Endoscopic versus open microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis

Restricted access

 

OBJECTIVE

Microvascular decompression (MVD) is commonly used in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) with positive clinical outcomes. Fully endoscopic MVD (E-MVD) has been proposed as an effective minimally invasive alternative, but a comparative review of the two approaches has not been conducted. The authors performed a meta-analysis of studies, comparing patient outcome rates and complications for the open versus the endoscopic technique.

METHODS

The PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid databases were searched for studies published from database inception to 2017. The search terms used included, but were not limited to, “open microvascular decompression,” “microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia,” and “endoscopic decompression for trigeminal neuralgia.” Criteria for inclusion of studies in the meta-analysis were established as follows: adult patients, clinical studies with ≥ 10 patients (excluding case studies to obtain a higher volume of outcome rates), utilization of open MVD or E-MVD to treat TN, craniotomy and retrosigmoid incision, English-language studies, and articles that listed pain relief outcomes (complete, very good, partial, or absent), recurrence rate (number of patients), and complications (paresis, hearing loss, CSF leakage, cerebellar damage, infection, death). Relevant references from the chosen articles were also included.

RESULTS

From a larger pool of 1039 studies, 23 articles were selected for review: 13 on traditional MVD and 10 on E-MVD. The total number of patients was 6749, of which 5783 patients (and 5802 procedures) had undergone MVD and 993 patients (and procedures) had undergone E-MVD. Analyzed data included postoperative pain relief outcome (complete or good pain relief vs partial or no pain relief), and rates of recurrence and complications including facial paralysis, weakness, or paresis; hearing loss; auditory and facial nerve damage; cerebrospinal fluid leakage; infection; cerebellar damage; and death.

Good pain relief was achieved in 81% of MVD patients and 88% of E-MVD patients, with a mean recurrence rate of 14% and 9%, respectively. Average rates of reported complications were statistically lower in E-MVD than in MVD approaches, including facial paresis or weakness, hearing loss, cerebellar damage, infection, and death, whereas cerebrospinal fluid leakage was similar. The overall incidence of complications was 19% for MVD and 8% for E-MVD.

CONCLUSIONS

The reviewed literature revealed similar clinical outcomes with respect to pain relief for MVD and E-MVD. The recurrence rate was lower in E-MVD studies, though not significantly so, and the incidence of complications, notably facial paresis and hearing loss, were statistically higher for MVD than for E-MVD. Based on these results, the use of endoscopy to perform MVD for TN appears to offer at least as good a surgical outcome as the more commonly used open MVD, with the possible added advantages of having a shorter operative time, smaller craniotomy, and lower recurrence rates. The authors advise caution in interpreting these data given the asymmetry in the sample size between the two groups and the relative novelty of the E-MVD approach.

ABBREVIATIONS CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; E-MVD = endoscopic MVD; MVD = microvascular decompression; TN = trigeminal neuralgia.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Nirmeen Zagzoog: Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada. nirmeen.zagzoog@medportal.ca.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 7, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.JNS172690.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Artz GJHux FJLarouere MJBojrab DIBabu SPieper DR: Endoscopic vascular decompression. Otol Neurotol 29:99510002008

  • 2

    Bakker NAVan Dijk JMImmenga SWagemakers MMetzemaekers JD: Repeat microvascular decompression for recurrent idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 121:9369392014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Barker FG IIJannetta PJBissonette DJLarkins MVJho HD: The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 334:107710831996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Bohman LEPierce JStephen JHSandhu SLee JY: Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technique review and early outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 37(4):E182014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Broggi GFerroli PFranzini AServello DDones I: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: comments on a series of 250 cases, including 10 patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:59642000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Chen MJZhang WJYang CWu YQZhang ZYWang Y: Endoscopic neurovascular perspective in microvascular decompression of trigeminal neuralgia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 36:4564612008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    El-Garem HFBadr-El-Dine MTalaat AMMagnan J: Endoscopy as a tool in minimally invasive trigeminal neuralgia surgery. Otol Neurotol 23:1321352002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Forbes JCooper CJermakowicz WNeimat JKonrad P: Microvascular decompression: salient surgical principles and technical nuances. J Vis Exp (53):e25902011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Gao JFu YGuo SKLi BXu ZX: Efficacy and prognostic value of partial sensory rhizotomy and microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: a comparative study. Med Sci Monit 23:228422912017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Halpern CHLang SSLee JY: Fully endoscopic microvascular decompression: our early experience. Minim Invasive Surg 2013:7394322013

  • 11

    Hitotsumatsu TMatsushima TInoue T: Microvascular decompression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, hemifacial spasm, and glossopharyngeal neuralgia: three surgical approach variations: technical note. Neurosurgery 53:143614432003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jannetta PJ: Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 26 (1 Suppl):1591621967

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kabatas SAlbayrak SBCansever THepgul KT: Microvascular decompression as a surgical management for trigeminal neuralgia: a critical review of the literature. Neurol India 57:1341382009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Kabil MSEby JBShahinian HK: Endoscopic vascular decompression versus microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 48:2072122005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Katusic SBeard CMBergstralh EKurland LT: Incidence and clinical features of trigeminal neuralgia, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945–1984. Ann Neurol 27:89951990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kher YYadav NYadav YRParihar VRatre SBajaj J: Endoscopic vascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia. Turk Neurosurg 27:99810062017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lee JYKPierce JTSandhu SKPetrov DYang AI: Endoscopic versus microscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: equivalent pain outcomes with possibly decreased postoperative headache after endoscopic surgery. J Neurosurg 126:167616842017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Liu JYuan YFang YZhang LXu XLLiu HJ: Microvascular decompression for atypical hemifacial spasm: lessons learned from a retrospective study of 12 cases. J Neurosurg 124:3974022016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Love SCoakham HB: Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and pathogenesis. Brain 124:234723602001

  • 20

    McLaughlin MRJannetta PJClyde BLSubach BRComey CHResnick DK: Microvascular decompression of cranial nerves: lessons learned after 4400 operations. J Neurosurg 90:181999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Mendoza NIllingworth RD: Trigeminal neuralgia treated by microvascular decompression: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Neurosurg 9:13191995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Miller JPMagill STAcar FBurchiel KJ: Predictors of long-term success after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 110:6206262009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Oesman CMooij JJ: Long-term follow-up of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Skull Base 21:3133222011

  • 24

    Olson SAtkinson LWeidmann M: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: recurrences and complications. J Clin Neurosci 12:7877892005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Pamir MNPeker S: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: a long-term follow-up study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 49:3423462006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Sandell TEide PK: Effect of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia patients with or without constant pain. Neurosurgery 63:931002008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Shin JCKim YCPark CIChung UH: Intraoperative monitoring of microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm. Yonsei Med J 37:2092131996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Simmons JHPrehn RS: Nocturnal bruxism as a protective mechanism against obstructive breathing during sleep. Sleep 31:A1992008 (Poster)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Teo CNakaji PMobbs RJ: Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59 (4 Suppl 2):E489E4902006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Tomasello FEsposito FAbbritti RVAngileri FFConti ACardali SM: Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: technical refinement for complication avoidance. World Neurosurg 94:26312016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Wei YPu CLi NCai YShang HZhao W: Long-term therapeutic effect of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: Kaplan-Meier analysis in a consecutive series of 425 patients. Turk Neurosurg 28:88932018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Yadav YRParihar VAgarwal MSherekar SBhatele P: Endoscopic vascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 54:1101142011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 115 115 115
Full Text Views 49 49 49
PDF Downloads 69 69 69
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar