Influence of pretreatment growth rate on Gamma Knife treatment response for vestibular schwannoma: a volumetric analysis

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to gain insight into the influence of the pretreatment growth rate on the volumetric tumor response and tumor control rates after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for incidental vestibular schwannoma (VS).

METHODS

All patients treated with GKRS at the Gamma Knife Center, ETZ Hospital, who exhibited a confirmed radiological progression of their VS after an initial observation period were included. Pre- and posttreatment MRI scans were volumetrically evaluated, and the volume doubling times (VDTs) prior to treatment were calculated. Posttreatment volumes were used to create an objective mathematical failure definition: 2 consecutive significant increases in tumor volume among 3 consecutive follow-up MRI scans. Spearman correlation, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to determine the influence of the VDT on the volumetric treatment response.

RESULTS

The resulting patient cohort contained 311 patients in whom the VDT was calculated. This cohort had a median follow-up time of 60 months after GKRS. Of these 311 patients, 35 experienced loss of tumor control after GKRS. The pretreatment growth rate and the relative volume changes, calculated at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years following treatment, showed no statistically significant correlation. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that slow-growing tumors, with a VDT equal to or longer than the median VDT of 15 months, had calculated 5- and 10-year control rates of 97.3% and 86.0%, respectively, whereas fast-growing tumors, with a VDT less than the median growth rate, had control rates of 85.5% and 67.6%, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.001). The influence of the VDT on tumor control was also determined by employing the Cox regression analysis. The resulting model presented a significant (p = 0.045) effect of the VDT on the hazard rates of loss of tumor control.

CONCLUSIONS

By employing a unique, large database with long follow-up times, the authors were able to accurately investigate the influence of the pretreatment VS growth rate on the volumetric GKRS treatment response. The authors have found a predictive model that illustrates the negative influence of the pretreatment VS growth rate on the efficacy of radiosurgery treatment. The resulting tumor control rates confirm the high efficacy of GKRS for slow-growing VS. However, fast-growing tumors showed significantly lower control rates. For these cases, different treatment strategies may be considered.

ABBREVIATIONS GKRS = Gamma Knife radiosurgery; VDT = volume doubling time; VS = vestibular schwannoma.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Patrick P. J. H. Langenhuizen: ETZ Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands. p.langenhuizen@etz.nl.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 16, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.JNS18516.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Chopra RKondziolka DNiranjan ALunsford LDFlickinger JC: Long-term follow-up of acoustic schwannoma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:8458512007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Flickinger JCKondziolka DNiranjan AMaitz AVoynov GLunsford LD: Acoustic neuroma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:2252302004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Fu VXVerheul JBBeute GNLeenstra SKunst HPMMulder JJS: Retreatment of vestibular schwannoma with Gamma Knife radiosurgery: clinical outcome, tumor control, and review of literature. J Neurosurg 129:1371452018

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Hastak KBhutra SParry RFord JM: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, an effective radiosensitizer in lung and pancreatic cancers. Oncotarget 8:26344263552017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Hayhurst CZadeh G: Tumor pseudoprogression following radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Neuro Oncol 14:87922012

  • 6

    Klijn SVerheul JBBeute GNLeenstra SMulder JJSKunst HPM: Gamma Knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: evaluation of tumor control and its predictors in a large patient cohort in The Netherlands. J Neurosurg 124:161916262016

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Kondziolka DWolf A: Commentary: ten-year follow-up on tumor growth and hearing in patients observed with an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma. Neurosurgery 80:57592017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Larjani SMonsalves EPebdani HKrischek BGentili FCusimano M: Identifying predictors of early growth response and adverse radiation effects of vestibular schwannomas to radiosurgery. PLoS One 9:e1108232014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Marston APJacob JTCarlson MLPollock BEDriscoll CLWLink MJ: Pretreatment growth rate as a predictor of tumor control following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for sporadic vestibular schwannoma. J Neurosurg 127:3803872017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Miller TLau TVasan RDanner CYoussef ASvan Loveren H: Reporting success rates in the treatment of vestibular schwannomas: are we accounting for the natural history? J Clin Neurosci 21:9149182014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mindermann TSchlegel I: How to distinguish tumor growth from transient expansion of vestibular schwannomas following Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:112111232014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Myrseth EMøller PPedersen PHLund-Johansen M: Vestibular schwannoma: surgery or gamma knife radiosurgery? A prospective, nonrandomized study. Neurosurgery 64:6546632009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Nakaya KNiranjan AKondziolka DKano HKhan AANettel B: Gamma Knife radiosurgery for benign tumors with symptoms from brainstem compression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 77:9889952010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Niu NNNiemierko ALarvie MCurtin HLoeffler JSMcKenna MJ: Pretreatment growth rate predicts radiation response in vestibular schwannomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 89:1131192014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Pawlik TMKeyomarsi K: Role of cell cycle in mediating sensitivity to radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:9289422004

  • 16

    Régis JDelsanti CRoche PH: Editorial. Vestibular schwannoma radiosurgery: progression or pseudoprogression? J Neurosurg 127:3743792017

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Timmer FCAMulder JJSHanssens PEJvan Overbeeke JJDonders RTCremers CWRJ: Gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: identification of predictors for continued tumor growth and the influence of documented tumor growth preceding radiation treatment. Laryngoscope 121:183418382011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    van de Langenberg Rde Bondt BJNelemans PJBaumert BGStokroos RJ: Follow-up assessment of vestibular schwannomas: volume quantification versus two-dimensional measurements. Neuroradiology 51:5175242009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    van de Langenberg RDohmen AJCde Bondt BJNelemans PJBaumert BGStokroos RJ: Volume changes after stereotactic LINAC radiotherapy in vestibular schwannoma: control rate and growth patterns. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:3433492012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Varughese JKBreivik CNWentzel-Larsen TLund-Johansen M: Growth of untreated vestibular schwannoma: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 116:7067122012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Varughese JKWentzel-Larsen TPedersen PHMahesparan RLund-Johansen M: Gamma knife treatment of growing vestibular schwannoma in Norway: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e161e1662012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Wang HMu XHe HZhang XD: Cancer radiosensitizers. Trends Pharmacol Sci 39:24482018

  • 23

    Wangerid TBartek J JrSvensson MFörander P: Long-term quality of life and tumour control following gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 156:3893962014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Yeung AHSughrue MEKane AJTihan TCheung SWParsa AT: Radiobiology of vestibular schwannomas: mechanisms of radioresistance and potential targets for therapeutic sensitization. Neurosurg Focus 27(6):E22009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Yue WYClark JJTelisak MHansen MR: Inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase activity enhances vestibular schwannoma cell sensitivity to γ irradiation. Neurosurgery 73:5065162013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Zhu LWu KMa SZhang S: HDAC inhibitors: a new radiosensitizer for non-small-cell lung cancer. Tumori 101:2572622015

TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 75 75 75
Full Text Views 24 24 24
PDF Downloads 37 37 37
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar