Improved confidence of outcome prediction in severe head injury

A comparative analysis of the clinical examination, multimodality evoked potentials, CT scanning, and intracranial pressure

Restricted access

✓ An analysis of clinical signs, singly or in combination, multimodality evoked potentials (MEP's), computerized tomography scans, and intracranial pressure (ICP) data was undertaken prospectively in 133 severely head-injured patients to ascertain the accuracy, reliability, and relative value of these indicants individually, or in various combinations, in predicting one of two categories of outcome. Erroneous predictions, either falsely optimistic (FO) or falsely pessimistic (FP), were analyzed to gain pathophysiological insights into the disease process. Falsely optimistic predictions occurred because of unpredictable complications, whereas FP predictions were due to intrinsic weakness of the indicants as prognosticators.

A combination of clinical data, including age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, pupillary response, presence of surgical mass lesions, extraocular motility, and motor posturing predicted outcome with 82% accuracy, 43% with over 90% confidence. Nine percent of predictions were FO and 9% FP. The GCS score alone was accurate in 80% of predictions, but at a lower level of confidence (25% at the over-90% level), with 7% FO and 13% FP. Computerized tomography and ICP data in isolation proved to be poor prognostic indicants. When combined individually with clinical data, however, they increased the number of predictions made with over 90% confidence to 52% and 55%, respectively. Data from MEP's represented the most accurate single prognostic indicant, with 91% correct predictions, 25% at the over-90% confidence level. There were no FP errors associated with this indicant. Supplementation of the clinical examination with MEP data yielded optimal prognostic power, an 89% accuracy rate, with 64% over the 90% confidence level and only 4% FP errors.

The clinical examination remains the strongest basis for prognosticating outcome in severe head injury, but additional studies enhance the reliability of such predictions.

Article Information

Address reprint requests to: Raj K. Narayan, M.D., Division of Neurological Surgery, Box 631, MCV Station, Medical College of Virginia, 1200 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23298.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Predictions based on different indicants singly and in combinations. Note the increasing proportion of over-90% confident predictions (in black) achieved with the combinations depicted on the right. CT = computerized tomography; ICP = intracranial pressure; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; MEP = multimodality evoked potentials.

References

  • 1.

    Auer LGell GRichling Bet al: Predicting outcome after severe head injury — a computer-assisted analysis of neurological symptoms and laboratory values. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:1711731979Auer L Gell G Richling B et al: Predicting outcome after severe head injury — a computer-assisted analysis of neurological symptoms and laboratory values. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:171–173 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2.

    Avezaat CJJvan den Berge HJBraakman R: Eye movements as a prognostic factor. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:26281979Avezaat CJJ van den Berge HJ Braakman R: Eye movements as a prognostic factor. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:26–28 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3.

    Becker DPMiller JDWard JDet al: The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47:4915021977Becker DP Miller JD Ward JD et al: The outcome from severe head injury with early diagnosis and intensive management. J Neurosurg 47:491–502 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4.

    Bowers SAMarshall LF: Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County: a prospective analysis. Neurosurgery 6:2372421980Bowers SA Marshall LF: Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County: a prospective analysis. Neurosurgery 6:237–242 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5.

    Braakman RGelpke GJHabbema JDFet al: Systematic selection of prognostic features in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 6:3623701980Braakman R Gelpke GJ Habbema JDF et al: Systematic selection of prognostic features in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 6:362–370 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6.

    Carlsson C-Avon Essen CLöfgren J: Factors affecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. Part 1: Influence of biological factors; Part 2: Significance of posttraumatic coma. J Neurosurg 29:2422511968Carlsson C-A von Essen C Löfgren J: Factors affecting the clinical course of patients with severe head injuries. Part 1: Influence of biological factors; Part 2: Significance of posttraumatic coma. J Neurosurg 29:242–251 1968

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7.

    Clifton GLGrossman RGMakela MEet al: Neurological course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 52:6116241980Clifton GL Grossman RG Makela ME et al: Neurological course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg 52:611–624 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8.

    Daly C: A simple test for trends in a contingency table. Biometrics 18:1141191962Daly C: A simple test for trends in a contingency table. Biometrics 18:114–119 1962

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9.

    Desmedt JE (ed): Clinical Uses of Cerebral Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology Vol 7. Basel: S Karger1980352 ppDesmedt JE (ed): Clinical Uses of Cerebral Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology Vol 7. Basel: S Karger 1980 352 pp

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10.

    Dorfman LJBosley TMCummins KL: Electrophysiological localization of central somatosensory lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:7427531978Dorfman LJ Bosley TM Cummins KL: Electrophysiological localization of central somatosensory lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44:742–753 1978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11.

    Frost EAM: The pathophysiology of respiration in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg 50:6997141979Frost EAM: The pathophysiology of respiration in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg 50:699–714 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12.

    Greenberg RPBecker DPMiller JDet al: Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 2: Localization of brain dysfunction and correlation with posttraumatic neurological conditions. J Neurosurg 47:1631771977Greenberg RP Becker DP Miller JD et al: Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 2: Localization of brain dysfunction and correlation with posttraumatic neurological conditions. J Neurosurg 47:163–177 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13.

    Greenberg RPMayer DJBecker DPet al: Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 1: Evoked brain-injury potentials, methods, and analysis. J Neurosurg 47:1501621977Greenberg RP Mayer DJ Becker DP et al: Evaluation of brain function in severe human head trauma with multimodality evoked potentials. Part 1: Evoked brain-injury potentials methods and analysis. J Neurosurg 47:150–162 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14.

    Greenberg RPNewlon PGHyatt MSet al: Prognostic implications of early multimodality evoked potentials in severe head-injured patients: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 55 (In press1981)Greenberg RP Newlon PG Hyatt MS et al: Prognostic implications of early multimodality evoked potentials in severe head-injured patients: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 55 (In press 1981)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15.

    Gudeman SKKishore PRSMiller JDet al: The genesis and significance of delayed traumatic intracerebral hematoma. Neurosurgery 5:3093131979Gudeman SK Kishore PRS Miller JD et al: The genesis and significance of delayed traumatic intracerebral hematoma. Neurosurgery 5:309–313 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16.

    Habbema JDFBraakman RAvezaat CJJ: Prognosis of the individual patient with severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:1581601979Habbema JDF Braakman R Avezaat CJJ: Prognosis of the individual patient with severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:158–160 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17.

    Halliday AMMcDonald WIMushin J: Visual evoked potentials in patients with demyelinating disease in Desmedt JE (ed): Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford: Oxford University Press1977 pp 438449Halliday AM McDonald WI Mushin J: Visual evoked potentials in patients with demyelinating disease in Desmedt JE (ed): Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1977 pp 438–449

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18.

    Jennett BBond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:4804841975Jennett B Bond M: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. A practical scale. Lancet 1:480–484 1975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19.

    Jennett BTeasdale GBraakman Ret al: Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1:103110341976Jennett B Teasdale G Braakman R et al: Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury. Lancet 1:1031–1034 1976

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20.

    Jennett BTeasdale GBraakman Ret al: Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:2832891979Jennett B Teasdale G Braakman R et al: Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 4:283–289 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21.

    Jennett BTeasdale GFrey Jet al: The assessment of the efficacy of different therapies for severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:2102121979Jennett B Teasdale G Frey J et al: The assessment of the efficacy of different therapies for severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:210–212 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22.

    Jennett BTeasdale GGalbraith Set al: Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:2912981977Jennett B Teasdale G Galbraith S et al: Severe head injuries in three countries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 40:291–298 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23.

    Langfitt TW: Measuring the outcome from head injuries. J Neurosurg 48:6736781978Langfitt TW: Measuring the outcome from head injuries. J Neurosurg 48:673–678 1978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24.

    Lobato RDRivas JJPortillo JMet al: Prognostic value of the intracranial pressure levels during the acute phase of severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:70731979Lobato RD Rivas JJ Portillo JM et al: Prognostic value of the intracranial pressure levels during the acute phase of severe head injuries. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:70–73 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25.

    MacIver INFrew IJCMatheson JG: The role of respiratory insufficiency in the mortality of severe head injuries. Lancet 1:3903931958MacIver IN Frew IJC Matheson JG: The role of respiratory insufficiency in the mortality of severe head injuries. Lancet 1:390–393 1958

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26.

    Marshall LFSmith RWShapiro HM: The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: The significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50:20251979Marshall LF Smith RW Shapiro HM: The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: The significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg 50:20–25 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27.

    Marshall LFSmith RWShapiro HM: The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part II: Acute and chronic barbiturate administration in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 50:26301979Marshall LF Smith RW Shapiro HM: The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part II: Acute and chronic barbiturate administration in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 50:26–30 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28.

    Miller JDBecker DPRosner MJet al: Implications of intracranial mass lesions for outcome of severe head injury in Popp AJBourke RSNelson LRet al (eds): Neural Trauma. New York: Raven Press1979 pp 173180Miller JD Becker DP Rosner MJ et al: Implications of intracranial mass lesions for outcome of severe head injury in Popp AJ Bourke RS Nelson LR et al (eds): Neural Trauma. New York: Raven Press 1979 pp 173–180

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29.

    Miller JDBecker DPWard JDet al: Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 47:5035161977Miller JD Becker DP Ward JD et al: Significance of intracranial hypertension in severe head injury. J Neurosurg 47:503–516 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30.

    Miller JDButterworth JFGudeman SKet al: Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:2892991981Miller JD Butterworth JF Gudeman SK et al: Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 54:289–299 1981

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31.

    Miller JDGudeman SKKishore PRSet al: CT scan, ICP and early neurological evaluation in the prognosis of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:86881979Miller JD Gudeman SK Kishore PRS et al: CT scan ICP and early neurological evaluation in the prognosis of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:86–88 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32.

    Miller JDSweet RCNarayan Ret al: Early insults to the injured brain. JAMA 240:4394421978Miller JD Sweet RC Narayan R et al: Early insults to the injured brain. JAMA 240:439–442 1978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33.

    Overgaard JChristensen SHvid-Hansen Oet al: Prognosis after head injury based on early clinical examination. Lancet 2:6316351973Overgaard J Christensen S Hvid-Hansen O et al: Prognosis after head injury based on early clinical examination. Lancet 2:631–635 1973

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34.

    Pagni CA: The prognosis of head injured patients in a state of coma with decerebrate posture. Analysis of 471 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 17:2892951973Pagni CA: The prognosis of head injured patients in a state of coma with decerebrate posture. Analysis of 471 cases. J Neurosurg Sci 17:289–295 1973

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35.

    Pazzaglia PFrank GFrank Fet al: Clinical course and prognosis of acute post-traumatic coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:1491541975Pazzaglia P Frank G Frank F et al: Clinical course and prognosis of acute post-traumatic coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38:149–154 1975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36.

    Press SJWilson S: Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 73:6997051978Press SJ Wilson S: Choosing between logistic regression and discriminant analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 73:699–705 1978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37.

    Price DJKnill-Jones R: The prediction of outcome of patients admitted following head injury in coma with bilateral fixed pupils. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:1791821979Price DJ Knill-Jones R: The prediction of outcome of patients admitted following head injury in coma with bilateral fixed pupils. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:179–182 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38.

    Rappaport MHall KHopkins Ket al: Evoked brain potentials and disability in brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 58:3333381977Rappaport M Hall K Hopkins K et al: Evoked brain potentials and disability in brain-damaged patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 58:333–338 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39.

    Richard KEFrowein RA: Significance of intracranial pressure and neurological deficit as prognostic factors in acute severe brain lesions. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:66691979Richard KE Frowein RA: Significance of intracranial pressure and neurological deficit as prognostic factors in acute severe brain lesions. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:66–69 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40.

    Roberson FCKishore PRSMiller JDet al: The value of serial computerized tomography in the management of severe head injury. Surg Neurol 12:1611671979Roberson FC Kishore PRS Miller JD et al: The value of serial computerized tomography in the management of severe head injury. Surg Neurol 12:161–167 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41.

    Rose JValtonen SJennett B: Avoidable factors contributing to death after head injury. Br Med J 2:6156181977Rose J Valtonen S Jennett B: Avoidable factors contributing to death after head injury. Br Med J 2:615–618 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42.

    Scales DMRossiter VSWeinstein ME: Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients comatose as a result of blunt head trauma. J Trauma 19:3473531979Scales DM Rossiter VS Weinstein ME: Brainstem auditory evoked responses in patients comatose as a result of blunt head trauma. J Trauma 19:347–353 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43.

    Stablein DMMiller JDChoi SCet al: Statistical methods for determining prognosis in severe head injury. Neurosurgery 6:2432481980Stablein DM Miller JD Choi SC et al: Statistical methods for determining prognosis in severe head injury. Neurosurgery 6:243–248 1980

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 44.

    Starr A: Clinical relevance of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in brain stem disorders in man in Desmedt JE (ed): Psychopharmacology Correlates of Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology Vol 2. Basel: S Karger1977 pp 4557Starr A: Clinical relevance of brain stem auditory evoked potentials in brain stem disorders in man in Desmedt JE (ed): Psychopharmacology Correlates of Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology Vol 2. Basel: S Karger 1977 pp 45–57

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 45.

    Stockard JJRossiter VS: Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities. Neurology 27:3163251977Stockard JJ Rossiter VS: Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory response abnormalities. Neurology 27:316–325 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 46.

    Sweet RCMiller JDLipper Met al: The significance of bilateral abnormalities on the CT scan in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 3:16211978Sweet RC Miller JD Lipper M et al: The significance of bilateral abnormalities on the CT scan in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 3:16–21 1978

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 47.

    Teasdale GJennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81841974Teasdale G Jennett B: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84 1974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 48.

    Teasdale GParker LMurray Get al: On comparing series of head injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:2052081979Teasdale G Parker L Murray G et al: On comparing series of head injured patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:205–208 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 49.

    Teasdale GSkene AParker Let al: Age and outcome of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:1401431979Teasdale G Skene A Parker L et al: Age and outcome of severe head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:140–143 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50.

    Tsementzis SAGordon AGillingham FJ: Prognostic signs during continuous monitoring of the ventricular fluid pressure in patients with severe brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:78841979Tsementzis SA Gordon A Gillingham FJ: Prognostic signs during continuous monitoring of the ventricular fluid pressure in patients with severe brain injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl 28:78–84 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 189 189 18
Full Text Views 1327 1327 1
PDF Downloads 106 106 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar