Some studies have demonstrated that intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring reduces the mortality of traumatic brain injury (TBI). But other studies have shown that ICP monitoring is associated with increased mortality. Thus, the authors performed a meta-analysis of studies comparing ICP monitoring with no ICP monitoring in patients who have suffered a TBI to determine if differences exist between these strategies with respect to mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS.
The authors systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central) from their inception to October 2013 for relevant studies. Randomized clinical trials and prospective cohort, retrospective observational cohort, and case-control studies that compared ICP monitoring with no ICP monitoring for the treatment of TBI were included in the analysis. Studies included had to report at least one point of mortality in an ICP monitoring group and a no–ICP monitoring group. Data were extracted for study characteristics, patient demographics, baseline characteristics, treatment details, and study outcomes.
A total of 14 studies including 24,792 patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis provides no evidence that ICP monitoring decreased the risk of death (pooled OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.77–1.11], p = 0.40). However, 7 of the studies including 12,944 patients were published after 2012 (January 2012 to October 2013), and they revealed that ICP monitoring was significantly associated with a greater decrease in mortality than no ICP monitoring (pooled OR 0.56 [95% CI 0.41–0.78], p = 0.0006). In addition, 7 of the studies conducted in North America showed no evidence that ICP monitoring decreased the risk of death, similar to the studies conducted in other regions. ICU LOSs were significantly longer for the group subjected to ICP monitoring (mean difference [MD] 0.29 [95% CI 0.21–0.37]; p < 0.00001). In the pooled data, the hospital LOS with ICP monitoring was also significantly longer than with no ICP monitoring (MD 0.21 [95% CI 0.04–0.37]; p = 0.01).
In this systematic review and meta-analysis of ICP monitoring studies, the authors found that the current clinical evidence does not indicate that ICP monitoring overall is significantly superior to no ICP monitoring in terms of the mortality of TBI patients. However, studies published after 2012 indicated a lower mortality in patients who underwent ICP monitoring.
ABBREVIATIONSBTF = Brain Trauma Foundation; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; ICP = intracranial pressure; ICU = intensive care unit; MD = mean difference; STROBE = Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology; TBI = traumatic brain injury.
Drs. Qiang Yuan, Xing Wu, and Yirui Sun contributed equally to this work.
Correspondence Jin Hu, Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, 12 Wulumuqi Zhong Rd., Shanghai 200040, China. email: email@example.com.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online December 5, 2014; DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS1460.
DISCLOSURE The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC Grants 30371454, 81271375, and 81171133), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Project (10JC1402300), and Shanghai Nature Science Foundation (08411952000).
AlaliASFowlerRAMainprizeTGScalesDCKissAde MestralC: Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe traumatic brain injury: results from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. J Neurotrauma30:1737–17462013
BierstekerHAAndriessenTMHornJFranschmanGvan der NaaltJHoedemaekersCW: Factors influencing intracranial pressure monitoring guideline compliance and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med40:1914–19222012
BrattonSLChestnutRMGhajarJMcConnell HammondFFHarrisOAHartlR: Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma24:Suppl 1S55–S582007. (Erratum in J Neurotrauma 25: 276–278 2008)
GirardTDKressJPFuchsBDThomasonJWSchweickertWDPunBT: Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet371:126–1342008
JuulNMorrisGFMarshallSBThe Executive Committee of the International Selfotel TrialMarshallLF: Intracranial hypertension and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence on neurological deterioration and outcome in severe head injury. J Neurosurg92:1–62000
MauritzWSteltzerHBauerPDolanski-AghamanoukjanLMetnitzP: Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: an Austrian prospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med34:1208–12152008
TalvingPKaramanosETeixeiraPGSkiadaDLamLBelzbergH: Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe head injury: compliance with Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines and effect on outcomes: a prospective study. J Neurosurg119:1248–12542013
von ElmEAltmanDGEggerMPocockSJGøtzschePCVandenbrouckeJP: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet370:1453–14572007