A positive correlation between outcomes and the volume of patients seen by a provider has been supported by numerous studies. Volume-outcome relationships (VORs) have been well documented in the setting of both neurosurgery and trauma care and have shaped regionalization policies to optimize patient outcomes. Several authors have also investigated the correlation between patient volume and cost of care, known as the volume-cost relationship (VCR), with mixed results. The purpose of the present study was to investigate VORs and VCRs in the treatment of common intracranial injuries by testing the hypotheses that outcomes suffer at small-volume centers and costs rise at large-volume centers.
The authors performed a cross-sectional cohort study of patients with neurological trauma using the 2006 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, the largest nationally representative all-payer data set. Patients were identified using ICD-9 codes for subdural, subarachnoid, and extradural hemorrhage following injury. Transfers were excluded from the study. In the primary analysis the association between a facility's neurotrauma patient volume and patient survival was tested. Secondary analyses focused on the relationships between patient volume and discharge status as well as between patient volume and cost. Analyses were performed using logistic regression.
In-hospital mortality in the overall cohort was 9.9%. In-hospital mortality was 14.9% in the group with the smallest volume of patients, that is, fewer than 6 cases annually. At facilities treating 6–11, 12–23, 24–59, and 60+ patients annually, mortality was 8.0%, 8.3%, 9.5%, and 10.0%, respectively. For these groups there was a significantly reduced risk of in-hospital mortality as compared with the group with fewer than 6 annual patients; the adjusted ORs (and corresponding 95% CIs) were 0.45 (0.29–0.68), 0.56 (0.38–0.81), 0.63 (0.44–0.90), and 0.59 (0.41–0.87), respectively. For these same groups (once again using < 6 cases/year as the reference), there were no statistically significant differences in either estimated actual cost or duration of hospital stay.
A VOR exists in the treatment of neurotrauma, and a meaningful threshold for significantly improved mortality is 6 cases per year. Emergency and interfacility transport policies based on this threshold might improve national outcomes. Cost of care does not differ significantly with patient volume.
Abbreviations used in this paper:AIS = Abbreviated Injury Scale; CABG = coronary artery bypass graft; ICH = intracranial hemorrhage; LOS = length of stay; NIS = Nationwide Inpatient Sample; VCR = volume-cost relationship; VOR = volume-outcome relationship.
Address correspondence to: Neil R. Malhotra, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 3 Silverstein Pavilion, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104. email: NRM@UPHS.UPenn.edu.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online December 14, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12682.
BarkerFGIIKlibanskiASwearingenB: Transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors in the United States, 1996–2000: mortality, morbidity, and the effects of hospital and surgeon volume. J Clin Endocrinol Metab88:4709–47192003
DemetriadesDMartinMSalimARheePBrownCDoucetJ: Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15). J Am Coll Surg202:212–2152006
GooikerGAvan GijnWPostPNvan de VeldeCJHTollenaarRAEMWoutersMWJM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. Are breast cancer patients better of with a high volume provider?. Eur J Surg Oncol36:Suppl 1S27–S352010
Goossens-LaanCAGooikerGAvan GijnWPostPNBoschJLHRKilPJM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between hospital/surgeon volume and outcome for radical cystectomy: an update for the ongoing debate. Eur Urol59:775–7832011
HannanELKilburnHJrBernardHO'DonnellJFLukacikGShieldsEP: Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors. Med Care29:1094–11071991
HoltPJEPolonieckiJDLoftusIMMichaelsJAThompsonMM: Epidemiological study of the relationship between volume and outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery in the UK from 2000 to 2005. Br J Surg94:441–4482007
KonetyBRDhawanVAllareddyVO'DonnellMA: Association between volume and charges for most frequently performed ambulatory and nonambulatory surgery for bladder cancer. Is more cheaper?. J Urol172:1056–10612004
SmithERButlerWEBarkerFGII: In-hospital mortality rates after ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures in the United States, 1998 to 2000: relation to hospital and surgeon volume of care. J Neurosurg100:2 Suppl Pediatrics90–972004
SolheimOSalvesenØCappelenJJohannesenTB: The impact of provider surgical volumes on survival in children with primary tumors of the central nervous system—a population-based study. Acta Neurochir (Wien)153:1219–12292011