Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) is a safe and effective treatment for patients with small to moderately sized vestibular schwannomas (VSs). Reports of stereotactic radiosurgery for large VSs have demonstrated worse tumor control and preservation of neurological function. The authors endeavored to assess the effect of size of VSs treated using GKS.
This study was a retrospective comparison of 24 patients with large VSs (> 3 cm in maximum diameter) treated with GKS compared with 49 small VSs (≤ 3 cm) matched for age, sex, radiosurgical margin and maximal doses, length of follow-up, and indication.
Actuarial tumor progression-free survival (PFS) for the large VS cohort was 95.2% and 81.8% at 3 and 5 years, respectively, compared with 97% and 90% for small VSs (p = 0.009). Overall clinical outcome was better in small VSs compared with large VSs (p < 0.001). Patients with small VSs presenting with House-Brackmann Grade I (good facial function) had better neurological outcomes compared with patients with large VSs (p = 0.003). Treatment failure occurred in 6 patients with large VSs; 3 each were treated with resection or repeat GKS. Treatment failure did not occur in the small VS group. Two patients in the large VS group required ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Univariate analysis did not identify any predictors of treatment failure among the large VS cohort.
Patients with large VSs treated using GKS had shorter PFS and worse clinical outcomes compared with age-, sex-, and indication-matched patients with small VSs. Nevertheless, GKS has efficacy for some patients with large VSs and represents a reasonable treatment option for selected patients.
Abbreviations used in this paper:GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; PFS = progression-free survival; SRS = stereotactic radiosurgery; VP = ventriculoperitoneal; VS = vestibular schwannoma.
HenzelMHammKSitterHGrossMWSurberGKleinertG: Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of acoustic neurinomas according to 3-D tumor volume shrinkage and quality of life. Strahlenther Onkol185:567–5732009
KondziolkaDLunsfordLDFlickingerJC: Acoustic tumors: operation versus radiation—making sense of opposing viewpoints. Part II. Acoustic neuromas: sorting out management options. Clin Neurosurg50:313–3282003
MilliganBDPollockBEFooteRLLinkMJ: Long-term tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes following gamma knife surgery for larger-volume vestibular schwannomas. Clinical article. J Neurosurg116:598–6042012
MyrsethEMøllerPPedersenPHVassbotnFSWentzel-LarsenTLund-JohansenM: Vestibular schwannomas: clinical results and quality of life after microsurgery or gamma knife radiosurgery. Neurosurgery56:927–9352005
PollockBEDriscollCLFooteRLLinkMJGormanDABauchCD: Patient outcomes after vestibular schwannoma management: a prospective comparison of microsurgical resection and stereotactic radiosurgery. Neurosurgery59:77–852006
van de LangenbergRHanssensPEVerheulJBvan OverbeekeJJNelemansPJDohmenAJ: Management of large vestibular schwannoma. Part II. Primary Gamma Knife surgery: radiological and clinical aspects. Clinical article. J Neurosurg115:885–8932011