Letter to the Editor. What are the odds: worse outcomes with IONM?

View More View Less
  • 1 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
  • | 2 University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL
  • | 3 Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, MN
  • | 4 University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Illustration from Schneider et al. (pp 205–214). Copyright Elyssa Siegel. Published with permission.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Wilson TJ, Hamrick F, Alzahrani S, et al. Analysis of the effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring during resection of benign nerve sheath tumors on gross-total resection and neurological complications. J Neurosurg. 2021;135(4):12311240.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Holdefer RN, Skinner SA. Motor evoked potential recovery with surgeon interventions and neurologic outcomes: a meta-analysis and structural causal model for spine deformity surgeries. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(7):15561566.

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    MacDonald DB. Overview on criteria for MEP monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2017;34(1):411.

  • 4

    Skinner SA, Holdefer RN. The intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring team. In: Deletis V, Shils JL, Sala F, Seidel K, eds. Neurophysiology in Neurosurgery: A Modern Approach.2nd ed. Elsevier;2020:623635.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 37 37 37
Full Text Views 24 24 24
PDF Downloads 28 28 28
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0