Saccular aneurysms in the post–Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial era

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT) was a single-center trial that compared endovascular coiling to microsurgical clipping in patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, because patients in the BRAT were treated more than 15 years ago, and because there have been advances since then—particularly in endovascular techniques—the relevance of the BRAT today remains controversial. Some hypothesize that these technical advances may reduce retreatment rates for endovascular intervention. In this study, the authors analyzed data for the post-BRAT (PBRAT) era to compare microsurgical clipping with endovascular embolization (coiling and flow diverters) in the two time periods and to examine how the results of the original BRAT have influenced the practice of neurosurgeons at the study institution.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, the authors evaluated patients with saccular aSAHs who were treated at a single quaternary center from August 1, 2007, to July 31, 2019. The saccular aSAH diagnoses were confirmed by cerebrovascular experts. Patients were separated into two cohorts for comparison on the basis of having undergone microsurgery or endovascular intervention. The primary outcome analyzed for comparison was poor neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2. The secondary outcomes that were compared included retreatment rates for both therapies.

RESULTS

Of the 1014 patients with aSAH during the study period, 798 (79%) were confirmed to have saccular aneurysms. Neurological outcomes at ≥ 1-year follow-up did not differ between patients treated with microsurgery (n = 451) and those who received endovascular (n = 347) treatment (p = 0.51). The number of retreatments was significantly higher among patients treated endovascularly (32/347, 9%) than among patients treated microsurgically (6/451, 1%) (p < 0.001). The retreatment rate after endovascular treatment was lower in the PBRAT era (9%) than in the BRAT (18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to results from the BRAT, results from the PBRAT era showed equivalent neurological outcomes and increased rates of retreatment among patients undergoing endovascular embolization compared with those undergoing microsurgery. However, the rate of retreatment after endovascular intervention was much lower in the PBRAT era than in the BRAT.

ABBREVIATIONS

aSAH = aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; BRAT = Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial; CCI = Charlson Comorbidity Index; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; HH = Hunt and Hess; ISAT = International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; PBRAT = post-BRAT.

Illustration from Morshed et al. (pp 1–8). Copyright Ken Probst. Published with permission.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, Albuquerque FC, Hills NK, Nakaji P, et al. Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(3):771776.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC, Hills NK, Wallace RC, Nakaji P. Analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(1):120125.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Zabramski JM, Albuquerque FC, Hills NK, Russin JJ, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results. J Neurosurg. 2015;123(3):609617.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Spetzler RF, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC, Zabramski JM, Hills NK, Partovi S, et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 3-year results. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(1):146157.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    McDougall CG, Spetzler RF, Zabramski JM, Partovi S, Hills NK, Nakaji P, Albuquerque FC. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(1):135144.

  • 6

    Darsaut TE, Raymond J. Letter to the Editor. Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial 10-year results. J Neurosurg. 2020;133(4):12761277.

  • 7

    Denis DJ. Crossover and clinical outcomes in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg. 2014;120(2):571572.

  • 8

    Arrese I, Sarabia R. Letter to the Editor: Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(2):380381.

  • 9

    Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809817.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Arthur AS, Molyneux A, Coon AL, Saatci I, Szikora I, Baltacioglu F, et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(9):924930.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Catapano JS, Fredrickson VL, Fujii T, Cole TS, Koester SW, Baranoski JF, et al. Complications of femoral versus radial access in neuroendovascular procedures with propensity adjustment. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(6):611615.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Chalouhi N, Drueding R, Starke RM, Jabbour P, Dumont AS, Gonzalez LF, et al. In-stent stenosis after stent-assisted coiling: incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of 435 cases. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(3):390396.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Dandapat S, Mendez-Ruiz A, Martinez-Galdámez M, Macho J, Derakhshani S, Torres GF, et al. Review of current intracranial aneurysm flow diversion technology and clinical use. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;13(1):5462.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Pierot L, Wakhloo AK. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: current status. Stroke. 2013;44(7):20462054.

  • 15

    Riina HA, Barker FG. Editorial. The relevance of the BRAT and the management of ruptured brain aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2019;132(3):760761.

  • 16

    Lawton MT, Lang MJ. The future of open vascular neurosurgery: perspectives on cavernous malformations, AVMs, and bypasses for complex aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(5):14091425.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Wang AS, Campos JK, Colby GP, Coon AL, Lin LM. Cerebral aneurysm treatment trends in National Inpatient Sample 2007-2016: endovascular therapies favored over surgery. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(10):957963.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Mehta T, Datta N, Patel S, Mehta K, Hussain M, Kureshi I, et al. Trends in endovascular treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages. Intervent Neurol. 2017;6(3-4):236241.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28(1):1420.

  • 20

    Schievink WI, Wijdicks EF, Piepgras DG, Chu CP, O’Fallon WM, Whisnant JP. The poor prognosis of ruptured intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation. J Neurosurg. 1995;82(5):791795.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Okazaki T, Kuroda Y. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: intensive care for improving neurological outcome. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:28.

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1148 1148 165
Full Text Views 262 262 63
PDF Downloads 386 386 112
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0