Radiation exposure in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a quality improvement target

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The care of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has improved dramatically over the last decades. These gains are the result of improved microsurgical, endovascular, and medical management techniques. This intensive management subjects patients to multiple radiographic studies and thus increased radiation exposure. As greater understanding of the risks of radiation exposure develops, physicians must be better equipped to balance the need for optimal SAH management with the minimization of patient exposure to radiation from imaging studies. The goal in the current study was to determine if there is an opportunity for a reduction in radiation dose without a change in the quality of treatment in patients with SAH.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all patients hospitalized for SAH at the Brigham and Women's Hospital in the period from January 1, 2009, to August 31, 2010, was performed. The authors calculated cumulative and imaging study–specific radiation doses, determined the time of day that imaging studies were performed, and surveyed neurosurgeons regarding issues surrounding imaging-related radiation exposure.

Results

The data for 77 patients were analyzed. The mean cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization was 2.76 Gy per patient (range 0.46–8.32 Gy). The mean radiation exposure from each CT, CT angiography (CTA), and angiography study was 0.08, 0.29, and 0.77 Gy (ranges 0.02–0.40, 0.15–0.99, and 0.11–4.36 Gy, respectively). Subgroup analysis of the top quartile of patients in terms of total radiation dose revealed a mean cumulative radiation dose of 4.78 Gy (range 3.42–8.32 Gy), mean cumulative number of CT and CTA scans of 14, and mean CT or CTA scan per day of 0.5 (maximum 0.8). Seventeen percent of the noncontrast head CT studies were performed just prior to morning rounds, more than double the 8% expected rate at random. Thirty-four percent of the repeat noncontrast head CTs did not show any change between scans, as documented on radiology reports. When surveyed, a majority of neurosurgeons incorrectly estimated the radiation dose typically received from CT, CTA, and angiography studies, and 65% asserted that radiation exposure is “not important” or only “somewhat important” when considering whether to order an imaging study.

Conclusions

Study findings suggested that patients with SAH have significant imaging-related exposure to radiation. The authors believe it is possible to continue the current improved outcomes in SAH with a significant reduction in radiation exposure from imaging studies. This analysis highlights the significance of accurate assessment of radiation exposure as a quality improvement target.

Abbreviations used in this paper:CAK = cumulative air kerma; CTA = CT angiography; CTDIvol = volume CT dose index; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Judith M. Wong, M.D., M.P.H., Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. email: jwong17@partners.org.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online April 26, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.3.JNS12253.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing survey responses of neurosurgeons regarding the specific radiation dose delivered by individual imaging studies and the minimum dose required for skin burn risk. Gray bars indicate resident responses; black bars, attending responses; and white bars, overall responses.

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph of survey responses of neurosurgeons regarding the importance of considering radiation exposure when ordering radiographic studies. Black bars indicate attending responses; gray bars, resident responses.

References

1

AAPM Task Group 23: The Measurement Reporting and Management of Radiation Dose in CT (http://www.aapm.org/pubs/reports/rpt_96.pdf) [Accessed March 22 2013]

2

Bardach NSZhao SGress DRLawton MTJohnston SC: Association between subarachnoid hemorrhage outcomes and number of cases treated at California hospitals. Stroke 33:185118562002

3

Bederson JBConnolly ES JrBatjer HHDacey RGDion JEDiringer MN: Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 40:99410252009

4

Berman MFSolomon RAMayer SAJohnston SCYung PP: Impact of hospital-related factors on outcome after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 34:220022072003

5

Chang ELWefel JSHess KRAllen PKLang FFKornguth DG: Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 10:103710442009

6

Cross DT IIITirschwell DLClark MATuden DDerdeyn CPMoran CJ: Mortality rates after subarachnoid hemorrhage: variations according to hospital case volume in 18 states. J Neurosurg 99:8108172003

7

Crossen JRGarwood DGlatstein ENeuwelt EA: Neurobehavioral sequelae of cranial irradiation in adults: a review of radiation-induced encephalopathy. J Clin Oncol 12:6276421994

8

D'Ercole LMantovani LThyrion FZBocchiola MAzzaretti ADi Maria F: A study on maximum skin dose in cerebral embolization procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:5035072007

9

Gonzalez NRBoscardin WJGlenn TVinuela FMartin NA: Vasospasm probability index: a combination of transcranial doppler velocities, cerebral blood flow, and clinical risk factors to predict cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg 107:110111122007

10

Guglielmi GViñuela FDion JDuckwiler G: Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 75:8141991

11

Guglielmi GViñuela FSepetka IMacellari V: Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 75:171991

