Regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes in traumatic brain injury: experience from the tirilazad trials

Restricted access

Object. Regional differences have been shown in patient characteristics and case management within multiple unselected series of patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI). One might expect that such regional heterogeneity would be small in a more selected population of a randomized clinical trial. The goal of this study was to examine what regional differences in patient characteristics, case management, and outcomes exist between continents and among countries within a patient population included in a randomized clinical trial.

Methods. Data were extracted from two concurrently conducted randomized clinical trials of the drug tirilazad; the designs of these studies were similar. The studies included 1701 patients with severe and 476 patients with moderate TBI. Differences were primarily investigated between studies performed in Europe and North America, but also among European regions and between Canada and the United States. Associations among regions and outcomes (6-month mortality rate and Glasgow Outcome Scale scores) were studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Comparisons between continents and among regions within Europe showed differences in the distribution of patient ages, causes of injury, and several clinical characteristics (motor score, pupillary reactivity, hypoxia, hypotension, intracranial pressure [ICP]), and findings on computerized tomography scans. Secondary referrals occurred 2.5 times more frequently in Europe. Within Europe secondary referral was mainly associated with an increased proportion of patients with mass lesions (46% in the European Study compared with 40% in the North American Study). Therapy for lowering ICP was more frequently applied in North America. After adjustments for case mix and management, mortality and unfavorable outcomes were significantly higher in Europe (odds ratios = 1.58 and 1.46, respectively). Significant differences in outcome between regions within Europe or within North America were not observed.

Conclusions. Despite the use of a strict study protocol, considerable differences in patient characteristics and case management exist between continents and among countries, reflecting variations in social, cultural, and organizational aspects. Outcomes of TBI may be worse in Europe compared with North America, but this finding requires further study.

Article Information

Address reprint requests to: Chantal W.P.M. Hukkelhoven, M.Sc., Center for Clinical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Ee20–42, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. email: hukkelhoven@mgz.fgg.eur.nl.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

  • 1.

    Bullock RMChesnut RMClifton GLet al: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 17:4515532000Bullock RM Chesnut RM Clifton GL et al: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 1: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 17:451–553 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Chesnut RMGhajar JMaas AIRet al: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 17:5576272000Chesnut RM Ghajar J Maas AIR et al: Management and prognosis of severe traumatic brain injury. Part 2: Early indicators of prognosis in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 17:557–627 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Clifton GLChoi SCMiller ERet al: Intercenter variance in clinical trials of head trauma—experience of the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia. J Neurosurg 95:7517552001Clifton GL Choi SC Miller ER et al: Intercenter variance in clinical trials of head trauma—experience of the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia. J Neurosurg 95:751–755 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Foulkes MAEisenberg HMJane JAet al: The Traumatic Coma Data Bank: design, methods and baseline characteristics. J Neurosurg 75 (Suppl):S8S131991Foulkes MA Eisenberg HM Jane JA et al: The Traumatic Coma Data Bank: design methods and baseline characteristics. J Neurosurg 75 (Suppl):S8–S13 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Gennarelli TThibault LE: Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma 22:6806861982Gennarelli T Thibault LE: Biomechanics of acute subdural hematoma. J Trauma 22:680–686 1982

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Ghajar JHariri RJNarayan RKet al: Survey of critical care management in comatose head-injured patients in the United States. Crit Care Med 23:5605671995Ghajar J Hariri RJ Narayan RK et al: Survey of critical care management in comatose head-injured patients in the United States. Crit Care Med 23:560–567 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Gutman MBMoulton RJSullivan Iet al: Risk factors predicting operable intracranial hematomas in head injury. J Neurosurg 77:9141992Gutman MB Moulton RJ Sullivan I et al: Risk factors predicting operable intracranial hematomas in head injury. J Neurosurg 77:9–14 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Hall EDYonkers PAAndrus PKet al: Biochemistry and pharmacology of lipid antioxidants in acute brain and spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 9 (Suppl 2):S425S4421992Hall ED Yonkers PA Andrus PK et al: Biochemistry and pharmacology of lipid antioxidants in acute brain and spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 9 (Suppl 2):S425–S442 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Harrell FE JrLee KLMark DB: Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:3613871996Harrell FE Jr Lee KL Mark DB: Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models evaluating assumptions and adequacy and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Jeevaratnam DRMenon DK: Survey of intensive care of severely head injured patients in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 312:9449471996Jeevaratnam DR Menon DK: Survey of intensive care of severely head injured patients in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 312:944–947 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Jennett BBond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:4804841975Jennett B Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484 1975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Jennett BTeasdale GGalbraith Set al: Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:2912981977Jennett B Teasdale G Galbraith S et al: Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:291–298 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Little RJA: Regression with missing X's: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 87:122712371992Little RJA: Regression with missing X's: a review. J Am Stat Assoc 87:1227–1237 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Maas AISteyerberg EWMurray GDet al: Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurgery 44:128612981999Maas AI Steyerberg EW Murray GD et al: Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurgery 44:1286–1298 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Machado SGMurray GDTeasdale GM: Evaluation of designs for clinical trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. J Neurotrauma 16:113111381999Machado SG Murray GD Teasdale GM: Evaluation of designs for clinical trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury. European Brain Injury Consortium. J Neurotrauma 16:1131–1138 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Marshall LFBecker DPBowers SAet al: The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1. Design, purpose, goals, and results. J Neurosurg 59:2762841983Marshall LF Becker DP Bowers SA et al: The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 1. Design purpose goals and results. J Neurosurg 59:276–284 1983

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Marshall LFMaas AIMarshall SBet al: A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury. J Neurosurg 89:5195251998Marshall LF Maas AI Marshall SB et al: A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury. J Neurosurg 89:519–525 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Marshall LFMarshall SBKlauber MRet al: A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75 (Suppl):S14S201991Marshall LF Marshall SB Klauber MR et al: A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 75 (Suppl):S14–S20 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Matta BMenon D: Severe head injury in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a survey of practice and implications for management. Crit Care Med 24:174317481996Matta B Menon D: Severe head injury in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a survey of practice and implications for management. Crit Care Med 24:1743–1748 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Murray GDTeasdale GMBraakman Ret al: The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Acta Neurochir 141:2232361999Murray GD Teasdale GM Braakman R et al: The European Brain Injury Consortium survey of head injuries. Acta Neurochir 141:223–236 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Murray LSTeasdale GMMurray GDet al: Head injuries in four British neurosurgical centers. Br J Neurosurg 13:5645691999Murray LS Teasdale GM Murray GD et al: Head injuries in four British neurosurgical centers. Br J Neurosurg 13:564–569 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Robinson LDJewell NP: Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev 58:2272401991Robinson LD Jewell NP: Some surprising results about covariate adjustment in logistic regression models. Int Stat Rev 58:227–240 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Steyerberg EWBossuyt PMMLee KL: Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? Am Heart J 139:7457512000Steyerberg EW Bossuyt PMM Lee KL: Clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction: Should we adjust for baseline characteristics? Am Heart J 139:745–751 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Teasdale GJennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81841974Teasdale G Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84 1974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 220 220 61
Full Text Views 211 175 4
PDF Downloads 102 84 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar