Time trend analysis of database and registry use in the neurosurgical literature: evidence for the advance of registry science

View More View Less
  • 1 Neuroscience Institute, Carolina Neurosurgery & Spine Associates, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina;
  • | 2 Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
  • | 3 Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;
  • | 4 Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, New Jersey;
  • | 5 Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee;
  • | 6 Duke Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina;
  • | 7 Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania;
  • | 8 Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina;
  • | 9 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah;
  • | 10 Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky; and
  • | 11 Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
USD  $515.00
USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Hoque DME, Kumari V, Hoque M, Ruseckaite R, Romero L, Evans SM. Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0183667.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Williams WG. Uses and limitations of registry and academic databases. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu. 2010;13(1):6670.

  • 3

    The impact of big data in neurosurgery. AANS Neurosurgeon. April 10, 2019.Accessed October 14, 2021. https://aansneurosurgeon.org/aansstudent/the-impact-of-big-data-in-neurosurgery/

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Claus CF, Lytle E, Carr DA, Tong D. Big data registries in spine surgery research: the lurking dangers. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021;26(3):103105.

  • 5

    Raju B, Jumah F, Ashraf O, Narayan V, Gupta G, Sun H, et al. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence: a field guide for neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg. 2021;135(2):373383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Walicke P, Abosch A, Asher A, Barker FG II, Ghogawala Z, Harbaugh R, et al. Launching effectiveness research to guide practice in neurosurgery: a National Institute Neurological Disorders and Stroke workshop report. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(4):505514.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Oravec CS, Motiwala M, Reed K, Kondziolka D, Barker FG II, Michael LM II, Klimo P Jr. Big data research in neurosurgery: a critical look at this popular new study design. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(5):728746.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Karhade AV, Larsen AMG, Cote DJ, Dubois HM, Smith TR. National databases for neurosurgical outcomes research: options, strengths, and limitations. Neurosurgery. 2018;83(3):333344.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Davis K, Minckas N, Bond V, Clark CJ, Colbourn T, Drabble SJ, et al. Beyond interviews and focus groups: a framework for integrating innovative qualitative methods into randomised controlled trials of complex public health interventions. Trials. 2019;20(1):329.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Jamjoom AAB, Gane AB, Demetriades AK. Randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery: an observational analysis of trial discontinuation and publication outcome. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):857866.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Spiotta AM. Twinkle, twinkle little STAR, how I wonder what you are: the case for high-quality, large-scale, “real-world” databases. Letter. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(2):E271E272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Kim HS, Lee S, Kim JH. Real-world evidence versus randomized controlled trial: clinical research based on electronic medical records. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(34):e213.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Bydon M, Schirmer CM, Oermann EK, Kitagawa RS, Pouratian N, Davies J, et al. Big data defined: a practical review for neurosurgeons. World Neurosurg. 2020;133:e842e849.

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Ryo M, Rillig MC. Statistically reinforced machine learning for nonlinear patterns and variable interactions. Ecosphere. 2017;8(11):e01976.

  • 15

    Anumula N, Sanelli PC. Physician Quality Reporting System. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(11):20002001.

  • 16

    Gillam S, Siriwardena N. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: QOF—Transforming General Practice. CRC Press;2018.

  • 17

    Harbaugh CM, Cooper JN. Administrative databases. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2018;27(6):353360.

  • 18

    Groth SS, Habermann EB, Massarweh NN. United States administrative databases and cancer registries for thoracic surgery health services research. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(3):636644.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide. 4th ed. AHRQ; 2020.Accessed October 14, 2021. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/registries-evaluating-patient-outcomes-4th-edition.pdf

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Bhatt DL, Drozda JP Jr, Shahian DM, Chan PS, Fonarow GC, Heidenreich PA, et al. ACC/AHA/STS statement on the future of registries and the performance measurement enterprise: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(20):22302245.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Gologorsky Y, Knightly JJ, Chi JH, Groff MW. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database does not accurately reflect surgical indications for fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(6):984993.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Kurian SJ, Yolcu YU, Zreik J, Alvi MA, Freedman BA, Bydon M. Institutional databases may underestimate the risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions compared to national databases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;33(6):845853.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Murphy M, Alavi K, Maykel J. Working with existing databases. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(1):511.

  • 24

    Bilimoria KY, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Ko CY. The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):683690.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    National Cancer Institute NC. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2013. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2013/browse_csr.php

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Tsiklidis EJ, Sims C, Sinno T, Diamond SL. Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and machine learning to predict trauma patient mortality at admission. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0242166.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson WG. The comparative assessment and improvement of quality of surgical care in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):2027.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Asher AL, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Parker SL, Davies JM, Selden N, et al. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).2014;39(22)(suppl 1):S106S116.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    McGirt MJ, Speroff T, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr, Asher AL. The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E6.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    NeuroPoint Alliance. Participate in the NeuroPoint’s QOD Spine Surgery Registry. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://www.neuropoint.org/registries/qod-spine/#1519913083389-a5b639c4-145e

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    NeuroPoint Alliance. Current QOD Registries. Accessed October 14, 2021. https://www.neuropoint.org/registries/qod/

  • 32

    Asher AL, McGirt MJ, Glassman SD, Groman R, Resnick DK, Mehrlich M, et al. Regulatory considerations for prospective patient care registries: lessons learned from the National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;34(1):E5.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA, Bauer MS, Stall R. Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007;2:42.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 508 508 58
Full Text Views 151 151 26
PDF Downloads 147 147 46
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0