Letter to the Editor. 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate implant for cranioplasty

Restricted access

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Article Information

Correspondence Chad R. Gordon: cgordon@jhmi.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online October 5, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS181895.

Disclosures Dr. Gordon is a consultant for Stryker and Longeviti Neuro Solutions.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

  • 1

    Gordon CRSantiago GFHuang JBergey GKLiu SArmand M: First in-human experience with complete integration of neuromodulation device within a customized cranial implant. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 15:39452018

  • 2

    Gordon CRYaremchuk MJ: Temporal augmentation with methyl methacrylate. Aesthet Surg J 31:8278332011

  • 3

    Huang GJZhong SSusarla SMSwanson EWHuang JGordon CR: Craniofacial reconstruction with poly(methyl methacrylate) customized cranial implants. J Craniofac Surg 26:64702015

  • 4

    Korhonen TKTetri SHuttunen JLindgren APiitulainen JMSerlo W: Predictors of primary autograft cranioplasty survival and resorption after craniectomy. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print May 11 2018. DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172013]

  • 5

    Malcolm JGMahmooth ZRindler RSAllen JWGrossberg JAPradilla G: Autologous cranioplasty is associated with increased reoperation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 116:60682018

  • 6

    Mims C: A hardware update for the human brain. Wall Street Journal. June 5 2017. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-hardware-update-for-the-human-brain-1496660400) [Accessed September 6 2018]

  • 7

    Morales-Gómez JAGarcia-Estrada ELeos-Bortoni JEDelgado-Brito MFlores-Huerta LEDe La Cruz-Arriaga AA: Cranioplasty with a low-cost customized polymethylmethacrylate implant using a desktop 3D printer. J Neurosurg [epub ahead of print June 15 2018. DOI: 10.3171/2017.12.JNS172574]

  • 8

    Santiago GFTerner JWolff ATeixeira JBrem HHuang J: Post-neurosurgical temporal deformities: various techniques for correction and associated complications. J Craniofac Surg [epub ahead of print] 2018

  • 9

    van de Vijfeijken SECMMünker TJAGSpijker RKarssemakers LHEVandertop WPBecking AG: Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 117:443452452.e1–452.e8 2018

  • 10

    Wolff ASantiago GFBelzberg MHuggins CLim MWeingart J: Adult cranioplasty reconstruction with customized cranial implants: preferred technique, timing, and biomaterials. J Craniofac Surg 29:8878942018

  • 11

    Zhong SHuang GJSusarla SMSwanson EWHuang JGordon CR: Quantitative analysis of dual-purpose, patient-specific craniofacial implants for correction of temporal deformity. Neurosurgery 11 (Suppl 2):2202292015

  • 1

    Cheng YKWeng HHYang JTLee MHWang TCChang CN: Factors affecting graft infection after cranioplasty. J Clin Neurosci 15:111511192008

  • 2

    Fan MCWang QLSun PZhan SHGuo PDeng WS: Cryopreservation of autologous cranial bone flaps for cranioplasty: a large sample retrospective study. World Neurosurg 109:e853e8592018

  • 3

    Gordon CRSantiago GFHuang JBergey GKLiu SArmand M: First in-human experience with complete integration of neuromodulation device within a customized cranial implant. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 15:39452018

  • 4

    Gordon CRYaremchuk MJ: Temporal augmentation with methyl methacrylate. Aesthet Surg J 31:8278332011

  • 5

    Honeybul SMorrison DAHo KMLind CRGeelhoed E: A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 126:81902017

  • 6

    Malcolm JGMahmooth ZRindler RSAllen JWGrossberg JAPradilla G: Autologous cranioplasty is associated with increased reoperation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 116:60682018

  • 7

    van de Vijfeijken SECMMünker TJAGSpijker RKarssemakers LHEVandertop WPBecking AG: Autologous bone is inferior to alloplastic cranioplasties: safety of autograft and allograft materials for cranioplasties, a systematic review. World Neurosurg 117:443452452.e1–452.e8 2018

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 79 79 79
Full Text Views 8 8 8
PDF Downloads 13 13 13
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar