Results of a prospective multicenter controlled study comparing surgical outcomes of microscopic versus fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: the Transsphenoidal Extent of Resection (TRANSSPHER) Study

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Many surgeons have adopted fully endoscopic over microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for nonfunctioning pituitary tumors, although no high-quality evidence demonstrates superior patient outcomes with endoscopic surgery. The goal of this analysis was to compare these techniques in a prospective multicenter controlled study.

METHODS

Extent of tumor resection was compared after endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in adults with nonfunctioning adenomas. The primary end point was gross-total tumor resection determined by postoperative MRI. Secondary end points included volumetric extent of tumor resection, pituitary hormone outcomes, and standard quality measures.

RESULTS

Seven pituitary centers and 15 surgeons participated in the study. Of the 530 patients screened, 260 were enrolled (82 who underwent microscopic procedures, 177 who underwent endoscopic procedures, and 1 who cancelled surgery) between February 2015 and June 2017. Surgeons who used the microscopic technique were more experienced than the surgeons who used the endoscopic technique in terms of years in practice and number of transsphenoidal surgeries performed (p < 0.001). Gross-total resection was achieved in 80.0% (60/75) of microscopic surgery patients and 83.7% (139/166) of endoscopic surgery patients (p = 0.47, OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.4–1.6). Volumetric extent of resection, length of stay, surgery-related deaths, and unplanned readmission rates were similar between groups (p > 0.2). New hormone deficiency was present at 6 months in 28.4% (19/67) of the microscopic surgery patients and 9.7% (14/145) of the endoscopic surgery patients (p < 0.001, OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.7–7.7). Microscopic surgery cases were significantly shorter in duration than endoscopic surgery cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Experienced surgeons who performed microscopic surgery and less experienced surgeons who performed endoscopic surgery achieved similar extents of tumor resection and quality outcomes in patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas. The endoscopic technique may be associated with lower rates of postoperative pituitary gland dysfunction. This study generally supports the transition to endoscopic pituitary surgery when the procedure is performed by proficient surgeons, although both techniques yield overall acceptable surgical outcomes.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: therapeutic; study design: prospective cohort trial; evidence: class III.

Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02357498 (clinicaltrials.gov)

ABBREVIATIONS GTR = gross-total resection; STR = subtotal resection; TRANSSPHER Study = Transsphenoidal Extent of Resection Study.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Andrew S. Little: c/o Neuroscience Publications, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ. neuropub@barrowneuro.org.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 22, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2018.11.JNS181238.Disclosures Dr. Little is a stockholder in Kogent Surgical, LLC, and has stock options in SPIWay, LLC. Dr. Kelly receives royalties from Mizuho America Inc. Dr. Chicoine has received unrestricted grant funding from IMRIS Inc. Dr. Barkhoudarian has received consulting fees from Vascular Technology Inc. Dr. Gardner is a stockholder in SPIWay, LLC. Dr. Prevedello is a consultant for Stryker Corp., Medtronic, plc, and Codman Neuro, and he receives royalties from KLS Martin, LP.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Ammirati MWei LCiric I: Short-term outcome of endoscopic versus microscopic pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:8438492013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Asemota AOIshii MBrem HGallia GL: Comparison of complications, trends, and costs in endoscopic vs microscopic pituitary surgery: analysis from a US health claims database. Neurosurgery 81:4584722017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Azad TDLee YJVail DVeeravagu AHwang PHRatliff JK: Endoscopic vs. microscopic resection of sellar lesions-a matched analysis of clinical and socioeconomic outcomes. Front Surg 4:332017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Barker FG IIKlibanski ASwearingen B: Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996–2000: mortality, morbidity, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volume. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:470947192003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Cappabianca PCavallo LMEsposito Fde Divitiis E: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: procedure, endoscopic equipment and instrumentation. Childs Nerv Syst 20:7968012004

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Ciric IRagin ABaumgartner CPierce D: Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40:2252371997

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Dallapiazza RFJane JA Jr: Outcomes of endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 44:1051152015

  • 8

    Dehdashti ARGanna AKarabatsou KGentili F: Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 62:100610172008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    D’Haens JVan Rompaey KStadnik THaentjens PPoppe KVelkeniers B: Fully endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for functioning pituitary adenomas: a retrospective comparison with traditional transsphenoidal microsurgery in the same institution. Surg Neurol 72:3363402009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Elhadi AMHardesty DAZaidi HAKalani MYNakaji PWhite WL: Evaluation of surgical freedom for microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to the sella. Neurosurgery 11 (Suppl 2):69792015

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Fatemi NDusick JRMattozo CMcArthur DLCohan PBoscardin J: Pituitary hormonal loss and recovery after transsphenoidal adenoma removal. Neurosurgery 63:7097192008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Gao YZhong CWang YXu SGuo YDai C: Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 12:942014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Gondim JAAlmeida JPde Albuquerque LAGomes ESchops MFerraz T: Pure endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for treatment of acromegaly: results of 67 cases treated in a pituitary center. Neurosurg Focus 29(4):E72010

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Goudakos JKMarkou KDGeorgalas C: Endoscopic versus microscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 36:2122202011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Hardy J: Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. J Neurosurg 34:5825941971

  • 16

    Jho HDCarrau RL: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 87:44511997

  • 17

    Kasemsiri PCarrau RLDitzel Filho LFPrevedello DMOtto BAOld M: Advantages and limitations of endoscopic endonasal approaches to the skull base. World Neurosurg 82 (6 Suppl):S12S212014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kassam ASnyderman CHMintz AGardner PCarrau RL: Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 19(1):E32005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Knosp ESteiner EKitz KMatula C: Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:6106181993

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Little ASChapple K: Predictors of resource utilization in transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease. J Neurosurg 119:5045112013

  • 21

    Little ASChapple KJahnke HWhite WL: Comparative inpatient resource utilization for patients undergoing endoscopic or microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary lesions. J Neurosurg 121:84902014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    McLaughlin NEisenberg AACohan PChaloner CBKelly DF: Value of endoscopy for maximizing tumor removal in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. J Neurosurg 118:6136202013

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Mooney MAHardesty DASheehy JPBird RChapple KWhite WL: Interrater and intrarater reliability of the Knosp scale for pituitary adenoma grading. J Neurosurg 126:171417192017

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Mortini P: Cons: endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery is not superior to microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas. Endocrine 47:4154202014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Paluzzi AFernandez-Miranda JCStefko STChallinor SSnyderman CHGardner PA: Endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: a series of 555 patients. Pituitary 17:3073192014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Patel SKHusain QEloy JACouldwell WTLiu JK: Norman DottGerard Guiot and Jules Hardy: key players in the resurrection and preservation of transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33(2):E62012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Tabaee AAnand VKBarrón YHiltzik DHBrown SMKacker A: Endoscopic pituitary surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg 111:5455542009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Wilson CBDempsey LC: Transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of 250 pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 48:13221978

  • 29

    Zaidi HAAwad AWBohl MAChapple KKnecht LJahnke H: Comparison of outcomes between a less experienced surgeon using a fully endoscopic technique and a very experienced surgeon using a microscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg 124:5966042016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Zhu MYang JWang YCao WZhu YQiu L: [Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery versus microsurgery for the resection of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review.] Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 49:2362392014 (Chinese)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 17 17 17
Full Text Views 9 9 9
PDF Downloads 12 12 12
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar