Diminished default mode network recruitment of the hippocampus and parahippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Functional neuroimaging has shown that the brain organizes into several independent networks of spontaneously coactivated regions during wakeful rest (resting state). Previous research has suggested that 1 such network, the default mode network (DMN), shows diminished recruitment of the hippocampus with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). This work seeks to elucidate how hippocampal recruitment into the DMN varies by hemisphere of epileptogenic focus.

Methods

The authors addressed this issue using functional MRI to assess resting-state DMN connectivity in 38 participants (23 control participants, 7 patients with TLE and left-sided epileptogenic foci, and 8 patients with TLE and right-sided foci). Independent component analysis was conducted to identify resting-state brain networks from control participants' data. The DMN was identified and deconstructed into its individual regions of interest (ROIs). The functional connectivity of these ROIs was analyzed both by hemisphere (left vs right) and by laterality to the epileptogenic focus (ipsilateral vs contralateral).

Results

This attempt to replicate previously published methods with this data set showed that patients with left-sided TLE had reduced connectivity between the posterior cingulate (PCC) and both the left (p = 0.012) and right (p < 0.002) hippocampus, while patients with right-sided TLE showed reduced connectivity between the PCC and right hippocampus (p < 0.004). After recoding ROIs by laterality, significantly diminished functional connectivity was observed between the PCC and hippocampus of both hemispheres (ipsilateral hippocampus, p < 0.001; contralateral hippocampus, p = 0.017) in patients with TLE compared with control participants. Regression analyses showed the reduced DMN recruitment of the ipsilateral hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) to be independent of clinical variables including hippocampal sclerosis, seizure frequency, and duration of illness. The graph theory metric of strength (or mean absolute correlation) showed significantly reduced connectivity of the ipsilateral hippocampus and ipsilateral PHG in patients with TLE compared with controls (hippocampus: p = 0.028; PHG: p = 0.021, after correction for false discovery rate). Finally, these hemispheric asymmetries in strength were observed in patients with TLE that corresponded to hemisphere of epileptogenic focus; 87% of patients with TLE had weaker ipsilateral hippocampus strength (compared with the contralateral hippocampus), and 80% of patients had weaker ipsilateral PHG strength.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that recoding brain regions by the laterality to their epileptogenic focus increases the power of statistical approaches for finding interhemispheric differences in brain function. Using this approach, the authors showed TLE to selectively diminish connectivity of the hippocampus and parahippocampus in the hemisphere of the epileptogenic focus. This approach may prove to be a useful method for determining the seizure onset zone with TLE, and could be broadly applied to other neurological disorders with a lateralized onset.

Abbreviations used in this paper:df = degrees of freedom; DMN = default mode network; EEG = electroencephalography; FDR = false discovery rate; fMRI = functional MRI; HPC = hippocampus; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; MTS = mesial temporal sclerosis; PCC = posterior cingulate cortex; PHG = parahippocampal gyrus; ROI = region of interest; TLE = temporal lobe epilepsy.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: G. Andrew James, Ph.D., University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Psychiatric Research Institute, 4301 W. Markham St., #554, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205-7199. email: gajames@uams.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online May 24, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS121041.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Functional MR images showing the DMN in healthy controls. Midline structures, including the medial prefrontal cortex and PCC, are observed along with bilateral hippocampal and parahippocampal regions. Independent component analysis was conducted on the healthy controls' resting-state fMRI data to generate 20 components. The component representing the DMN was thresholded to include voxels with a significant contribution to the component time course (z ≥ 1.00 and 10 voxels) and overlaid atop the MNI ICBM452 structural brain atlas provided with the AFNI software package. Images are displayed in neurological convention (left side is on the left of the axial slice).

  • View in gallery

    Default mode network ROIs. The ROIs were defined as 6 mm radius spheres centered on the center of mass for each of the 10 ROI clusters generated from the independent component analysis in Fig. 1 and described in Table 4. The ROIs were used in connectivity analysis across groups. Images are displayed in neurological convention. MPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; L PAR = left inferior parietal lobule; R PAR = right inferior parietal lobule; L HPC = left hippocampus; R HPC = right hippocampus; L PHG = left PHG; R PHG = right PHG; L SFC = left superior frontal cortex; R SFC = right superior frontal cortex.

  • View in gallery

    Graph theory depiction of DMN connectivity in healthy controls and patients with TLE. There is less connectivity of the ipsilateral hippocampus (HPCI) and contralateral hippocampus (HPCC) to the rest of network. The strength of connectivity of these regions to the PCC was significantly less in the patient group than the control group. Each subject's ROI correlation matrix was binarized into an adjacency matrix describing the presence or absence of a connection (edge) between 2 ROIs (nodes). Lines depict edges present in the adjacency matrices at different population thresholds (that is, at least 20%, 30%, and 40% of each sample). PHGI = ipsilateral PHG; PHGC = contralateral PHG; MPFC = medial prefrontal cortex; PARI = ipsilateral inferior parietal lobule; PARC = contralateral inferior parietal lobule; SFCI = ipsilateral superior frontal cortex; SFCC = contralateral superior frontal cortex.

References

1

Beck ATSteer RABrown GK: Beck Depression Inventory - II San Antonio, TXPsychological Corp1996

2

Beckmann CFDeLuca MDevlin JTSmith SM: Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:100110132005

3

Bettus GBartolomei FConfort-Gouny SGuedj EChauvel PCozzone PJ: Role of resting state functional connectivity MRI in presurgical investigation of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81:114711542010

4

Buckner RLAndrews-Hanna JRSchacter DL: The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1124:1382008

5

Buckner RLSepulcre JTalukdar TKrienen FMLiu HHedden T: Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 29:186018732009

6

Buckner RLVincent JL: Unrest at rest: default activity and spontaneous network correlations. Neuroimage 37:109110992007

7

Bullmore ESporns O: Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:1861982009

8

Cordes DHaughton VMArfanakis KCarew JDTurski PAMoritz CH: Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:132613332001

9

Cox RW: AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 29:1621731996

10

Drane DLYuspeh RLHuthwaite JSKlingler LKFoster LMMrazik M: Healthy older adult performance on a modified version of the Cognistat (NCSE): demographic issues and preliminary normative data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 25:1331442003

11

Fox MDRaichle ME: Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:7007112007

12

Fox MDSnyder AZVincent JLCorbetta MVan Essen DCRaichle ME: The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:967396782005

13

Fox MDSnyder AZVincent JLRaichle ME: Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron 56:1711842007

14

Fransson PMarrelec G: The precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex plays a pivotal role in the default mode network: evidence from a partial correlation network analysis. Neuroimage 42:117811842008

15

Frings LSchulze-Bonhage ASpreer JWagner K: Remote effects of hippocampal damage on default network connectivity in the human brain. J Neurol 256:202120292009

16

Gaillard WDBerl MMMoore ENRitzl EKRosenberger LRWeinstein SL: Atypical language in lesional and nonlesional complex partial epilepsy. Neurology 69:176117712007

17

Green PAstner K: Manual for the Oral Word Memory Test Durham, NCCogniSyst1995

18

Greicius MDFlores BHMenon VGlover GHSolvason HBKenna H: Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol Psychiatry 62:4294372007

19

Greicius MDKrasnow BReiss ALMenon V: Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:2532582003

20

Greicius MDSrivastava GReiss ALMenon V: Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer's disease from healthy aging: evidence from functional MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:463746422004

21

Hasenkamp WJames GABoshoven WDuncan E: Altered engagement of attention and default networks during target detection in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 125:1691732011

22

He AGTan LHTang YJames GAWright PEckert MA: Modulation of neural connectivity during tongue movement and reading. Hum Brain Mapp 18:2222322003

23

James GAKelley MECraddock RCHoltzheimer PEDunlop BWNemeroff CB: Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. Neuroimage 45:7787872009

24

James GALu ZLVanMeter JWSathian KHu XPButler AJ: Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis. Top Stroke Rehabil 16:2702812009

25

Jones TBBandettini PAKenworthy LCase LKMilleville SCMartin A: Sources of group differences in functional connectivity: an investigation applied to autism spectrum disorder. Neuroimage 49:4014142010

26

Joyce KELaurienti PJBurdette JHHayasaka S: A new measure of centrality for brain networks. PLoS ONE 5:e122002010

27

Liao WZhang ZPan ZMantini DDing JDuan X: Default mode network abnormalities in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: a study combining fMRI and DTI. Hum Brain Mapp 32:8838952011

28

Liu DYan CRen JYao LKiviniemi VJZang Y: Using coherence to measure regional homogeneity of resting-state FMRI signal. Front Syst Neurosci 4:242010

29

Lynall MEBassett DSKerwin RMcKenna PJKitzbichler MMuller U: Functional connectivity and brain networks in schizophrenia. J Neurosci 30:947794872010

30

Marrelec GFransson P: Assessing the influence of different ROI selection strategies on functional connectivity analyses of fMRI data acquired during steady-state conditions. PLoS ONE 6:e147882011

31

McKeown MJMakeig SBrown GGJung TPKindermann SSBell AJ: Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum Brain Mapp 6:1601881998

32

McKeown MJSejnowski TJ: Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions. Hum Brain Mapp 6:3683721998

33

Miller KJWeaver KEOjemann JG: Direct electrophysiological measurement of human default network areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:12174121772009

34

Peltier SJNoll DC: T(2)(*) dependence of low frequency functional connectivity. Neuroimage 16:9859922002

35

Raichle MEMacLeod AMSnyder AZPowers WJGusnard DAShulman GL: A default mode of brain function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6766822001

36

Rubinov MSporns O: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52:105910692010

37

Shulman GLFiez JACorbetta MBuckner RLMiezin FMRaichle ME: Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 9:6486631997

38

Thirion BDodel SPoline JB: Detection of signal synchronizations in resting-state fMRI datasets. Neuroimage 29:3213272006

39

Thivard LLehéricy SKrainik AAdam CDormont DChiras J: Diffusion tensor imaging in medial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Neuroimage 28:6826902005

40

Vincent JLSnyder AZFox MDShannon BJAndrews JRRaichle ME: Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. J Neurophysiol 96:351735312006

41

Warren CPHu SStead MBrinkmann BHBower MRWorrell GA: Synchrony in normal and focal epileptic brain: the seizure onset zone is functionally disconnected. J Neurophysiol 104:353035392010

42

Worsley KJChen JILerch JEvans AC: Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:9139202005

43

Yarkoni T: Big correlations in little studies. Perspect Psychol Sci 4:2942982009

44

Zhang ZLu GZhong YTan QLiao WWang Z: Altered spontaneous neuronal activity of the default-mode network in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res 1323:1521602010

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 142 142 58
Full Text Views 199 199 16
PDF Downloads 119 119 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar