Paradoxical trends in the management of vestibular schwannoma in the United States

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Recent natural history studies of vestibular schwannomas (VSs) suggest that most of these tumors do not grow. The impact of these new data on management trends in the US is currently unknown. The aim in the present study was to evaluate current trends in the treatment of VS in the US by analyzing a national cancer database.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program is a national database maintained by the National Cancer Institute representing 26% of the US population. Data from the database were downloaded using provided software. Cases were isolated based on histology codes and the site code. Data from 2004 to 2007 were included in the analysis. The number of patients undergoing resection was compared with the number treated with beam radiation and observation, based on tumor size.

Results

Three thousand six hundred fifty cases were identified in the database. Over the study period, management choices for VSs showed a significant change only for tumors with a diameter < 2 cm. In this tumor category, a decrease in resection and an increase in radiation were observed, with observation showing a modest increase but remaining low at an average of 25%.

Conclusions

Study data demonstrated a shift in the management of small VSs in the US between 2004 and 2007, with microsurgical removal giving way to radiation treatment and the overall rate for observation remaining low and stable. With recent literature suggesting that the majority of small tumors do not grow, the authors assert that VSs are being overtreated in the US.

Abbreviations used in this paper:SEER = Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results; VS = vestibular schwannoma.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Siviero Agazzi, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, Tampa, Florida 33606. email: sagazzi@health.usf.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 22, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.5.JNS111858.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing management trend for VSs with a diameter smaller than 2 cm. From 2004 to 2007, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of patients undergoing surgery (triangles) from 52% to 42%, while the percentage of patients undergoing radiation (squares) increased from 27% to 32% (overall p = 0.004). Diamonds indicate observation.

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing management trend for all VSs from 2004 to 2007. Note the significant decrease in the percentage of patients undergoing surgery (squares) from 61% to 51%, while the percentage of patients undergoing radiation (diamonds) increased from 23% to 28% (p = 0.004). The overall trend for treatment versus nontreatment remained nonsignificant (p = 0.129). Triangles indicate observation.

References

1

Bakkouri WEKania REGuichard JPLot GHerman PHuy PT: Conservative management of 386 cases of unilateral vestibular schwannoma: tumor growth and consequences for treatment. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 110:6626692009

2

Chopra RKondziolka DNiranjan ALunsford LDFlickinger JC: Long-term follow-up of acoustic schwannoma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:8458512007

3

Daniels RLSwallow CShelton CDavidson HCKrejci CSHarnsberger HR: Causes of unilateral sensorineural hearing loss screened by high-resolution fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging: review of 1,070 consecutive cases. Am J Otol 21:1731802000

4

Gal TJShinn JHuang B: Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 142:6776812010

5

Godefroy WPKaptein AAVogel JJvan der Mey AG: Conservative treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a follow-up study on clinical and quality-of-life outcome. Otol Neurotol 30:9689742009

6

Hajioff DRaut VVWalsh RMBath APBance MLGuha A: Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas: third review of a 10-year prospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 33:2552592008

7

Hirsch ANorén G: Audiological findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol 106:2442511988

8

Hirsch ANorén G: Audiologic findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 449:171988

9

Hirsch ANorén GAnderson H: Audiologic findings after stereotactic radiosurgery in nine cases of acoustic neurinomas. Acta Otolaryngol 88:1551601979

10

Lobato-Polo JKondziolka DZorro OKano HFlickinger JCLunsford LD: Gamma knife radiosurgery in younger patients with vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurgery 65:2943012009

11

Norén GArndt JHindmarsh T: Stereotactic radiosurgery in cases of acoustic neurinoma: further experiences. Neurosurgery 13:12221983

12

Pollock BELunsford LDNorén G: Vestibular schwannoma management in the next century: a radiosurgical perspective. Neurosurgery 43:4754831998

13

Propp JMMcCarthy BJDavis FGPreston-Martin S: Descriptive epidemiology of vestibular schwannomas. Neuro Oncol 8:1112006

14

Raut VVWalsh RMBath APBance MLGuha ATator CH: Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas - second review of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29:5055142004

15

Shin YJFraysse BCognard CGafsi ICharlet JPBerges C: Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 21:8578622000

16

Smouha EEYoo MMohr KDavis RP: Conservative management of acoustic neuroma: a meta-analysis and proposed treatment algorithm. Laryngoscope 115:4504542005

17

Stangerup SECaye-Thomasen PTos MThomsen J: The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 27:5475522006

18

Stangerup SETos MThomsen JCaye-Thomasen P: True incidence of vestibular schwannoma?. Neurosurgery 67:133513402010

19

Suzuki MHashimoto SKano SOkitsu T: Prevalence of acoustic neuroma associated with each configuration of pure tone audiogram in patients with asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 119:6156182010

20

Tos MStangerup SECayé-Thomasen PTos TThomsen J: What is the real incidence of vestibular schwannoma?. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:2162202004

21

Walsh RMBath APBance MLKeller ATator CHRutka JA: The natural history of untreated vestibular schwannomas. Is there a role for conservative management?. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 121:21262000

22

Yang ISughrue MEHan SJFang SAranda DCheung SW: Facial nerve preservation after vestibular schwannoma Gamma Knife radiosurgery. J Neurooncol 93:41482009

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 104 104 30
Full Text Views 154 154 11
PDF Downloads 94 94 8
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar