Perioperative team communication through a mobile app for improving coordination and education in neurosurgery cases

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery and
  • | 2 Perioperative Services, NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

OBJECTIVE

Miscommunication and poor coordination among surgical teams are known causes of preventable medical harms and operating room inefficiencies and inhibit surgical training. Technology may help overcome these challenges. This study used the personal experience of one of the authors as a former Air Force F-15 pilot to design a combat aviation pre- and postoperative communication workflow in the neurosurgery department and tested its effect on safety, efficiency, and education. The authors hypothesized that the adoption of this workflow through a tailored technological platform will increase compliance and improve the chances of sustainability.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from neurosurgery cases before (January–May 2020) and after (June–October 2020) implementation of this workflow. Briefing and debriefing were executed using a custom mobile platform and were defined as nonmandatory for all participants. All faculty and residents who operated at NYU Langone Medical Center (Tisch campus) during the intervention period were enrolled on the platform. Primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality per the department’s criteria, and intraoperative last-minute requests as reported by operating room staff in a double-blinded fashion. Secondary outcomes were user responses on the subjective questionnaires.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 637 and 893 cases during the preintervention and intervention periods, respectively. The average briefing rates for residents and surgeons were 71% and 81%, respectively, and the average debriefing rates for residents and surgeons were 67% and 88%. There was no significant difference in preoperative risk score between the preintervention and intervention patient populations (p = 0.24). The rate of intraoperative last-minute requests significantly decreased from 16.6% (35/211) to 10.5% (35/334, p = 0.048). There was no significant change in morbidity and mortality between the preintervention and intervention periods. On subjective questionnaires there was a statistically significant improvement in safety, efficiency, and educational aspects of the cases during the intervention period.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of aviation-like structured team communication practices in the neurosurgery department through a technological platform improved education and communication between surgical teams and led to a reduction in last-minute surgical requests that could impact costs.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; CI = confidence interval; OR = operating room.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Buljac-Samardzic M, Doekhie KD, van Wijngaarden JDH. Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Berger MS, Wachter RM, Greysen SR, Lau CY. Changing our culture to advance patient safety: the 2013 AANS Presidential Address. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(6):13591369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    McGreevy J, Otten T, Poggi M, et al. The challenge of changing roles and improving surgical care now: Crew Resource Management approach. Am Surg. 2006;72(11):10821087.11261148.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    McGreevy JM, Otten TD. Briefing and debriefing in the operating room using fighter pilot crew resource management. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(1):169176.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(4):533540.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Mazzocco K, Petitti DB, Fong KT, et al. Surgical team behaviors and patient outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):678685.

  • 7

    Rogers SO Jr, Gawande AA, Kwaan M, et al. Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. Surgery. 2006;140(1):2533.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Rolston JD, Bernstein M. Errors in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2015;26(2):149155, vii.

  • 9

    Buljac-Samardzic M, Dekker-van Doorn CM, van Wijngaarden JDH, van Wijk KP. Interventions to improve team effectiveness: a systematic review. Health Policy. 2010;94(3):183195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491499.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Bliss LA, Ross-Richardson CB, Sanzari LJ, et al. Thirty-day outcomes support implementation of a surgical safety checklist. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):766776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Böhmer AB, Wappler F, Tinschmann T, et al. The implementation of a perioperative checklist increases patients’ perioperative safety and staff satisfaction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(3):332338.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Dabholkar Y, Velankar H, Suryanarayan S, et al. Evaluation and customization of WHO safety checklist for patient safety in otorhinolaryngology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;70(1):149155.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Erestam S, Haglind E, Bock D, et al. Changes in safety climate and teamwork in the operating room after implementation of a revised WHO checklist: a prospective interventional study. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;11:4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Einav Y, Gopher D, Kara I, et al. Preoperative briefing in the operating room: shared cognition, teamwork, and patient safety. Chest. 2010;137(2):443449.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Papaspyros SC, Javangula KC, Adluri RK, O’Regan DJ. Briefing and debriefing in the cardiac operating room. Analysis of impact on theatre team attitude and patient safety. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(1):4347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Green B, Oeppen RS, Smith DW, Brennan PA. Challenging hierarchy in healthcare teams—ways to flatten gradients to improve teamwork and patient care. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(5):449453.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Healey AN, Undre S, Vincent CA. Defining the technical skills of teamwork in surgery. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(4):231234.

  • 19

    Howe EE. Empowering certified nurse’s aides to improve quality of work life through a team communication program. Geriatr Nurs. 2014;35(2):132136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Foo E, McDonald R, Savage E, et al. Mobile task management tool that improves workflow of an acute general surgical service. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(10):760765.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Fong AJ, Smith M, Langerman A. Efficiency improvement in the operating room. J Surg Res. 2016;204(2):371383.

  • 22

    Lee DJ, Ding J, Guzzo TJ. Improving operating room efficiency. Curr Urol Rep. 2019;20(6):28.

  • 23

    Weld LR, Stringer MT, Ebertowski JS, et al. TeamSTEPPS improves operating room efficiency and patient safety. Am J Med Qual. 2016;31(5):408414.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Dreyfus D, Nair A, Rosales C. The impact of planning and communication on unplanned costs in surgical episodes of care: implications for reducing waste in hospital operating rooms. J Oper Manage. 2019;66(1-2):91111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 659 659 162
Full Text Views 58 58 8
PDF Downloads 56 56 11
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0