Letter to the Editor. Using Markov modeling to analyze endovascular coiling versus the Pipeline embolization device

Michael Karsy MD, PhD, MSc, Philipp Taussky MD, and Ramesh Grandhi MD
View More View Less
  • Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Ramesh Grandhi: neuropub@hsc.utah.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 9, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.JNS19544.

Disclosures Dr. Taussky reports being a consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Grandhi reports being a consultant for Balt, Medtronic Neurovascular, and Cerenovus.

  • 1

    Hong KS, Saver JL: Quantifying the value of stroke disability outcomes: WHO global burden of disease project disability weights for each level of the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 40:38283833, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, Boccardi E, Bonafe A, Cekirge S, : International retrospective study of the Pipeline Embolization Device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:108115, 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Malhotra A, Wu X, Miller T, Matouk CC, Sanelli P, Gandhi D: Comparative effectiveness analysis of Pipeline device versus coiling in unruptured aneurysms smaller than 10 mm. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print January 11, 2019. DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181080]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Twitchell S, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Reese J, Karsy M, Eli IM, Guan J, : Analysis of cerebrovascular aneurysm treatment cost: retrospective cohort comparison of clipping, coiling, and flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus 44(5):E3, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 1

    Malhotra A, Wu X, Forman HP, Grossetta Nardini HK, Matouk CC, Gandhi D, : Growth and rupture risk of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 167:2633, 2017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Malhotra A, Wu X, Forman HP, Matouk CC, Gandhi D, Sanelli P: Management of tiny unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative effectiveness analysis. JAMA Neurol 75:2734, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Malhotra A, Wu X, Geng B, Hersey D, Gandhi D, Sanelli P: Management of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a survey of neuroradiologists. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:875880, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Petr O, Brinjikji W, Cloft H, Kallmes DF, Lanzino G: Current trends and results of endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single institution in the flow-diverter era. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:11061113, 2016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Twitchell S, Abou-Al-Shaar H, Reese J, Karsy M, Eli IM, Guan J, : Analysis of cerebrovascular aneurysm treatment cost: retrospective cohort comparison of clipping, coiling, and flow diversion. Neurosurg Focus 44(5):E3, 2018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 303 227 6
Full Text Views 32 20 2
PDF Downloads 49 21 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0