Limitations of multidetector computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) following trauma carry risk for morbidity and mortality. Since patients with BCVI are often asymptomatic at presentation and neurological sequelae often occur within 72 hours, timely diagnosis is essential. Multidetector CT angiography (CTA) has been shown to be a noninvasive, cost-effective, reliable means of screening; however, the false-positive rate of CTA in diagnosing patients with BCVI represents a key drawback. Therefore, the authors assessed the role of DSA in the screening of BCVI when utilizing CTA as the initial screening modality.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients who experienced BCVI between 2013 and 2015 at 2 Level I trauma centers. All patients underwent CTA screening for BCVI according to the updated Denver Screening Criteria. Patients who were diagnosed with BCVI on CTA underwent confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Patient demographics, screening indication, BCVI grade on CTA and DSA, and laboratory values were collected. Comparison of false-positive rates stratified by BCVI grade on CTA was performed using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients (64% males, mean age 50 years) with 156 cerebrovascular blunt injuries to the carotid and/or vertebral arteries were identified. After comparison with DSA findings, CTA findings were incorrect in 61.5% of vessels studied, and the overall CTA false-positive rates were 47.4% of vessels studied and 47.9% of patients screened. The positive predictive value (PPV) for CTA was higher among worse BCVI subtypes on initial imaging (PPV 76% and 97%, for BCVI Grades II and IV, respectively) compared with Grade I injuries (PPV 30%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current series, multidetector CTA as a screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury had a high-false positive rate, especially in patients with Grade I BCVI. Given a false-positive rate of 47.9% with an estimated average of 132 patients per year screening positive for BCVI with CTA, approximately 63 patients per year would potentially be treated unnecessarily with antithrombotic therapy at a busy United States Level I trauma center. The authors’ data support the use of DSA after positive findings on CTA in patients with suspected BCVI. DSA as an adjunctive test in patients with positive CTA findings allows for increased diagnostic accuracy in correctly diagnosing BCVI while minimizing risk from unnecessary antithrombotic therapy in polytrauma patients.

ABBREVIATIONS BCVI = blunt cerebrovascular injury; CA = carotid artery; CCA = common CA; CTA = CT angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; ICA = internal CA; PPV = positive predictive value; VA = vertebral artery.

Article Information

Correspondence Brian T. Jankowitz, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 1350 Locust St., Ste. 300, MPOB, Pittsburgh, PA 15219. email: jankbt@upmc.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online August 11, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.JNS163264.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Chart of study population comparing BCVI grade based on screening CTA versus BCVI grade on confirmatory DSA. Figure is available in color online only.

References

1

Biffl WLCothren CCMoore EEKozar RCocanour CDavis JW: Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: screening for and treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma 67:115011532009

2

Biffl WLMoore EEOffner PJBrega KEFranciose RJBurch JM: Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale. J Trauma 47:8458531999

3

Biffl WLMoore EERyu RKOffner PJNovak ZColdwell DM: The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome. Ann Surg 228:4624701998

4

Biffl WLRay CE JrMoore EEFranciose RJAly SHeyrosa MG: Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography. Ann Surg 235:6997072002

5

Bromberg WJCollier BCDiebel LNDwyer KMHolevar MRJacobs DG: Blunt cerebrovascular injury practice management guidelines: the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 68:4714772010

6

Burlen CCBiffl WLMoore EEBarnett CCJohnson JLBensard DD: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: redefining screening criteria in the era of non-invasive diagnosis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:3303372012

7

Byrnes MCIrwin ERoach RJames MHorst PKReicks P: Therapeutic anticoagulation can be safely accomplished in selected patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. World J Emerg Surg 7:252012

8

Callcut RAHanseman DJSolan PDKadon KSIngalls NKFortuna GR: Early treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury with concomitant hemorrhagic neurologic injury is safe and effective. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:3383462012

9

Cothren CCBiffl WLMoore EEKashuk JLJohnson JL: Treatment for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: equivalence of anticoagulation and antiplatelet agents. Arch Surg 144:6856902009

10

Cothren CCMoore EE: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 60:4894962005

11

Davis JWHolbrook TLHoyt DBMackersie RCField TO JrShackford SR: Blunt carotid artery dissection: incidence, associated injuries, screening, and treatment. J Trauma 30:151415171990

12

DiCocco JMEmmett KPFabian TCZarzaur BLWilliams JSCroce MA: Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 32-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices still don’t cut it. Ann Surg 253:4444502011

13

Eachempati SRVaslef SNSebastian MWReed RL II: Blunt vascular injuries of the head and neck: is heparinization necessary? J Trauma 45:99710041998

14

Eastham S: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries in trauma. Int J Surg 33(Pt B):2512532016

15

Emmett KPFabian TCDiCocco JMZarzaur BLCroce MA: Improving the screening criteria for blunt cerebrovascular injury: the appropriate role for computed tomography angiography. J Trauma 70:105810652011

16

Goodwin RBBeery PR IIDorbish RJBetz JAHari JKOpalek JM: Computed tomographic angiography versus conventional angiography for the diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injury in trauma patients. J Trauma 67:104610502009

17

Hughes KMCollier BGreene KAKurek S: Traumatic carotid artery dissection: a significant incidental finding. Am Surg 66:102310272000

18

Kerwin AJBynoe RPMurray JHudson ERClose TPGifford RR: Liberalized screening for blunt carotid and vertebral artery injuries is justified. J Trauma 51:3083142001

19

Miller PRFabian TCBee TKTimmons SChamsuddin AFinkle R: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: diagnosis and treatment. J Trauma 51:2792862001

20

Miller PRFabian TCCroce MACagiannos CWilliams JSVang M: Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes. Ann Surg 236:3863952002

21

Paulus EMFabian TCSavage SAZarzaur BLBotta VDutton W: Blunt cerebrovascular injury screening with 64-channel multidetector computed tomography: more slices finally cut it. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76:2792852014

22

Shahan CPMagnotti LJStickley SMWeinberg JAHendrick LEUhlmann RA: A safe and effective management strategy for blunt cerebrovascular injury: Avoiding unnecessary anticoagulation and eliminating stroke. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80:9159222016

23

Sliker CWShanmuganathan KMirvis SE: Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:7907992008

24

Stein DMBoswell SSliker CWLui FYScalea TM: Blunt cerebrovascular injuries: does treatment always matter? J Trauma 66:1321442009

25

Wahl WLBrandt MMThompson BGTaheri PAGreenfield LJ: Antiplatelet therapy: an alternative to heparin for blunt carotid injury. J Trauma 52:8969012002

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 99 99 42
Full Text Views 251 251 16
PDF Downloads 171 171 14
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar