Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is the gold-standard technique for motor mapping during craniotomy. However, preoperative noninvasive motor mapping is becoming increasingly accurate. Two such noninvasive modalities are navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) imaging. While MEG imaging has already been extensively validated as an accurate modality of noninvasive motor mapping, TMS is less well studied. In this study, the authors compared the accuracy of TMS to both DCS and MEG imaging.
Patients with tumors in proximity to primary motor cortex underwent preoperative TMS and MEG imaging for motor mapping. The patients subsequently underwent motor mapping via intraoperative DCS. The loci of maximal response were recorded from each modality and compared. Motor strength was assessed at 3 months postoperatively.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and MEG imaging were performed on 24 patients. Intraoperative DCS yielded 8 positive motor sites in 5 patients. The median distance ± SEM between TMS and DCS motor sites was 2.13 ± 0.29 mm, and between TMS and MEG imaging motor sites was 4.71 ± 1.08 mm. In no patients did DCS motor mapping reveal a motor site that was unrecognized by TMS. Three of 24 patients developed new, early neurological deficit in the form of upper-extremity paresis. At the 3-month follow-up evaluation, 2 of these patients were significantly improved, experiencing difficulty only with fine motor tasks; the remaining patient had improvement to 4/5 strength. There were no deaths over the course of the study.
Maps of the motor system generated with TMS correlate well with those generated by both MEG imaging and DCS. Negative TMS mapping also correlates with negative DCS mapping. Navigated TMS is an accurate modality for noninvasively generating preoperative motor maps.
Abbreviations used in this paper:DCS = direct cortical stimulation; ERD = event-related desynchronization; MEG = magnetoencephalography; MEP = motor evoked potential; TMS = transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Address correspondence to: Sri Nagarajan, Ph.D., Department of Radiology, University of California at San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S362, San Francisco, California 94143. email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 15, 2012; DOI: 10.3171/2012.5.JNS112124.
CarrabbaGFavaEGiussaniCAcerbiFPortaluriFSongaV: Cortical and subcortical motor mapping in rolandic and perirolandic glioma surgery: impact on postoperative morbidity and extent of resection. J Neurosurg Sci51:45–512007
CroneNEMigliorettiDLGordonBLesserRP: Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. II. Event-related synchronization in the gamma band. Brain121:Pt 122301–23151998
CroneNEMigliorettiDLGordonBSierackiJMWilsonMTUematsuS: Functional mapping of human sensorimotor cortex with electrocorticographic spectral analysis. I. Alpha and beta event-related desynchronization. Brain121:Pt 122271–22991998
DuffauHCapelleLSichezJFaillotTAbdennourLLaw KouneJD: Intra-operative direct electrical stimulations of the central nervous system: the Salpêtrière experience with 60 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien)141:1157–11671999
HannulaHYliojaSPertovaaraAKorvenojaARuohonenJIlmoniemiRJ: Somatotopic blocking of sensation with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary somatosensory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp26:100–1092005
InoueTShimizuHNakasatoNKumabeTYoshimotoT: Accuracy and limitation of functional magnetic resonance imaging for identification of the central sulcus: comparison with magnetoencephalography in patients with brain tumors. Neuroimage10:738–7481999
JulkunenPSäisänenLDannerNNiskanenEHukkanenTMervaalaE: Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. Neuroimage44:790–7952009
KelesGELundinDALambornKRChangEFOjemannGBergerMS: Intraoperative subcortical stimulation mapping for hemispherical perirolandic gliomas located within or adjacent to the descending motor pathways: evaluation of morbidity and assessment of functional outcome in 294 patients. J Neurosurg100:369–3752004
McKiernanBJMarcarioJKKarrerJHCheneyPD: Corticomotoneuronal postspike effects in shoulder, elbow, wrist, digit, and intrinsic hand muscles during a reach and prehension task. J Neurophysiol80:1961–19801998
PfurtschellerGPregenzerMNeuperC: Visualization of sensorimotor areas involved in preparation for hand movement based on classification of mu and central beta rhythms in single EEG trials in man. Neurosci Lett181:43–461994
PichtTSchmidtSBrandtSFreyDHannulaHNeuvonenT: Preoperative functional mapping for rolandic brain tumor surgery: comparison of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation to direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery69:581–5882011
RomstöckJFahlbuschRGanslandtONimskyCStraussC: Localisation of the sensorimotor cortex during surgery for brain tumours: feasibility and waveform patterns of somatosensory evoked potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry72:221–2292002
RossiniPMBarkerATBerardelliACaramiaMDCarusoGCraccoRQ: Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol91:79–921994
SchiffbauerHBergerMSFerrariPFreudensteinDRowleyHARobertsTP: Preoperative magnetic source imaging for brain tumor surgery: a quantitative comparison with intraoperative sensory and motor mapping. J Neurosurg97:1333–13422002
SchiffbauerHBergerMSFerrariPFreudensteinDRowleyHARobertsTP: Preoperative magnetic source imaging for brain tumor surgery: a quantitative comparison with intraoperative sensory and motor mapping. Neurosurg Focus15:1E72003
TaniguchiMKatoANinomiyaHHirataMCheyneDRobinsonSE: Cerebral motor control in patients with gliomas around the central sulcus studied with spatially filtered magnetoencephalography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry75:466–4712004