Medical school and residency influence on choice of an academic career and academic productivity among neurosurgery faculty in the United States

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

Factors determining choice of an academic career in neurological surgery are unclear. This study seeks to evaluate the graduates of medical schools and US residency programs to determine those programs that produce a high number of graduates remaining within academic programs and the contribution of these graduates to academic neurosurgery as determined by h-index valuation.

Methods

Biographical information from current faculty members of all accredited neurosurgery training programs in the US with departmental websites was obtained. Any individual who did not have an American Board of Neurological Surgery certificate (or was not board eligible) was excluded. The variables collected included medical school attended, residency program completed, and current academic rank. For each faculty member, Web of Science and Scopus h-indices were also collected.

Results

Ninety-seven academic neurosurgery departments with 986 faculty members were analyzed. All data regarding training program and medical school education were compiled and analyzed by center from which each faculty member graduated. The 20 medical schools and neurosurgical residency training programs producing the greatest number of graduates remaining in academic practice, and the respective individuals' h-indices, are reported. Medical school graduates of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons chose to enter academics the most frequently. The neurosurgery training program at the University of Pittsburgh produced the highest number of academic neurosurgeons in this sample.

Conclusions

The use of quantitative measures to evaluate the academic productivity of medical school and residency graduates may provide objective measurements by which the subjective influence of training experiences on choice of an academic career may be inferred. The top 3 residency training programs were responsible for 10% of all academic neurosurgeons. The influence of medical school and residency experiences on choice of an academic career may be significant.

Abbreviations used in this paper: ACGME = Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education; WOS = Web of Science.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: John K. Ratliff, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, 909 Walnut Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107. email: john.ratliff@jefferson.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online April 15, 2011; DOI: 10.3171/2011.3.JNS101176.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph demonstrating the mean WOS- and Scopus-derived h-index of academic neurosurgeons in comparison with rank.

References

  • 1

    Bakkalbasi NBauer KGlover JWang L: Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr 3:72006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bar-Ilan J: Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics 74:2572712008

  • 3

    Benway BMKalidas PCabello JMBhayani SB: Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology?. Urology 74:30332009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Black PM: Challenges in contemporary academic neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 58:4194252006

  • 5

    Borges NJNavarro AMGrover AHoban JD: How, when, and why do physicians choose careers in academic medicine? A literature review. Acad Med 85:6806862010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Choi MFuller CDThomas CR Jr: Estimation of citation-based scholarly activity among radiation oncology faculty at domestic residency-training institutions: 1996–2007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1721782009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Congress of Neurological Surgeons: Bylaws of The Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Articles of incorporation on file with the District of Columbia 1988 Adopted October 28 1989. Latest revision October 19 2010. (http://www.cns.org/about/pdf/cnsbylaws.pdf) [Accessed March 29 2011]

    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Falagas MEPitsouni EIMalietzis GAPappas G: Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22:3383422008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fuller CDChoi MThomas CR Jr: Bibliometric analysis of radiation oncology departmental scholarly publication productivity at domestic residency training institutions. J Am Coll Radiol 6:1121182009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Gbadebo ALReinhardt UE: Economists on academic medicine: elephants in a porcelain shop?. Health Aff (Millwood) 20:1481522001

  • 11

    Hirsch JE: An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16569165722005

  • 12

    Ioannidis JPPatsopoulos NAKavvoura FKTatsioni AEvangelou EKouri I: International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal. BMC Med 5:302007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Itagaki MWPile-Spellman J: Factors associated with academic radiology research productivity. Radiology 237:7747802005

  • 14

    Jacso P: Testing the calculation of a realistic h-index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster. Library Trends 56:7848152008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Kulasegarah JFenton JE: Comparison of the h index with standard bibliometric indicators to rank influential otolaryngologists in Europe and North America. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:4554582010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Kulkarni AVAziz BShams IBusse JW: Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA 302:109210962009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lee JKraus KLCouldwell WT: Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:3873922009

  • 18

    Moses H IIIMartin JB: What should be done to improve the productivity of neurological research?. Ann Neurol 60:6476512006

  • 19

    Ponce FALozano AM: Academic impact and rankings of American and Canadian neurosurgical departments as assessed using the h index. J Neurosurg 113:4474572010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Rad AEBrinjikji WCloft HJKallmes DF: The H-index in academic radiology. Acad Radiol 17:8178212010

  • 21

    Spearman CMQuigley MJQuigley MRWilberger JE: Survey of the h index for all of academic neurosurgery: another power-law phenomenon?. J Neurosurg 113:9299332010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Wu JJRamirez CCAlonso CABerman BTyring SK: Ranking the dermatology programs based on measurements of academic achievement. Dermatol Online J 13:32007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 351 351 23
Full Text Views 265 208 4
PDF Downloads 156 133 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar