent bilateral TLIF. Standard preoperative and 6-week postoperative standing lumbar spine radiographs were examined. Preoperative and postoperative segmental lordosis was determined by manual measurements using the Cobb method. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative values were calculated and analyzed for statistical significance.

Results

The mean preoperative segmental alignment was 8.1°. The mean postoperative alignment was 15.3°, with a mean correction of 7.2° per segment. The largest gain in lordosis was obtained at the L5–S1 level (10.1°). There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative values (p = 5 × 10−9). There was no significant difference in mean segmental correction between levels. Improvement in lordosis was higher in multilevel fusions (9.8°) than in single-level fusions (5.2°) (p = 0.047). There was an inverse correlation between preoperative sagittal lordosis measurement and change in lordosis (r = −0.599).

Conclusions

A significant improvement in lumbar lordosis can be gained by preforming bilateral facetectomies in TLIF with posterior compression. This procedure provides an additional option to a spine surgeon's armamentarium in dealing with significant lumbar sagittal plane deformities.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Bridwell KH, , Lenke LG, & Lewis SJ: Treatment of spinal stenosis and fixed sagittal imbalance. Clin Orthop Relat Res 384:3544, 2001

  • 2

    Cardoso MJ, & Rosner MK: Does the Wilson frame assist with optimizing surgical exposure for minimally invasive lumbar fusions?. Neurosurg Focus 28:5 E20, 2010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Faundez AA, , Schwender JD, , Safriel Y, , Gilbert TJ, , Mehbod AA, & Denis F, et al.: Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 18:203211, 2009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Glassman SD, , Berven S, , Bridwell K, , Horton W, & Dimar JR: Correlation of radiographic parameters and clinical symptoms in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:682688, 2005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Glassman SD, , Bridwell K, , Dimar JR, , Horton W, , Berven S, & Schwab F: The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:20242029, 2005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Gong K, , Wang Z, & Luo Z: Reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with posterior fixation versus transsacral cage fusion in situ with posterior fixation in the treatment of Grade 2 adult isthmic spondylolisthesis in the lumbosacral spine. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 13:394400, 2010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Goyal N, , Wimberley DW, , Hyatt A, , Zeiller S, , Vaccaro AR, & Hilibrand AS, et al.: Radiographic and clinical outcomes after instrumented reduction and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion of mid and high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:321327, 2009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Harrison DE, , Harrison DD, , Cailliet , Janik TJ, & Holland B: Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: centroid, Cobb, TRALL, and Harrison posterior tangent methods. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:E235E242, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hee HT, , Castro FP Jr, , Majd ME, , Holt RT, & Myers L: Anterior/posterior lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: analysis of complications and predictive factors. J Spinal Disord 14:533540, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Hong JY, , Suh SW, , Modi HN, , Hur CY, , Song HR, & Park JH: Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case-control study comparing 6 methods. Eur Spine J 19:15511557, 2010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Houten JK, , Post NH, , Dryer JW, & Errico TJ: Clinical and radiographically/neuroimaging documented outcome in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 20:3 E8, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hsieh PC, , Koski TR, , O'Shaughnessy BA, , Sugrue P, , Salehi S, & Ondra S, et al.: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine 7:379386, 2007

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Humphreys SC, , Hodges SD, , Patwardhan AG, , Eck JC, , Murphy RB, & Covington LA: Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:567571, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Jagannathan J, , Sansur CA, , Oskouian RJ Jr, , Fu KM, & Shaffrey CI: Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 64:955964, 2009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Javernick MA, , Kuklo TR, & Polly DW Jr: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: unilateral versus bilateral disk removal—an in vivo study. Am J Orthop 32:344348, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Lee P, & Fessler RG: Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults. J Clin Neurosci 19:111114, 2012

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lowe TG, , Tahernia AD, , O'Brien MF, & Smith DA: Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 15:3138, 2002

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Polly DW Jr, , Klemme WR, , Cunningham BW, , Burnette JB, , Haggerty CJ, & Oda I: The biomechanical significance of anterior column support in a simulated single-level spinal fusion. J Spinal Disord 13:5862, 2000

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Polly DW Jr, & Santos ERG, Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Resnick DK, , Haid RW Jr, & Wang JC: Surgical Management of Low Back Pain ed 2 New York, Thieme Medical Publishers, 2009. 104109

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Potter BK, , Freedman BA, , Verwiebe EG, , Hall JM, , Polly DW Jr, & Kuklo TR: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:337346, 2005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Rihn JA, , Makda J, , Hong J, , Patel R, , Hilibrand AS, & Anderson DG, et al.: The use of RhBMP-2 in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic analysis. Eur Spine J 18:16291636, 2009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Rihn JA, , Patel R, , Makda J, , Hong J, , Anderson DG, & Vaccaro AR, et al.: Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 9:623629, 2009

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Rosenberg WS, & Mummaneni PV: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery 48:569575, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Salehi SA, , Tawk R, , Ganju A, , LaMarca F, , Liu JC, & Ondra SL: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery 54:368374, 2004

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Sasso RC, , Best NM, , Mummaneni PV, , Reilly TM, & Hussain SM: Analysis of operative complications in a series of 471 anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:670674, 2005

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Villavicencio AT, , Burneikiene S, , Bulsara KR, & Thramann JJ: Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 19:9297, 2006

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Wang J, , Zhou Y, , Zhang ZF, , Li CQ, , Zheng WJ, & Liu J: Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2. Eur Spine J 19:17801784, 2010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Whitecloud TS III, , Roesch WW, & Ricciardi JE: Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 14:100103, 2001

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1932 591 24
Full Text Views 201 15 2
PDF Downloads 199 21 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0