Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot wounds to the head upon presentation

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Prediction of outcome from initial presentation after a gunshot wound to the head (GSWH) is essential to further clinical decision making. The authors' goals are to report the survival and functional outcomes of these patients, to identify prognostic factors, and to propose a scoring system that can predict their outcome.

Methods

The records of 199 patients admitted with a GSWH with dural penetration between 1990 and 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criterion was a CT scan available for review. Patients declared brain dead on presentation were excluded, which yielded a series of 119 patients. Statistical analysis was performed using a logistic regression model.

Results

Fifty-eight (49%) of the 119 patients died. Twenty-three patients (19%) had a favorable outcome defined as a 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score of moderate disability or good recovery, 35 (29%) had a poor outcome (GOS of persistent vegetative state or severe disability), and 3 (3%) were lost to follow-up. Significant prognostic factors for mortality were age older than 35 years, nonreactive pupils, bullet trajectory of bihemispheric (excluding bifrontal), and posterior fossa involvement compared with unihemispheric and bifrontal. Factors that were moderately associated with higher mortality included intracranial pressure (ICP) above 20 mm Hg and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at presentation of 3 or 4. Upon multivariate analysis, the significant factors for mortality were bullet trajectory and pupillary response. Variables found to be significant for good functional outcome were admission GCS score greater than or equal to 5, pupillary reactivity, and bullet trajectory of unihemispheric or bifrontal. Factors moderately associated with good outcome included age of 35 years or younger, initial ICP 20 mm Hg or lower, and lack of transventricular trajectory. In the multivariate analysis, significant factors for good functional outcome were bullet trajectory and pupillary response, with age moderately associated with improved functional outcomes. The authors also propose a scoring system to estimate survival and functional outcome.

Conclusions

Age, pupils, GCS score, and bullet trajectory on CT scan can be used to determine likelihood of survival and good functional outcome. The authors advocate assessing patients based on these parameters rather than pronouncing a poor prognosis and withholding aggressive resuscitation based upon low GCS score alone.

Abbreviations used in this paper:AIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale; GSWH = gunshot wound to the head; ICP = intracranial pressure.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Shankar P. Gopinath, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, 6501 Fannin St. NC-100, Houston, TX 77030. email: shankarg@bcm.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online July 4, 2014; DOI: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Benzel ECDay WTKesterson LWillis BKKessler CWModling D: Civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. Neurosurgery 29:67721991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cavaliere RCavenago LSiccardi DViale GL: Gunshot wounds of the brain in civilians. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 94:1331361988

  • 3

    Chamoun RBRobertson CSGopinath SP: Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:6836872009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Clark WCMuhlbauer MSWatridge CBRay MW: Analysis of 76 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. J Neurosurg 65:9141986

  • 5

    Gopinath SPRobertson CSContant CFHayes CFeldman ZNarayan RK: Jugular venous desaturation and outcome after head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 57:7177231994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Grahm TWWilliams FC JrHarrington TSpetzler RF: Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 27:6967001990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Jacobs DGBrandt CPPiotrowski JJMcHenry CR: Transcranial gunshot wounds: cost and consequences. Am Surg 61:6476541995

  • 8

    Kaufman HH: Civilian gunshot wounds to the head. Neurosurgery 32:9629641993

  • 9

    Kaufman HHMakela MELee KFHaid RW JrGildenberg PL: Gunshot wounds to the head: a perspective. Neurosurgery 18:6896951986

  • 10

    Khan MBKumar RIrfan FBIrfan ABBari ME: Civilian craniocerebral gunshot injuries in a developing country: presentation, injury characteristics, prognostic indicators, and complications. World Neurosurg [in press]2013

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Kim TWLee JKMoon KSKwak HJJoo SPKim JH: Penetrating gunshot injuries to the brain. J Trauma 62:144614512007

  • 12

    Levy ML: Outcome prediction following penetrating craniocerebral injury in a civilian population: aggressive surgical management in patients with admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 6 to 15. Neurosurg Focus 8:1E22000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Levy MLMasri LSLavine SApuzzo ML: Outcome prediction after penetrating craniocerebral injury in a civilian population: aggressive surgical management in patients with admission Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 3, 4, or 5. Neurosurgery 35:77851994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Martins RSSiqueira MGSantos MTZanon-Collange NMoraes OJ: Prognostic factors and treatment of penetrating gunshot wounds to the head. Surg Neurol 60:981042003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Murano TMohr AMLavery RFLynch CHomnick ATLivingston DH: Civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: an update in predicting outcomes. Am Surg 71:100910142005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Nagib MGRockswold GLSherman RSLagaard MW: Civilian gunshot wounds to the brain: prognosis and management. Neurosurgery 18:5335371986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Nathoo NChite SHEdwards PJvan Dellen JR: Civilian infratentorial gunshot injuries: outcome analysis of 26 patients. Surg Neurol 58:2252332002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Ozkan UKemaloğlu SOzateş MAydin MD: Analysis of 107 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. Neurosurg Rev 25:2312362002

  • 19

    Part 2: Prognosis in penetrating brain injury. J Trauma 51:2 SupplS44S862001

  • 20

    Robertson CSGopinath SPGoodman JCContant CFValadka ABNarayan RK: SjvO2 monitoring in head-injured patients. J Neurotrauma 12:8918961995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Shoung HMSichez JPPertuiset B: The early prognosis of craniocerebral gunshot wounds in civilian practice as an aid to the choice of treatment. A series of 56 cases studied by the computerized tomography. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 74:27301985

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Siccardi DCavaliere RPau ALubinu FTurtas SViale GL: Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: a retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol 35:4554601991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Stone JLLichtor TFitzgerald LF: Gunshot wounds to the head in civilian practice. Neurosurgery 37:110411121995

  • 24

    Turina DSustić ATićac ZDirlić AKrstulović BGlavas A: War head injury score: an outcome prediction model in War casualties with acute penetrating head injury. Mil Med 166:3313342001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Cited By
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 118 118 62
Full Text Views 1295 606 21
PDF Downloads 468 185 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar