Editorial. The delivery of stroke intervention in the community: is telerobotic endovascular surgery the solution?

View More View Less
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Nicholas C. Bambakidis: nicholas.bambakidis2@uhhospitals.org.

ACCOMPANYING ARTICLE DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 29, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.JNS192195.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest.

  • 1

    Adeoye O, Nyström KV, Yavagal DR, Luciano J, Nogueira RG, Zorowitz RD, : Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: a 2019 update. Stroke 50:e187e210, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, : A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:1120, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Britz GW, Tomas J, Lumsden A: Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery [epub ahead of print], 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Campbell BC, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, Dewey HM, Churilov L, Yassi N, : Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 372:10091018, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, : Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:10191030, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, de Miquel MA, Molina CA, Rovira A, : Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:22962306, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, Harrison J, Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, : Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:13201327, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Panesar SS, Volpi JJ, Lumsden A, Desai V, Kleiman NS, Sample TL, : Telerobotic stroke intervention: a novel solution to the care dissemination dilemma. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print November 29, 2019. DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191739]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Patel TM, Shah SC, Pancholy SB: Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 14:5358, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, Diener HC, Levy EI, Pereira VM, : Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:22852295, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, : Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA 316:12791288, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Shah S, Xian Y, Sheng S, Zachrison KS, Saver JL, Sheth KN, : Use, temporal trends, and outcomes of endovascular therapy after interhospital transfer in the United States. Circulation 139:15681577, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, : Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 61:15961600, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Adeoye O, Albright KC, Carr BG, Wolff C, Mullen MT, Abruzzo T, : Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States. Stroke 45:30193024, 2014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, Yalvac E, Reeves R, Mahmud E: First case of robotic percutaneous vascular intervention for below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease. J Invasive Cardiol 28:E128E131, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Britz GW, Tomas J, Lumsden A: Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery [epub ahead of print], 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Fargen KM, Arthur AS, Leslie-Mazwi T, Garner RM, Aschenbrenner CA, Wolfe SQ, : A survey of burnout and professional satisfaction among United States neurointerventionalists. J Neurointerv Surg 11:11001104, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Gupta R, Horev A, Nguyen T, Gandhi D, Wisco D, Glenn BA, : Higher volume endovascular stroke centers have faster times to treatment, higher reperfusion rates and higher rates of good clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg 5:294297, 2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW: Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154:21342136, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC: Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:1421, 2004

  • 8

    Mahmud E, Dominguez A, Bahadorani J: First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 88:565570, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, Harrison J, Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, : Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI Study (Complex Robotically Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:13201327, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmar P, Deutschmann H, Hafner F, Rief P, : Feasibility and safety of robotic peripheral vascular interventions: result of the RAPID trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9:20582064, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Memon S, Heriot AG, Murphy DG, Bressel M, Lynch AC: Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:20952101, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Panesar SS, Britz GW: Endovascular robotics: the future of cerebrovascular surgery. World Neurosurg 129:327329, 2019

  • 13

    Patel TM, Shah SC, Pancholy SB: Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine 14:5358, 2019

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR: Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60:3945, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 301 301 8
Full Text Views 62 62 1
PDF Downloads 80 80 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0