Accuracy of true frameless stereotaxy: in vivo measurement and laboratory phantom studies

Technical note

Restricted access

✓ The authors present the results of accuracy measurements, obtained in both laboratory phantom studies and an in vivo assessment, for a technique of frameless stereotaxy. An instrument holder was developed to facilitate stereotactic guidance and enable introduction of frameless methods to traditional frame-based procedures. The accuracy of frameless stereotaxy was assessed for images acquired using 0.5-tesla or 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or 2-mm axial, 3-mm axial, or 3-mm helical computerized tomography (CT) scanning. A clinical series is reported in which biopsy samples were obtained using a frameless stereotactic procedure, and the accuracy of these procedures was assessed using postoperative MR images and image fusion.

The overall mean error of phantom frameless stereotaxy was found to be 1.3 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.6 mm). The mean error for CT-directed frameless stereotaxy was 1.1 mm (SD 0.5 mm) and that for MR image—directed procedures was 1.4 mm (SD 0.7 mm). The CT-guided frameless stereotaxy was significantly more accurate than MR image—directed stereotaxy (p = 0.0001). In addition, 2-mm axial CT-guided stereotaxy was significantly more accurate than 3-mm axial CT-guided stereotaxy (p = 0.025). In the clinical series of 21 frameless stereotactically obtained biopsies, all specimens yielded the appropriate diagnosis and no complications ensued. Early postoperative MR images were obtained in 16 of these cases and displacement of the biopsy site from the intraoperative target was determined by fusion of pre- and postoperative image data sets. The mean in vivo linear error of frameless stereotactic biopsy sampling was 2.3 mm (SD 1.9 mm). The mean in vivo Euclidean error was 4.8 mm (SD 2 mm). The implications of these accuracy measurements and of error in stereotaxy are discussed.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address reprint requests to: Neil L. Dorward, F.R.C.S., University Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Headings
References
  • 1.

    Alberti ODorward NLKitchen NDet al: Neuronavigation—impact on operating time. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68:46481997Alberti O Dorward NL Kitchen ND et al: Neuronavigation—impact on operating time. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 68:46–48 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Barnett GHKormos DWSteiner CPet al: Use of a frameless, armless stereotactic wand for brain tumor localization with two-dimensional and three-dimensional neuroimaging. Neurosurgery 33:6746781993Barnett GH Kormos DW Steiner CP et al: Use of a frameless armless stereotactic wand for brain tumor localization with two-dimensional and three-dimensional neuroimaging. Neurosurgery 33:674–678 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Barnett GHSteiner CPWeisenberger J: Target and trajectory guidance for interactive surgical navigation systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:91951996Barnett GH Steiner CP Weisenberger J: Target and trajectory guidance for interactive surgical navigation systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:91–95 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Bucholz RDHo HWRubin JP: Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 79:6676731993Bucholz RD Ho HW Rubin JP: Variables affecting the accuracy of stereotactic localization using computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 79:667–673 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Burchiel KJNguyen TTCoombs BDet al: MRI distortion and stereotactic neurosurgery using the Cosman-Roberts-Wells and Leksell frames. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:1231361996Burchiel KJ Nguyen TT Coombs BD et al: MRI distortion and stereotactic neurosurgery using the Cosman-Roberts-Wells and Leksell frames. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:123–136 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Derosier CDelegue GMunier Tet al: IRM, distorsion géométrique de l'image et stéréotaxie. J Radiol 72:3493531991Derosier C Delegue G Munier T et al: IRM distorsion géométrique de l'image et stéréotaxie. J Radiol 72:349–353 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Dorward NL: Neuronavigation—the surgeon's sextant. Br J Neurosurg 11:1011031997Dorward NL: Neuronavigation—the surgeon's sextant. Br J Neurosurg 11:101–103 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Dorward NLAlberti ODijkstra Aet al: Clinical introduction of an adjustable rigid instrument holder for frameless stereotactic interventions. Comput Aided Surg 2:1801851997Dorward NL Alberti O Dijkstra A et al: Clinical introduction of an adjustable rigid instrument holder for frameless stereotactic interventions. Comput Aided Surg 2:180–185 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Dorward NLAlberti OVelani Bet al: Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude, correlates, and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 88:6566621998Dorward NL Alberti O Velani B et al: Postimaging brain distortion: magnitude correlates and impact on neuronavigation. J Neurosurg 88:656–662 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Dorward NLWadley JAlberti Oet al: One hundred consecutive cases with EasyGuide Neuro. Comput Aided Surg 2:2091997 (Abstract)Dorward NL Wadley J Alberti O et al: One hundred consecutive cases with EasyGuide Neuro. Comput Aided Surg 2:209 1997 (Abstract)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Drake JMRutka JTHoffman HJ: ISG Viewing Wand System. Neurosurgery 34:109410971994Drake JM Rutka JT Hoffman HJ: ISG Viewing Wand System. Neurosurgery 34:1094–1097 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Fuchs MWischmann HANeumann Aet al: Accuracy analysis for image-guided neurosurgery using fiducial skin markers, 3D CT imaging, and an optical localizer system in Lemke HUVannier MWInamura Ket al (eds): CAR 96. Computer Assisted Radiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier1996 pp 770775Fuchs M Wischmann HA Neumann A et al: Accuracy analysis for image-guided neurosurgery using fiducial skin markers 3D CT imaging and an optical localizer system in Lemke HU Vannier MW Inamura K et al (eds): CAR 96. Computer Assisted Radiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1996 pp 770–775

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Golfinos JGFitzpatrick BCSmith LRet al: Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 83:1972051995Golfinos JG Fitzpatrick BC Smith LR et al: Clinical use of a frameless stereotactic arm: results of 325 cases. J Neurosurg 83:197–205 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Gomez HBarnett GHEstes MLet al: Stereotactic and computer-assisted neurosurgery at the Cleveland Clinic: review of 501 consecutive cases. Cleveland Clin J Med 60:3994101993Gomez H Barnett GH Estes ML et al: Stereotactic and computer-assisted neurosurgery at the Cleveland Clinic: review of 501 consecutive cases. Cleveland Clin J Med 60:399–410 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Henderson JMEichholz KMBucholz RD: Decreased length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing image-guided craniotomies. J Neurosurg 86:367A1997 (Abstract)Henderson JM Eichholz KM Bucholz RD: Decreased length of stay and hospital costs in patients undergoing image-guided craniotomies. J Neurosurg 86:367A 1997 (Abstract)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Kamiryo TLaws ER Jr: Stereotactic frame-based error in magnetic-resonance-guided stereotactic procedures: a method for measurement of error and standardization of technique. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 67:1982091996/97Kamiryo T Laws ER Jr: Stereotactic frame-based error in magnetic-resonance-guided stereotactic procedures: a method for measurement of error and standardization of technique. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 67:198–209 1996/97

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Laborde GKlimek LHarders Aet al: Frameless stereotactic drainage of intracranial abscesses. Surg Neurol 40:16211993Laborde G Klimek L Harders A et al: Frameless stereotactic drainage of intracranial abscesses. Surg Neurol 40:16–21 1993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Maciunas RJBerger MSCopeland Bet al: A technique for interactive image-guided neurosurgical intervention in primary brain tumors. Neurosurg Clin North Am 7:2452661996Maciunas RJ Berger MS Copeland B et al: A technique for interactive image-guided neurosurgical intervention in primary brain tumors. Neurosurg Clin North Am 7:245–266 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Maciunas RJFitzpatrick JMGadamsetty Set al: A universal method for geometric correction of magnetic resonance images for stereotactic neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:1371401996Maciunas RJ Fitzpatrick JM Gadamsetty S et al: A universal method for geometric correction of magnetic resonance images for stereotactic neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:137–140 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Maciunas RJGalloway RL JrLatimer Jet al: An independent application accuracy evaluation of stereotactic frame systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 58:1031071992Maciunas RJ Galloway RL Jr Latimer J et al: An independent application accuracy evaluation of stereotactic frame systems. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 58:103–107 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Maciunas RJGalloway RL JrLatimer JW: The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35:6826951994Maciunas RJ Galloway RL Jr Latimer JW: The application accuracy of stereotactic frames. Neurosurgery 35:682–695 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Maurer CRJFitzpatrick JMWang MYet al: Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:4474621997Maurer CRJ Fitzpatrick JM Wang MY et al: Registration of head volume images using implantable fiducial markers. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16:447–462 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Roessler KUngersboeck KDietrich Wet al: Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: clinical experience with an infrared based pointer device navigation system. Acta Neurochir 139:5515591997Roessler K Ungersboeck K Dietrich W et al: Frameless stereotactic guided neurosurgery: clinical experience with an infrared based pointer device navigation system. Acta Neurochir 139:551–559 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Rohling RMunger PHollerbach JMet al: Comparison of relative accuracy between a mechanical and an optical position tracker for image-guided neurosurgery. J Image Guid Surg 1:30341995Rohling R Munger P Hollerbach JM et al: Comparison of relative accuracy between a mechanical and an optical position tracker for image-guided neurosurgery. J Image Guid Surg 1:30–34 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    Sandeman DRGill SS: The impact of interactive image guided surgery: the Bristol experience with the ISG/Elekta viewing wand. Acta Neurochir Suppl 64:54581995Sandeman DR Gill SS: The impact of interactive image guided surgery: the Bristol experience with the ISG/Elekta viewing wand. Acta Neurochir Suppl 64:54–58 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Sipos EPTebo SAZinreich SJet al: In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG viewing wand. Neurosurgery 39:1942021996Sipos EP Tebo SA Zinreich SJ et al: In vivo accuracy testing and clinical experience with the ISG viewing wand. Neurosurgery 39:194–202 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Smith KRFrank KJBucholz RD: The NeuroStation—a highly accurate, minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:2472561994Smith KR Frank KJ Bucholz RD: The NeuroStation—a highly accurate minimally invasive solution to frameless stereotactic neurosurgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 18:247–256 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Spetzger ULaborde GGilsbach JM: Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:1631661995Spetzger U Laborde G Gilsbach JM: Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:163–166 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Walton LHampshire AForster DMCet al: Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions. Neurosurgery 41:1311391997Walton L Hampshire A Forster DMC et al: Stereotactic localization with magnetic resonance imaging: a phantom study to compare the accuracy obtained using two-dimensional and three-dimensional data acquisitions. Neurosurgery 41:131–139 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 429 426 53
Full Text Views 187 135 1
PDF Downloads 73 59 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar