Geographic variation and regional trends in adoption of endovascular techniques for cerebral aneurysms

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Temple University School of Medicine,
  • | 2 Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, and
  • | 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Considerable evolution has occurred in treatment options for cerebral aneurysms. Development of endovascular techniques has produced a significant change in the treatment of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Adoption of endovascular techniques and increasing numbers of patients undergoing endovascular treatment may affect health care expenditures. Geographic assessment of growth in endovascular procedures has not been assessed.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried for ICD-9 codes for clipping and coiling of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms from 2002 to 2008. Patients with ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms were compared according to in-hospital deaths, hospital length of stay, total hospital cost, and selected procedure. Hospital costs were adjusted to bring all costs to 2008 equivalents. Regional variation over the course of the study was explored.

Results

The NIS recorded 12,588 ruptured cerebral aneurysm cases (7318 clipped and 5270 coiled aneurysms) compared with 11,606 unruptured aneurysm cases (5216 clipped and 6390 coiled aneurysms), representing approximately 121,000 aneurysms treated in the study period. Linear regression analysis found that the number of patients treated endovascularly increased over time, with the total number of endovascular patients increasing from 17.28% to 57.59% for ruptured aneurysms and from 29.70% to 62.73% for unruptured aneurysms (p < 0.00001). Patient age, elective status, and comorbidities increased the likelihood of endovascular treatment (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00004, and p < 0.02, respectively). In patients presenting with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), endovascular treatments were more commonly chosen in urban and academic medical centers (p = 0.009 and p = 0.05, respectively). In-hospital deaths decreased over the study period in patients with both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms (p < 0.00001); presentation with SAH remained the single greatest predictor of death (OR 38.09, p < 0.00001). Geographic analysis showed growth in endovascular techniques concentrated in eastern and western coastal states, with substantial variation in adoption of endovascular techniques (range of percentage of endovascular patients [2008] 0%–92%). There were higher costs in patients treated endovascularly, but these differences were likely secondary to presenting diagnosis and site-of-service variations.

Conclusions

The NIS database reveals a significant increase in the use of endovascular techniques, with the majority of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms treated endovascularly by 2008. Differences in hospital costs between open and endovascular techniques are likely secondary to patient and site-of-service factors. Presentation with SAH was the primary factor affecting hospital cost and a greater percentage of endovascular procedures completed at urban academic medical centers. There is substantial regional variation in the adoption of endovascular techniques.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

AHRQ = Agency for Health Care Research and Quality; CHF = congestive heart failure; ISAT = International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial; LOS = length of stay; NIS = National Inpatient Sample; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $515.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $612.00
  • 1

    Andaluz N, & Zuccarello M: Recent trends in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms: analysis of a nationwide inpatient database. J Neurosurg 108:11631169, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Baicker K, , Fisher ES, & Chandra A: Malpractice liability costs and the practice of medicine in the Medicare program. Health Aff (Millwood) 26:841852, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bairstow P, , Dodgson A, , Linto J, & Khangure M: Comparison of cost and outcome of endovascular and neurosurgical procedures in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Australas Radiol 46:249251, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Barker FG II, , Amin-Hanjani S, , Butler WE, , Hoh BL, , Rabinov JD, & Pryor JC, et al.: Age-dependent differences in short-term outcome after surgical or endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996–2000. Neurosurgery 54:1830, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Brilstra EH, , Rinkel GJ, , van der Graaf Y, , Sluzewski M, , Groen RJ, & Lo RT, et al.: Quality of life after treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms by neurosurgical clipping or by embolisation with coils. A prospective, observational study. Cerebrovasc Dis 17:4452, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Britz GW, , Salem L, , Newell DW, , Eskridge J, & Flum DR: Impact of surgical clipping on survival in unruptured and ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a population-based study. Stroke 35:13991403, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Fisher ES, , Bynum JP, & Skinner JS: Slowing the growth of health care costs—lessons from regional variation. N Engl J Med 360:849852, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Fisher ES, , Wennberg DE, , Stukel TA, & Gottlieb DJ: Variations in the longitudinal efficiency of academic medical centers. Health Aff (Millwood) Suppl VAR19VAR32, 2004. (http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/early/2004/10/07/hlthaff.var.19.citation) [Accessed January 7, 2011]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Fisher ES, , Wennberg DE, , Stukel TA, , Gottlieb DJ, , Lucas FL, & Pinder EL: The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med 138:288298, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Flett LM, , Chandler CS, , Giddings D, & Gholkar A: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: management strategies and clinical outcomes in a regional neuroscience center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:367372, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Halkes PH, , Wermer MJ, , Rinkel GJ, & Buskens E: Direct costs of surgical clipping and endovascular coiling of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Cerebrovasc Dis 22:4045, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Higashida RT, , Lahue BJ, , Torbey MT, , Hopkins LN, , Leip E, & Hanley DF: Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:146151, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Hoh BL, , Chi YY, , Dermott MA, , Lipori PJ, & Lewis SB: The effect of coiling versus clipping of ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms on length of stay, hospital cost, hospital reimbursement, and surgeon reimbursement at the university of Florida. Neurosurgery 64:614621, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Hoh BL, , Chi YY, , Lawson MF, , Mocco J, & Barker FG II: Length of stay and total hospital charges of clipping versus coiling for ruptured and unruptured adult cerebral aneurysms in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database 2002 to 2006. Stroke 41:337342, 2010

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Hoh BL, , Rabinov JD, , Pryor JC, , Carter BS, & Barker FG II: Inhospital morbidity and mortality after endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States, 1996–2000: effect of hospital and physician volume. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:14091420, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Javadpour M, , Jain H, , Wallace MC, , Willinsky RA, , ter Brugge KG, & Tymianski M: Analysis of cost related to clinical and angiographic outcomes of aneurysm patients enrolled in the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial in a North American setting. Neurosurgery 56:886894, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Johnston SC: Effect of endovascular services and hospital volume on cerebral aneurysm treatment outcomes. Stroke 31:111117, 2000

  • 18

    Johnston SC, , Dudley RA, , Gress DR, & Ono L: Surgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at university hospitals. Neurology 52:17991805, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Johnston SC, , Higashida RT, , Barrow DL, , Caplan LR, , Dion JE, & Hademenos G, et al.: Recommendations for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Cerebrovascular Imaging of the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology. Stroke 33:25362544, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Johnston SC, , Wilson CB, , Halbach VV, , Higashida RT, , Dowd CF, & McDermott MW, et al.: Endovascular and surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of risks. Ann Neurol 48:1119, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Johnston SC, , Zhao S, , Dudley RA, , Berman MF, & Gress DR: Treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in California. Stroke 32:597605, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Maud A, , Lakshminarayan K, , Suri MF, , Vazquez G, , Lanzino G, & Qureshi AI: Cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment for ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 110:880886, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Molyneux AJ, , Kerr RS, , Yu LM, , Clarke M, , Sneade M, & Yarnold JA, et al.: International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809817, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Mullan S, , Beckman F, , Vailati G, , Karasick J, & Dobben G: An experimental approach to the problem of cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg 21:838845, 1964

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Niskanen M, , Koivisto T, , Ronkainen A, , Rinne J, & Ruokonen E: Resource use after subarachnoid hemorrhage: comparison between endovascular and surgical treatment. Neurosurgery 54:10811088, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Serbinenko FA: Balloon catheterization and occlusion of major cerebral vessels. J Neurosurg 41:125145, 1974

  • 27

    Sirovich B, , Gallagher PM, , Wennberg DE, & Fisher ES: Discretionary decision making by primary care physicians and the cost of U.S. Health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 3:813823, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Wolstenholme J, , Rivero-Arias O, , Gray A, , Molyneux AJ, , Kerr RS, & Yarnold JA, et al.: Treatment pathways, resource use, and costs of endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping after aSAH. Stroke 39:111119, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 659 173 11
Full Text Views 199 19 3
PDF Downloads 88 16 5
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0