Predictors of long-term success after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

Clinical article

Jonathan P. Miller Department of Neurological Surgery and

Search for other papers by Jonathan P. Miller in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Stephen T. Magill School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Search for other papers by Stephen T. Magill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 B.S.
,
Feridun Acar Department of Neurological Surgery and

Search for other papers by Feridun Acar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
, and
Kim J. Burchiel Department of Neurological Surgery and

Search for other papers by Kim J. Burchiel in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $536.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $636.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $536.00
USD  $636.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective treatment for trigeminal neuralgia (TN). However, many patients do not experience complete pain relief, and relapse can occur even after an initial excellent result. This study was designed to identify characteristics associated with improved long-term outcome after MVD.

Methods

One hundred seventy-nine consecutive patients who had undergone MVD for TN at the authors' institution were contacted, and 95 were enrolled in the study. Patients provided information about preoperative pain characteristics including preponderance of shock-like (Type 1 TN) or constant (Type 2 TN) pain, preoperative duration, trigger points, anticonvulsant therapy response, memorable onset, and pain-free intervals. Three groups were defined based on outcome: 1) excellent, pain relief without medication; 2) good, mild or intermittent pain controlled with low-dose medication; and 3) poor, severe persistent pain or need for additional surgical treatment.

Results

Type of TN pain (Type 1 TN vs Type 2 TN) was the only significant predictor of outcome after MVD. Results were excellent, good, and poor for Type 1 TN versus Type 2 TN patients in 60 versus 25%, 24 versus 39%, and 16 versus 36%, respectively. Among patients with each TN type, there was a significant trend toward better outcome with greater proportional contribution of Type 1 TN (lancinating) symptoms (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Pain relief after MVD is strongly correlated with the lancinating pain component, and therefore type of TN pain is the best predictor of long-term outcome after MVD. Application of this information should be helpful in the selection of TN patients likely to benefit from MVD.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

AED = anticonvulsant drug; MVD = microvascular decompression; TN = trigeminal neuralgia.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Barker FG II, , Jannetta PJ, , Bissonette DJ, , Larkins MV, & Jho HD: The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 334:10771083, 1996

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Burchiel KJ: Abnormal impulse generation in focally demyelinated trigeminal roots. J Neurosurg 53:674683, 1980

  • 3

    Burchiel KJ: A new classification for facial pain. Neurosurgery 53:11641167, 2003

  • 4

    Burchiel KJ, & Slavin KV: On the natural history of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 46:152155, 2000

  • 5

    Devor M, , Govrin-Lippmann R, & Rappaport ZH: Mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia: an ultrastructural analysis of trigeminal root specimens obtained during microvascular decompression surgery. J Neurosurg 96:532543, 2002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Elias WJ, & Burchiel KJ: Trigeminal neuralgia and other craniofacial pain syndromes: an overview. Semin Neurosurg 15:5969, 2004

  • 7

    Eller JL, , Raslan AM, & Burchiel KJ: Trigeminal neuralgia: definition and classification. Neurosurg Focus 18:5 E3, 2005

  • 8

    Haines SJ, , Jannetta PJ, & Zorub DS: Microvascular relations of the trigeminal nerve. An anatomical study with clinical correlation. J Neurosurg 52:381386, 1980

  • 9

    Hamlyn PJ, & King TT: Neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia: a clinical and anatomical study. J Neurosurg 76:948954, 1992

  • 10

    Jannetta PJ: Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 26:Suppl 159162, 1967

  • 11

    Leandri M, , Eldridge P, & Miles J: Recovery of nerve conduction following microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology 51:16411646, 1998

  • 12

    Li ST, , Pan Q, , Liu N, , Shen F, , Liu Z, & Guan Y: Trigeminal neuralgia: what are the important factors for good operative outcomes with microvascular decompression. Surg Neurol 62:400405, 2004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Nurmikko TJ, & Eldridge PR: Trigeminal neuralgia—pathophysiology, diagnosis and current treatment. Br J Anaesth 87:117132, 2001

  • 14

    Tyler-Kabara EC, , Kassam AB, , Horowitz MH, , Urgo L, , Hadjipanayis C, & Levy EI, et al.: Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression. J Neurosurg 96:527531, 2002

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1978 453 46
Full Text Views 377 26 4
PDF Downloads 259 22 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0