12

Haley EC JrKassell NFTorner JC: A randomized trial of nicardipine in subarachnoid hemorrhage: angiographic and transcranial Doppler ultrasound results. A report of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. J Neurosurg 78:5485531993

13

Hicks LSSequist TDAyanian JZShaykevich SFairchild DGOrav EJ: Impact of computerized decision support on blood pressure management and control: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 23:4294412008

14

Higashida RTHalbach VVDowd CFDormandy BBell JHieshima GB: Intravascular balloon dilatation therapy for intracranial arterial vasospasm: patient selection, technique, and clinical results. Neurosurg Rev 15:89951992

15

Huang FAlrefae MLangleben ARoberge D: Prophylactic cranial irradiation in advanced breast cancer: a case for caution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 73:7527582009

16

Institute of Medicine: Performance Measurement: Accelerating Improvement Washington, DCNational Academy of Sciences2005

17

Ketteler ERBrown KR: Radiation exposure in endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 53:1 Suppl35S38S2011

18

Le Péchoux CLaplanche AFaivre-Finn CCiuleanu TWanders RLerouge D: Clinical neurological outcome and quality of life among patients with limited small-cell cancer treated with two different doses of prophylactic cranial irradiation in the intergroup phase III trial (PCI99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212 and IFCT 99-01). Ann Oncol 22:115411632011

19

Le Roux PDElliott JPDowney LNewell DWGrady MSMayberg MR: Improved outcome after rupture of anterior circulation aneurysms: a retrospective 10-year review of 224 good-grade patients. J Neurosurg 83:3944021995

20

Le Roux PDNewell DWEskridge JMayberg MRWinn HR: Severe symptomatic vasospasm: the role of immediate postoperative angioplasty. J Neurosurg 80:2242291994

21

Loftus MLMinkowitz STsiouris AJMin RJSanelli PC: Utilization guidelines for reducing radiation exposure in the evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a practice quality improvement project. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1761802010

22

Lovelock CERinkel GJRothwell PM: Time trends in outcome of subarachnoid hemorrhage: Population-based study and systematic review. Neurology 74:149415012010

23

Mamourian ACYoung HStiefel MF: Cumulative radiation dose in patients admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study using a self-developing film badge. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:178717902010

24

Martin CJ: Radiation dosimetry for diagnostic medical exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 128:3894122008

25

Modan BBaidatz DMart HSteinitz RLevin SG: Radiation-induced head and neck tumours. Lancet 1:2772791974

26

Moskowitz SIDavros WJKelly MEFiorella DRasmussen PAMasaryk TJ: Cumulative radiation dose during hospitalization for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:137713822010

27

Porter ME: What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 363:247724812010

28

Ron EModan BBoice JD JrAlfandary EStovall MChetrit A: Tumors of the brain and nervous system after radiotherapy in childhood. N Engl J Med 319:103310391988

29

Ron EModan BPreston DAlfandary EStovall MBoice JD Jr: Radiation-induced skin carcinomas of the head and neck. Radiat Res 125:3183251991

30

Rothschild JMMcGurk SHonour MLu LMcClendon AASrivastava P: Assessment of education and computerized decision support interventions for improving transfusion practice. Transfusion 47:2282392007

31

Sadetzki SChetrit AFreedman LStovall MModan BNovikov I: Long-term follow-up for brain tumor development after childhood exposure to ionizing radiation for tinea capitis. Radiat Res 163:4244322005

32

Santillan AKnopman JZink WPatsalides AGobin YP: Transluminal balloon angioplasty for symptomatic distal vasospasm refractory to medical therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 59:951012011

33

Seidling HMPhansalkar SSeger DLPaterno MDShaykevich SHaefeli WE: Factors influencing alert acceptance: a novel approach for predicting the success of clinical decision support. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:4794842011

34

Stecker MSBalter STowbin RBMiller DLVañó EBartal G: Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:7 SupplS263S2732009

35

Umansky FShoshan YRosenthal GFraifeld SSpektor S: Radiation-induced meningioma. Neurosurg Focus 24:5E72008

36

US Food and Drug Administration: White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging (http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/ucm199994.htm) [Accessed March 22 2013]

37

Vano EGonzalez LFernández JMHaskal ZJ: Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology 248:9459532008

38

Welzel GFleckenstein KMai SKHermann BKraus-Tiefenbacher UWenz F: Acute neurocognitive impairment during cranial radiation therapy in patients with intracranial tumors. Strahlenther Onkol 184:6476542008

39

White PMGilmour JNWeir NWInnes BSellar RJ: AngioCT in the management of neurointerventional patients: a prospective, consecutive series with associated dosimetry and resolution data. Neuroradiology 50:3213302008

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 42 42 20
Full Text Views 111 111 17
PDF Downloads 122 122 29
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar