An artists depiction of a proposed method to deliver endovascular care via a teleoperated robot in space. A patient located on a satellite orbiting the Earth is undergoing a telesurgical endovascular intervention via the CorPath device. Real-time angiography images are beamed back to Earth, where an operator (in this case, a humanoid robot) is controlling the robot over a long distance. Copyright Gavin W. Britz. Published with permission. See the article by Panesar et al. (pp 971–978).
ACCOMPANYING EDITORIAL DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.JNS192195.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 29, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739.
Disclosures Dr. Lumsden is a consultant for and holds stock options in Conrindus Inc.
Adeoye O, Albright KC, Carr BG, Wolff C, Mullen MT, Abruzzo T, et al.: Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States. Stroke 45:3019–3024, 2014
Aghaebrahim A, Streib C, Rangaraju S, Kenmuir CL, Giurgiutiu DV, Horev A, et al.: Streamlining door to recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg 9:340–345, 2017
Akins PT, Amar AP, Pakbaz RS, Fields JD: Complications of endovascular treatment for acute stroke in the SWIFT trial with solitaire and Merci devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:524–528, 2014
Albers GW, Lansberg MG, Kemp S, Tsai JP, Lavori P, Christensen S, et al.: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of endovascular therapy following imaging evaluation for ischemic stroke (DEFUSE 3). Int J Stroke 12:896–905, 2017
Beyar R, Gruberg L, Deleanu D, Roguin A, Almagor Y, Cohen S, et al.: Remote-control percutaneous coronary interventions: concept, validation, and first-in-humans pilot clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:296–300, 2006
Britz GW, Tomas J, Lumsden A: Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery [epub ahead of print], 2019
Campbell BCV, Donnan GA, Lees KR, Hacke W, Khatri P, Hill MD, et al.: Endovascular stent thrombectomy: the new standard of care for large vessel ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol 14:846–854, 2015
Desai SM, Haussen DC, Aghaebrahim A, Al-Bayati AR, Santos R, Nogueira RG, et al.: Thrombectomy 24 hours after stroke: beyond DAWN. J Neurointerv Surg 10:1039–1042, 2018
Emberson J, Lees KR, Lyden P, Blackwell L, Albers G, Bluhmki E, et al.: Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet 384:1929– 1935, 2014
Falsini G, Calchetti B, Liistro F, Linoli G, Picchi A, Angioli P, et al.: [The dawn era in the management of acute ischemic stroke and its health policy implications. Should interventional cardiologists be involved?] G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 20:258–264, 2019 (Italian)
Fargen KM, Arthur AS, Leslie-Mazwi T, Garner RM, Aschenbrenner CA, Wolfe SQ, et al.: A survey of burnout and professional satisfaction among United States neurointerventionalists. J Neurointerv Surg 11:1100–1104, 2019
Froehler MT, Saver JL, Zaidat OO, Jahan R, Aziz-Sultan MA, Klucznik RP, et al.: Interhospital transfer before thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS Registry (Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischemic Stroke). Circulation 136:2311–2321, 2017
Gascou G, Lobotesis K, Machi P, Maldonado I, Vendrell JF, Riquelme C, et al.: Stent retrievers in acute ischemic stroke: complications and failures during the perioperative period. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:734–740, 2014
Goyal M, Jadhav AP, Bonafe A, Diener H, Mendes Pereira V, Levy E, et al.: Analysis of workflow and time to treatment and the effects on outcome in endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke: results from the SWIFT PRIME randomized controlled trial. Radiology 279:888–897, 2016
Grotta JC: Interhospital transfer of stroke patients for endovascular treatment. Circulation 139:1578–1580, 2019
Grotta JC, Lyden P, Brott T: Rethinking training and distribution of vascular neurology interventionists in the era of thrombectomy. Stroke 48:2313–2317, 2017
Gupta R, Horev A, Nguyen T, Gandhi D, Wisco D, Glenn BA, et al.: Higher volume endovascular stroke centers have faster times to treatment, higher reperfusion rates and higher rates of good clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 5:294–297, 2013
Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, Butler J, Dracup K, Ezekowitz MD, et al.: Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123:933–944, 2011
Howard G, Goff DC: Population shifts and the future of stroke: forecasts of the future burden of stroke. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1268:14–20, 2012
Lancet: 21st century management and prevention of stroke. Lancet 392:1167, 2018
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC: Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14–21, 2004
Lanzer P, Cremonesi A, Widimský P: Perspectives on training requirements for interventional cardiologists to perform endovascular interventions for acute ischaemic stroke. EuroIntervention 14:1357–1360, 2019
Leira EC, Kaskie B, Froehler MT, Adams HP Jr: The growing shortage of vascular neurologists in the era of health reform. Stroke 44:822–827, 2013
Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, Harrison J, Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, et al.: Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:1320–1327, 2017
Maor E, Eleid MF, Gulati R, Lerman A, Sandhu GS: Current and future use of robotic devices to perform percutaneous coronary interventions: a review. J Am Heart Assoc 6:e006239, 2017
Mohamad NF, Hastrup S, Rasmussen M, Andersen MS, Johnsen SP, Andersen G, et al.: Bypassing primary stroke centre reduces delay and improves outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion. Eur Stroke J 1:85–92, 2016
Nikoubashman O, Pauli F, Schürmann K, Othman AE, Bach JP, Wiesmann M, et al.: Transfer of stroke patients impairs eligibility for endovascular stroke treatment. J Neuroradiol 45:49–53, 2018
Ovbiagele B, Goldstein LB, Higashida RT, Howard VJ, Johnston SC, Khavjou OA, et al.: Forecasting the future of stroke in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Stroke 44:2361–2375, 2013
Patel TM, Shah SC, Pancholy SB: Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 14:53–58, 2019
Pierot L, Jayaraman MV, Szikora I, Hirsch JA, Baxter B, Miyachi S, et al.: Standards of practice in acute ischemic stroke intervention: international recommendations. J Neurointerv Surg 10:1121–1126, 2018
Raison N, Khan MS, Challacombe B: Telemedicine in surgery: what are the opportunities and hurdles to realising the potential? Curr Urol Rep 16:43, 2015
Rinaldo L, Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA: Transfer to high-volume centers associated with reduced mortality after endovascular treatment of acute stroke. Stroke 48:1316–1321, 2017
Saber H, Navi BB, Grotta JC, Kamel H, Bambhroliya A, Vahidy FS, et al.: Real-world treatment trends in endovascular stroke therapy. Stroke 50:683–689, 2019
Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, et al.: Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 316:1279–1288, 2016
Shah S, Xian Y, Sheng S, Zachrison KS, Saver JL, Sheth KN, et al.: Use, temporal trends, and outcomes of endovascular therapy after interhospital transfer in the United States. Circulation 139:1568–1577, 2019
Shenai MB, Tubbs RS, Guthrie BL, Cohen-Gadol AA: Virtual interactive presence for real-time, long-distance surgical collaboration during complex microsurgical procedures. J Neurosurg 121:277–284, 2014
Smilowitz NR, Moses JW, Sosa FA, Lerman B, Qureshi Y, Dalton KE, et al.: Robotic-enhanced PCI compared to the traditional manual approach. J Invasive Cardiol 26:318–321, 2014
Smilowitz NR, Weisz G: Robotic-assisted angioplasty: current status and future possibilities. Curr Cardiol Rep 14:642–646, 2012
Smitson CC, Ang L, Pourdjabbar A, Reeves R, Patel M, Mahmud E: Safety and feasibility of a novel, second-generation robotic-assisted system for percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human report. J Invasive Cardiol 30:152–156, 2018
Sun CHJ, Nogueira RG, Glenn BA, Connelly K, Zimmermann S, Anda K, et al.: “Picture to puncture”: a novel time metric to enhance outcomes in patients transferred for endovascular reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke. Circulation 127:1139–1148, 2013
Walters D, Reeves RR, Patel M, Naghi J, Ang L, Mahmud E: Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93:613–617, 2019
Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, et al.: Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:1596–1600, 2013
White CJ: Acute stroke intervention: the role of interventional cardiologists. J Am Coll Cardiol 73:1491–1493, 2019
Wilson TA, Leslie-Mazwi T, Hirsch JA, Frey C, Kim TE, Spiotta AM, et al.: A multicenter study evaluating the frequency and time requirement of mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 10:235–239, 2018
Wirz R, Torres LG, Swaney PJ, Gilbert H, Alterovitz R, Webster RJ III, et al.: An experimental feasibility study on robotic endonasal telesurgery. Neurosurgery 76:479–484, 2015
Wu TC, Parker SA, Jagolino A, Yamal JM, Bowry R, Thomas A, et al.: Telemedicine can replace the neurologist on a mobile stroke unit. Stroke 48:493–496, 2017
Xu S, Perez M, Yang K, Perrenot C, Felblinger J, Hubert J: Determination of the latency effects on surgical performance and the acceptable latency levels in telesurgery using the dV-Trainer® simulator. Surg Endosc 28:2569–2576, 2014
Zaidat OO, Lazzaro M, McGinley E, Edgell RC, Nguyen T, Linfante I, et al.: Demand-supply of neurointerventionalists for endovascular ischemic stroke therapy. Neurology 79 (13 Suppl 1):S35–S41, 2012
Zerna C, Thomalla G, Campbell BCV, Rha JH, Hill MD: Current practice and future directions in the diagnosis and acute treatment of ischaemic stroke. Lancet 392:1247–1256, 2018
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1966 | 540 | 42 |
Full Text Views | 308 | 51 | 2 |
PDF Downloads | 261 | 58 | 2 |
EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |