Learning brain aneurysm microsurgical skills in a human placenta model: predictive validity

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Surgery for brain aneurysms is technically demanding. In recent years, the process to learn the technical skills necessary for these challenging procedures has been affected by a decrease in the number of surgical cases available and progressive restrictions on resident training hours. To overcome these limitations, surgical simulators such as cadaver heads and human placenta models have been developed. However, the effectiveness of these models in improving technical skills is unknown. This study assessed concurrent and predictive validity of brain aneurysm surgery simulation in a human placenta model compared with a “live” human brain cadaveric model.

METHODS

Two human cadaver heads and 30 human placentas were used. Twelve neurosurgeons participated in the concurrent validity part of this study, each operating on 1 human cadaver head aneurysm model and 1 human placenta model. Simulators were evaluated regarding their ability to simulate different surgical steps encountered during real surgery. The time to complete the entire aneurysm task in each simulator was analyzed. The predictive validity component of the study involved 9 neurosurgical residents divided into 3 groups to perform simulation exercises, each lasting 6 weeks. The training for the 3 groups consisted of educational video only (3 residents), human cadaver only (3 residents), and human placenta only (3 residents). All residents had equivalent microsurgical experience with superficial brain tumor surgery. After completing their practice training, residents in each of the 3 simulation groups performed surgery for an unruptured middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm, and their performance was assessed by an experienced vascular neurosurgeon who watched the operative videos.

RESULTS

All human cadaver heads and human placentas were suitable to simulate brain aneurysm surgery. In the concurrent validity portion of the experiment, the placenta model required a longer time (p < 0.001) than cadavers to complete the task. The placenta model was considered more effective than the cadaver model in simulating sylvian fissure splitting, bipolar coagulation of oozing microvessels, and aneurysm neck and dome dissection. Both models were equally effective in simulating neck aneurysm clipping, while the cadaver model was considered superior for simulation of intraoperative rupture and for reproduction of real anatomy during simulation. In the predictive validity portion of the experiment, residents were evaluated for 4 tasks: sylvian fissure dissection, microvessel bipolar coagulation, aneurysm dissection, and aneurysm clipping. Residents trained in the human placenta simulator consistently had the highest overall performance scores when compared with those who had trained in the cadaver model and those who had simply watched operative videos (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The human placenta biological simulator provides excellent simulation for some critical tasks of aneurysm surgery such as splitting of the sylvian fissure, dissection of the aneurysm neck and dome, and bipolar coagulation of surrounding microvessels. When performing surgery for an unruptured MCA aneurysm, residents who had trained in the human placenta model performed better than residents trained with other simulation scenarios/models. In this age of reduced exposure to aneurysm surgery and restrictions on resident working hours, the placenta model is a valid simulation for microneurosurgery with striking similarities with real surgery.

ABBREVIATIONS MCA = middle cerebral artery; UFMG = Federal University of Minas Gerais.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Marcelo Magaldi Ribeiro de Oliveira, Rua Montes Claros 1442–101, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais 30310370, Brazil. email: mmagaldi@hotmail.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 24, 2017; DOI: 10.3171/2016.10.JNS162083.Disclosures Dr. Lanzino has served as a consultant to Covidien/Medtronic.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
References
  • 1

    Aboud EAboud GAl-Mefty OAboud TRammos SAbolfotoh M: “Live cadavers” for training in the management of intraoperative aneurysmal rupture. J Neurosurg 123:133913462015

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Aboud EAl-Mefty OYaşargil MG: New laboratory model for neurosurgical training that simulates live surgery. J Neurosurg 97:136713722002

  • 3

    Alaraj ALuciano CJBailey DPElsenousi ARoitberg BZBernardo A: Virtual reality cerebral aneurysm clipping simulation with real-time haptic feedback. Neurosurgery 11:2 Suppl 252582015

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Alotaibi FEAlZhrani GAMullah MASabbagh AJAzarnoush HWinkler-Schwartz A: Assessing bimanual performance in brain tumor resection with NeuroTouch, a virtual reality simulator. Neurosurgery 11:Suppl 289982015

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Ayoubi SWard PNaik SSankaran M: The use of placenta in a microvascular exercise. Neurosurgery 30:2522541992

  • 6

    Bath JLawrence P: Why we need open simulation to train surgeons in an era of work-hour restrictions. Vascular 19:1751772011

  • 7

    Chueh JYWakhloo AKGounis MJ: Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:115911642009

  • 8

    Colpan MESlavin KVAmin-Hanjani SCalderon-Arnuphi MCharbel FT: Microvascular anastomosis training model based on a turkey neck with perfused arteries.. Neurosurgery 62:5 Suppl 2ONS407ONS4112008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Delorme SLaroche DDiRaddo RDel Maestro RF: Neuro-Touch: a physics-based virtual simulator for cranial microneurosurgery training. Neurosurgery 71:1 Suppl Operative32422012

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gasco JHolbrook TJPatel ASmith APaulson DMuns A: Neurosurgery simulation in residency training: feasibility, cost, and educational benefit.. Neurosurgery 73:Suppl 1S39SS452013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hino A: Training in microvascular surgery using a chicken wing artery. Neurosurgery 52:149514982003

  • 12

    Kwok JCHuang WLeung WCChan SKChan KYLeung KM: Human placenta as an ex vivo vascular model for neurointerventional research. J Neurointerv Surg 6:3943992014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Malone HRSyed ONDownes MSD'Ambrosio ALQuest DOKaiser MG: Simulation in neurosurgery: a review of computer-based simulation environments and their surgical applications. Neurosurgery 67:110511162010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Mücke THölzle FWolff KDHarders AScholz M: Microsurgically induced pure arterial aneurysm model in rats. Cent Eur Neurosurg 72:38412011

  • 15

    Olabe JOlabe JRoda J: Microsurgical cerebral aneurysm training porcine model. Neurol India 59:78812011

  • 16

    Oliveira MMAraujo ABNicolato AProsdocimi AGodinho JVValle AL: Face, content, and construct validity of brain tumor microsurgery simulation using a human placenta model. Oper Neurosurg 12:61672016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Oliveira Magaldi MNicolato AGodinho JVSantos MProsdocimi AMalheiros JA: Human placenta aneurysm model for training neurosurgeons in vascular microsurgery. Neurosurgery 10:Suppl 45926012014

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Partridge RWBrown FSBrennan PMHennessey IAHughes MA: The LEAPTM gesture interface device and take-home laparoscopic simulators: a study of construct and concurrent validity. Surg Innov 23:70772016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Raymond JSalazkin IGevry GNguyen TN: Interventional neuroradiology: the role of experimental models in scientific progress. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:4014052007

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Rhoton AL Jr: Aneurysms.. Neurosurg 51:4 SupplS1-121S1-1582002

  • 21

    Ribeiro de Oliveira MMNicolato ASantos MGodinho JVBrito RAlvarenga A: Face, content, and construct validity of human placenta as a haptic training tool in neurointerventional surgery. J Neurosurg 124:123812442016

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Schlattmann PDirnagl U: Statistics in experimental cerebrovascular research: comparison of more than two groups with a continuous outcome variable. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 30:155815632010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Scholz MMücke TDüring MvPechlivanis ISchmieder KHarders AG: Microsurgically induced aneurysm models in rats, part I: techniques and histological examination. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 51:76822008

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Sorenson TBrinjikji WLanzino G: Newer endovascular tools: a review of experimental and clinical aspects. J Neurosurg Sci 60:1161252016

  • 25

    Sorenson TLanzino G: Trials and tribulations: an evidence-based approach to aneurysm treatment. J Neurosurg Sci 60:22262016

TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 527 523 68
Full Text Views 343 196 6
PDF Downloads 234 151 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar