Gross-total resection (GTR) of craniopharyngiomas (CPs) is potentially curative and is often the goal of surgery, but endocrinopathy generally results if the stalk is sacrificed. In some cases, GTR can be attempted while still preserving the stalk; however, stalk manipulation or devascularization may cause endocrinopathy and this strategy risks leaving behind small tumor remnants that can recur.
A retrospective review of a prospective cohort of patients who underwent initial resection of CP using the endoscopic endonasal approach over a period of 12 years at Weill Cornell Medical College, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, was performed. Postresection integrity of the stalk was retrospectively assessed using operative notes, videos, and postoperative MRI. Tumors were classified based on location into type I (sellar), type II (sellar-suprasellar), and type III (purely suprasellar). Pre- and postoperative endocrine function, tumor location, body mass index, rate of GTR, radiation therapy, and complications were reviewed.
A total of 54 patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal procedures for first-time resection of CP were identified. The stalk was preserved in 33 (61%) and sacrificed in 21 (39%) patients. GTR was achieved in 24 patients (73%) with stalk preservation and 21 patients (100%) with stalk sacrifice (p = 0.007). Stalk-preservation surgery achieved GTR and maintained completely normal pituitary function in only 4 (12%) of 33 patients. Permanent postoperative diabetes insipidus was present in 16 patients (49%) with stalk preservation and in 20 patients (95%) following stalk sacrifice (p = 0.002). In the stalk-preservation group, rates of progression and radiation were higher with intentional subtotal resection or near-total resection compared to GTR (67% vs 0%, p < 0.001, and 100% vs 12.5%, p < 0.001, respectively). However, for the subgroup of patients in whom GTR was achieved, stalk preservation did not lead to significantly higher rates of recurrence (12.5%) compared with those in whom it was sacrificed (5%, p = 0.61), and stalk preservation prevented anterior pituitary insufficiency in 33% and diabetes insipidus in 50%.
While the decision to preserve the stalk reduces the rate of postoperative endocrinopathy by roughly 50%, nevertheless significant dysfunction of the anterior and posterior pituitary often ensues. The decision to preserve the stalk does not guarantee preserved endocrine function and comes with a higher risk of progression and need for adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, to reduce postoperative endocrinopathy attempts should be made to preserve the stalk if GTR can be achieved.
Correspondence Theodore H. Schwartz: Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. email@example.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 23, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.6.JNS18901.Disclosures Dr. Souweidane reports being a consultant for Aesculap, and Dr. Schwartz reports being a consultant for Elliquence and receiving stock options from Visionsense.
CavalloLM, FrankG, CappabiancaP, SolariD, MazzatentaD, VillaA, : The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients. 121:100–113, 201410.3171/2014.3.JNS13152124785324)| false
CavalloLM, SolariD, EspositoF, VillaA, MinnitiG, CappabiancaP: The role of the endoscopic endonasal route in the management of craniopharyngiomas. 82 (6 Suppl):S32–S40, 201410.1016/j.wneu.2014.07.023)| false
ChengJFanYCenB: Effect of preserving the pituitary stalk during resection of craniopharyngioma in children on the diabetes insipidus and relapse rates and long-term outcomes. J Craniofac Surg28:e591–e5952017
ChengJ, FanY, CenB: Effect of preserving the pituitary stalk during resection of craniopharyngioma in children on the diabetes insipidus and relapse rates and long-term outcomes. 28:e591–e595, 201710.1097/SCS.0000000000003920)| false
CombsSE, ThilmannC, HuberPE, HoessA, DebusJ, Schulz-ErtnerD: Achievement of long-term local control in patients with craniopharyngiomas using high precision stereotactic radiotherapy. 109:2308–2314, 20071746917610.1002/cncr.22703)| false
DhoYSKimYHSeYBHanDHKimJHParkCK: Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print September292017. DOI: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS162143]
DhoYS, KimYH, SeYB, HanDH, KimJH, ParkCK, : Endoscopic endonasal approach for craniopharyngioma: the importance of the relationship between pituitary stalk and tumor. 29, 2017. DOI: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS162143])| false
JeswaniSNuñoMWuABonertVCarmichaelJDBlackKL: Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. J Neurosurg124:627–6382016
JeswaniS, NuñoM, WuA, BonertV, CarmichaelJD, BlackKL, : Comparative analysis of outcomes following craniotomy and expanded endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of craniopharyngioma and related tumors: a single-institution study. 124:627–638, 20162636127610.3171/2015.3.JNS142254)| false
JungTYJungSChoiJEMoonKSKimIYKangSS: Adult craniopharyngiomas: surgical results with a special focus on endocrinological outcomes and recurrence according to pituitary stalk preservation. J Neurosurg111:572–5772009
JungTY, JungS, ChoiJE, MoonKS, KimIY, KangSS: Adult craniopharyngiomas: surgical results with a special focus on endocrinological outcomes and recurrence according to pituitary stalk preservation. 111:572–577, 20091936125910.3171/2008.10.JNS0880)| false
KassamABGardnerPASnydermanCHCarrauRLMintzAHPrevedelloDM: Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg108:715–7282008
KassamAB, GardnerPA, SnydermanCH, CarrauRL, MintzAH, PrevedelloDM: Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. 108:715–728, 20081837725110.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0715)| false
LengLZGreenfieldJPSouweidaneMMAnandVKSchwartzTH: Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. Neurosurgery70:110–1242012
LengLZ, GreenfieldJP, SouweidaneMM, AnandVK, SchwartzTH: Endoscopic, endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas: analysis of outcome including extent of resection, cerebrospinal fluid leak, return to preoperative productivity, and body mass index. 70:110–124, 20122193794310.1227/NEU.0b013e31822e8ffc)| false
LiK, LuX, YangN, ZhengJ, HuangB, LiL: Association of pituitary stalk management with endocrine outcomes and recurrence in microsurgery of craniopharyngiomas: a meta-analysis. 136:20–24, 201510.1016/j.clineuro.2015.05.01926056807)| false
McCoulED, AnandVK, SinghA, NyquistGG, SchabergMR, SchwartzTH: Long-term effectiveness of a reconstructive protocol using the nasoseptal flap after endoscopic skull base surgery. 81:136–143, 201410.1016/j.wneu.2012.08.01123022644)| false
MinnitiG, SaranF, TraishD, SoomalR, SardellS, GonsalvesA, : Fractionated stereotactic conformal radiotherapy following conservative surgery in the control of craniopharyngiomas. 82:90–95, 20071716148310.1016/j.radonc.2006.11.005)| false
MoussazadehNPrabhuVBanderEDCusicRCTsiourisAJAnandVK: Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a case-matched single-institution analysis. Neurosurg Focus41(6):E72016
OmaySBAlmeidaJPChenYNShettySRLiangBNiS: Is the chiasm-pituitary corridor size important for achieving gross-total resection during endonasal endoscopic resection of craniopharyngiomas?J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print November242017. DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS163188]
OmaySB, AlmeidaJP, ChenYN, ShettySR, LiangB, NiS, : Is the chiasm-pituitary corridor size important for achieving gross-total resection during endonasal endoscopic resection of craniopharyngiomas?24, 2017. DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS163188])| false
PascualJMGonzález-LlanosFBarriosLRodaJM: Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas: topographical classification and surgical approach selection based on an extensive overview. Acta Neurochir (Wien)146:785–8022004
PascualJM, González-LlanosF, BarriosL, RodaJM: Intraventricular craniopharyngiomas: topographical classification and surgical approach selection based on an extensive overview. 146:785–802, 200410.1007/s00701-004-0295-315254801)| false
PugetS, GarnettM, WrayA, GrillJ, HabrandJL, BodaertN, : Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. 106 (1 Suppl):3–12, 200717233305)| false
QiS, LuY, PanJ, ZhangX, LongH, FanJ: Anatomic relations of the arachnoidea around the pituitary stalk: relevance for surgical removal of craniopharyngiomas. 153:785–796, 201110.1007/s00701-010-0940-y21271263)| false