Using intraoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI to identify residual tumor in glioblastoma surgery

Technical note

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurosurgery,
  • 2 Radiology, and
  • 3 Pathology, Acibadem University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The goal of surgery in high-grade gliomas is to maximize the resection of contrast-enhancing tumor without causing additional neurological deficits. Intraoperative MRI improves surgical results. However, when using contrast material intraoperatively, it may be difficult to differentiate between surgically induced enhancement and residual tumor. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of intraoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI to guide this differential diagnosis and test it against tissue histopathology.

Methods

Preoperative and intraoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI was performed in 21 patients with histopathologically confirmed WHO Grade IV gliomas using intraoperative 3-T MRI. Standardized regions of interest (ROIs) were placed manually at 2 separate contrast-enhancing areas at the resection border for each patient. Time-intensity curves (TICs) were generated for each ROI. All ROIs were biopsied and the TIC types were compared with histopathological results. Pharmacokinetic modeling was performed in the last 10 patients to confirm nonparametric TIC analysis findings.

Results

Of the 42 manually selected ROIs in 21 patients, 25 (59.5%) contained solid tumor tissue and 17 (40.5%) retained the brain parenchymal architecture but contained infiltrating tumor cells. Time-intensity curves generated from residual contrast-enhancing tumor and their preoperative counterparts were comparable and showed a quick and persistently increasing slope (“climbing type”). All 17 TICs obtained from regions that did not contain solid tumor tissue were undulating and low in amplitude, compared with those obtained from residual tumors (“low-amplitude type”). Pharmacokinetic findings using the transfer constant, extravascular extracellular volume fraction, rate constant, and initial area under the curve parameters were significantly different for the tumor mass, nontumoral regions, and surgically induced contrast-enhancing areas.

Conclusions

Intraoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI provides quick, reproducible, high-quality, and simply interpreted dynamic MR images in the intraoperative setting and can aid in differentiating surgically induced enhancement from residual tumor.

Abbreviations used in this paper:HGG = high-grade glioma; iAUC = initial area under the curve; Kep = rate constant; Ktrans = transfer constant; ROI = region of interest; TIC = time-intensity curve; TSE = turbo spin echo; TWIST = Time-resolved angiography WIth Stochastic Trajectories; Ve = extravascular, extracellular volume fraction.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Koray Özduman, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Inonu cad., Okur sok. No. 20, Kozyatagi, Istanbul, 34742 Turkey. email: koray.ozduman@superonline.com.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online October 18, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.9.JNS121924.

  • 1

    Albert FK, , Forsting M, , Sartor K, , Adams HP, & Kunze S: Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma: objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis. Neurosurgery 34:4561, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Ammirati M, , Vick N, , Liao YL, , Ciric I, & Mikhael M: Effect of the extent of surgical resection on survival and quality of life in patients with supratentorial glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas. Neurosurgery 21:201206, 1987

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Awasthi R, , Rathore RK, , Soni P, , Sahoo P, , Awasthi A, & Husain N, : Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers. Neuroradiology 54:205213, 2012

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Claus EB, , Horlacher A, , Hsu L, , Schwartz RB, , Dello-Iacono D, & Talos F, : Survival rates in patients with low-grade glioma after intraoperative magnetic resonance image guidance. Cancer 103:12271233, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Collins DJ, & Padhani AR: Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of tumor perfusion. Approaches and biomedical challenges. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 23:6583, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Dietrich J, , Schneider JP, , Schulz T, , Seifert V, , Trantakis C, & Kellermann S: [Appearance of the resection area of brain tumors in intraoperative MRI imaging.]. Radiologe 38:935942, 1998. (Ger)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Ekinci G, , Akpinar IN, , Baltacioğlu F, , Erzen C, , Kiliç T, & Elmaci I, : Early-postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in glial tumors: prediction of tumor regrowth and recurrence. Eur J Radiol 45:99107, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Ferl GZ, , Xu L, , Friesenhahn M, , Bernstein LJ, , Barboriak DP, & Port RE: An automated method for nonparametric kinetic analysis of clinical DCE-MRI data: application to glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Magn Reson Med 63:13661375, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Gao R, , Isoda H, , Tanaka T, , Inagawa S, , Takeda H, & Takehara Y, : Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging of pituitary adenomas: usefulness of sequential sagittal and coronal plane images. Eur J Radiol 39:139146, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gilles R, , Guinebretière JM, , Lucidarme O, , Cluzel P, , Janaud G, & Finet JF, : Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 191:625631, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Hatiboglu MA, , Weinberg JS, , Suki D, , Rao G, , Prabhu SS, & Shah K, : Impact of intraoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging guidance on glioma surgery: a prospective volumetric analysis. Neurosurgery 64:10731081, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hirschberg H, , Samset E, , Hol PK, , Tillung T, & Lote K: Impact of intraoperative MRI on the surgical results for high-grade gliomas. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 48:7784, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hunt MA, , Bagó AG, & Neuwelt EA: Single-dose contrast agent for intraoperative MR imaging of intrinsic brain tumors by using ferumoxtran-10. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:10841088, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Knauth M, , Aras N, , Wirtz CR, , Dörfler A, , Engelhorn T, & Sartor K: Surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement: potential source of diagnostic error in intraoperative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:15471553, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Knauth M, , Egelhof T, , Roth SU, , Wirtz CR, & Sartor K: Monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles: possible solution to the problem of surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement in intraoperative MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:99102, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kubben PL, , ter Meulen KJ, , Schijns OE, , ter Laak-Poort MP, , van Overbeeke JJ, & van Santbrink H: Intraoperative MRI-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 12:10621070, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Kuhnt D, , Becker A, , Ganslandt O, , Bauer M, , Buchfelder M, & Nimsky C: Correlation of the extent of tumor volume resection and patient survival in surgery of glioblastoma multiforme with high-field intraoperative MRI guidance. Neuro Oncol 13:13391348, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Lacroix M, , Abi-Said D, , Fourney DR, , Gokaslan ZL, , Shi W, & DeMonte F, : A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg 95:190198, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Li X, , Rooney WD, , Várallyay CG, , Gahramanov S, , Muldoon LL, & Goodman JA, : Dynamic-contrast-enhanced-MRI with extravasating contrast reagent: rat cerebral glioma blood volume determination. J Magn Reson 206:190199, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Mirowitz SA, , Lee JK, , Gutierrez E, , Brown JJ, , Heiken JP, & Eilenberg SS: Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced rapid acquisition spin-echo MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 179:371376, 1991

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Nimsky C, , Ganslandt O, , Buchfelder M, & Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative visualization for resection of gliomas: the role of functional neuronavigation and intraoperative 1.5 T MRI. Neurol Res 28:482487, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Nimsky C, , Ganslandt O, , von Keller B, & Fahlbusch R: Preliminary experience in glioma surgery with intraoperative high-field MRI. Acta Neurochir Suppl 88:2129, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Nimsky C, , Ganslandt O, , Von Keller B, , Romstöck J, & Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients. Radiology 233:6778, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Nishiura M, , Yasuhiro T, & Murase K: Evaluation of time-intensity curves in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mastopathy obtained using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 29:99105, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Oh DS, & Black PM: A low-field intraoperative MRI system for glioma surgery: is it worthwhile?. Neurosurg Clin N Am 16:135141, 2005

  • 26

    Pamir MN, & Ozduman K: 3-T ultrahigh-field intraoperative MRI for low-grade glioma resection. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:15371539, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Pamir MN, , Ozduman K, , Dinçer A, , Yildiz E, , Peker S, & Ozek MM: First intraoperative, shared-resource, ultrahigh-field 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system and its application in low-grade glioma resection. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 112:5769, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Paulson ES, & Schmainda KM: Comparison of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR methods: recommendations for measuring relative cerebral blood volume in brain tumors. Radiology 249:601613, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Port RE, , Bernstein LJ, , Barboriak DP, , Xu L, , Roberts TP, & van Bruggen N: Noncompartmental kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data from malignant tumors: application to glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab. Magn Reson Med 64:408417, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Saini S, , Stark DD, , Brady TJ, , Wittenberg J, & Ferrucci JTJ Jr: Dynamic spin-echo MRI of liver cancer using Gadolinium-DTPA: animal investigation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 147:357362, 1986

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Schneider JP, , Schulz T, , Schmidt F, , Dietrich J, , Lieberenz S, & Trantakis C, : Gross-total surgery of supratentorial low-grade gliomas under intraoperative MR guidance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:8998, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Schneider JP, , Trantakis C, , Rubach M, , Schulz T, , Dietrich J, & Winkler D, : Intraoperative MRI to guide the resection of primary supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme—a quantitative radiological analysis. Neuroradiology 47:489500, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33

    Senft C, , Bink A, , Franz K, , Vatter H, , Gasser T, & Seifert V: Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 12:9971003, 2011

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Senft C, , Franz K, , Ulrich CT, , Bink A, , Szelényi A, & Gasser T, : Low field intraoperative MRI-guided surgery of gliomas: a single center experience. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 112:237243, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35

    Senft C, , Seifert V, , Hermann E, , Franz K, & Gasser T: Usefulness of intraoperative ultra low-field magnetic resonance imaging in glioma surgery. Neurosurgery 63:4 Suppl 2 257267, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Stummer W, , Pichlmeier U, , Meinel T, , Wiestler OD, , Zanella F, & Reulen HJ: Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 7:392401, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    Tofts PS: Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:91101, 1997

  • 38

    Tofts PS, , Brix G, , Buckley DL, , Evelhoch JL, , Henderson E, & Knopp MV, : Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223232, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 39

    Ulmer S, , Hartwigsen G, , Riedel C, , Jansen O, , Mehdorn HM, & Nabavi A: Intraoperative dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (iDSC-MRI) is as reliable as preoperatively acquired perfusion mapping. Neuroimage 49:21582162, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 40

    Ulmer S, , Helle M, , Jansen O, , Mehdorn HM, & Nabavi A: Intraoperative dynamic susceptibility contrast weighted magnetic resonance imaging (iDSC-MRI)—technical considerations and feasibility. Neuroimage 45:3843, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41

    Wirtz CR, , Knauth M, , Staubert A, , Bonsanto MM, , Sartor K, & Kunze S, : Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 46:11121122, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42

    Zelhof B, , Lowry M, , Rodrigues G, , Kraus S, & Turnbull L: Description of magnetic resonance imaging-derived enhancement variables in pathologically confirmed prostate cancer and normal peripheral zone regions. BJU Int 104:621627, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 259 163 13
Full Text Views 437 11 2
PDF Downloads 249 6 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0