Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: analysis of complications in the authors' initial 800 patients

A review

Restricted access

Object

The development of endoscopic endonasal approaches, albeit in the early stages, represents part of the continuous evolution of skull base surgery. During this early period, it is important to determine the safety of these approaches by analyzing surgical complications to identify and eliminate their causes.

Methods

The authors reviewed all perioperative complications associated with endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries performed between July 1998 and June 2007 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Results

This study includes the data for the authors' first 800 patients, comprising 399 male (49.9%) and 401 female (50.1%) patients with a mean age of 49.21 years (range 3–96 years). Pituitary adenomas (39.1%) and meningiomas (11.8%) were the 2 most common pathologies. A postoperative CSF leak represented the most common complication, occurring in 15.9% of the patients. All patients with a postoperative CSF leak were successfully treated with a lumbar drain and/or another endoscopic approach, except for 1 patient who required a transcranial repair. The incidence of postoperative CSF leaks decreased significantly with the adoption of vascularized tissue for reconstruction of the skull base (< 6%). Transient neurological deficits occurred in 20 patients (2.5%) and permanent neurological deficits in 14 patients (1.8%). Intracranial infection and systemic complications were encountered and successfully treated in 13 (1.6%) and 17 (2.1%) patients, respectively. Seven patients died during the 30-day perioperative period, 6 of systemic illness and 1 of infection (overall mortality 0.9%).

Conclusions

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery provides a viable median corridor based on anatomical landmarks and is customized according to the specific pathological process. This corridor should be considered as the sole access or may be combined with traditional approaches. With the incremental acquisition of skills and experience, endoscopic endonasal approaches have an acceptable safety profile in select patients presenting with various skull base pathologies.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AVM = arteriovenous malformation; BA = basilar artery; CA = carotid artery; CN = cranial nerve; EEA = endoscopic endonasal approach; ICA = internal CA; MPW = medial pterygoid wedge; VA = vertebral artery.

Article Information

Current affiliation for Dr. Kassam: University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Current affiliation for Dr. Prevedello: The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

Current affiliation for Dr. Carrau: Institute at Saint John's Hospital, Santa Monica, California.

Current affiliation for Dr. Thomas: Beth Israel Deaconness Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Current institution for Dr. Zanation: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Address correspondence to: Daniel M. Prevedello, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, The Ohio State University, N-1011 Doan Hall, 410 West 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio, 43210. email: daniel.prevedello@osumc.edu.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online December 17, 2010; DOI: 10.3171/2010.10.JNS09406.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Illustration showing the skull base in an inferior view. Each colored area represents a module of expanded endonasal approach at the skull base. CP-AF = coronal plane anterior fossa; CP-MF = coronal plane middle fossa; CP-PF = coronal plane posterior fossa; TC = transclival (pink area); TC = transcribriform (white area); TO = transodontoid; TP/T = transplanum/transtuberculum; TS = transsellar.

  • View in gallery

    Transsellar approach. A and B: Coronal (A) and sagittal (B) contrast-enhanced MR images showing preoperative images of a hemorrhagic macroadenoma with suprasellar extension. C and D: Postoperative coronal (C) and sagittal (D) MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion and preservation of the pituitary gland at the right side of the sella. E: Intraoperative photograph obtained after resection of the lesion through an endoscopic endonasal transsellar approach. Note the diaphragmatic herniation toward the sphenoid sinus passing the level of the sellar dura.

  • View in gallery

    Transplanum approach. A and B: Preoperative, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted coronal (A) and sagittal (B) MR images of a tuberculum sellae meningioma. C and D: Corresponding postoperative coronal (C) and sagittal (D) MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion. The arrow in D indicates the reconstruction of the skull base with a vascularized enhanced nasoseptal flap. E: Intraoperative endoscopic view of the suprasellar region after complete extirpation of a tuberculum sellae meningioma, showing the optic chiasm, the pituitary stalk, the ICA on the right side, and the anterior communicating artery (Acom). The pituitary gland is shown in the sella protected by intact dura. The superior hypophysial arteries (SHa) were preserved and are seen bilaterally.

  • View in gallery

    Transcribriform approach. A and B: Preoperative axial (A) and coronal (B) T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced MR images of an olfactory groove meningioma. C and D: Postoperative axial (C) and coronal (D) T1-weighted, contrast-enhanced MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion. The arrow in D indicates the skull base reconstruction using a vascularized nasoseptal flap. E: Intraoperative photograph of a transcribriform view during sharp dissection of the tumor (meningioma). The interface between the meningioma and the left frontal lobe is visible. The frontopolar artery (art.) is shown over the left gyrus rectus.

  • View in gallery

    Transclival approach. A and B: Preoperative axial (A) and sagittal (B) contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted MR images showing a neurenteric cyst. Note the arrows indicating the neurenteric cyst delineated by the yellow dotted lines. C and D: Postoperative axial (C) and sagittal (D) contrast-enhanced, T1-weighted MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion. E: Intraoperative oblique, 45° endoscopic view of the prepontine cistern showing the brainstem at the level of the pons, CN V (V), CN VI (VI), and the complex of CNs VII and VIII (VII and VIII).

  • View in gallery

    Transodontoid approach. A and B: Preoperative axial (A) and sagittal (B) CT angiograms showing a foramen magnum meningioma. C and D: Postoperative axial (C) and sagittal (D) CT angiograms demonstrating resection of the bone and lesion. E: Intraoperative view of the cervicomedullary junction during resection of a foramen magnum meningioma (Tu). The anterior spinal artery (ASa) is seen ventral to the spinal cord. The inferior rootlet of the hypoglossal nerve is seen on the left side (XII). Note the C-1 ventral root (C1) and the dentate ligament (DL). Bilateral VAs are identified (RVa and LVa).

  • View in gallery

    Coronal plane, anterior fossa approach (transorbital). A and B: Preoperative axial non–contrast-enhanced (A) and coronal contrast-enhanced (B) T1-weighted MR images showing an expansive intraconal lesion in the right orbit (arrows) that proved to be a hemangioma. C and D: Postoperative axial non–contrast-enhanced (C) and coronal contrast-enhanced (D) T1-weighted MR images demonstrating total resection of the lesion. (The decompressed right optic nerve can be seen in C.) The yellow arrow indicates the enhancing nasoseptal flap that was used for reconstruction. E: Intraoperative view of the right orbit (RO) from a 45° endoscope, in which the sphenoid sinus (SS) is seen posteriorly. The window used for dissection was between the middle rectus muscle (MRM) and the inferior rectus muscle (IRM). The hemangioma (Tu) is visualized during resection.

  • View in gallery

    Coronal plane, middle fossa approach. A and B: Preoperative axial (A) and coronal (B) contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images showing an expansive, homogeneously enhancing lesion in the right mesial temporal fossa, which proved to be a trigeminal schwannoma. C and D: Postoperative axial (C) and coronal (D) contrast-enhanced MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion through an endonasal route. The yellow arrow indicates the nasoseptal flap that was used for reconstruction. E: Intraoperative view of the Meckel cave (MC) after the trigeminal schwannoma was removed using a 0° endoscope. Note the preserved V1 branch of the trigeminal nerve preserved superiorly in the field at the level of the superior orbital fissure (SOF). The sella is seen posteriorly as well as the clival recess (CR). The right ICA was skeletonized and kept covered by the periosteum of the carotid canal.

  • View in gallery

    Coronal plane, posterior fossa approach. A and B: Preoperative axial (A) and coronal (B) T1-weighted contrastenhanced MR images showing a right jugular foramen enhancing lesion, which proved to be a chondrosarcoma. Note the ICA is pushed laterally by the tumor, creating an endonasal corridor for resection (A). C and D: Postoperative axial (C) and coronal (D) contrast-enhanced MR images demonstrating complete resection of the lesion through an endonasal route. The yellow arrow indicates the nasoseptal flap that was used for reconstruction. E: Intraoperative endoscopic view after resection of a posterior fossa lesion using an EEA. Note the right internal auditory canal (IAC) with CNs VII and VIII. Inferiorly, the area of the jugular foramen (JF) is seen with CNs IX and X.

  • View in gallery

    Contrast-enhanced MR images of a giant pituitary adenoma. A and B: Preoperative coronal (A) and sagittal (B) images. C and D: Postoperative coronal (C) and sagittal (D) images demonstrating an extensive resection of the tumor with preservation of the pituitary gland.

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing the distribution of expanded endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries during the 1st 9 years of development at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, divided into levels of complexity (II–V). Cases from 2007 were not included in this graph to avoid confusion since it is represented by a half year in this series. Note that we did not systematically pursue Level IV (intradural) and Level V (paramedian) approaches until the 4th and 5th years of our endoscopic experience, respectively.

References

  • 1

    Barrow DLTindall GT: Loss of vision after transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 27:60681990

  • 2

    Bragg KVanbalen NCook N: Future trends in minimally invasive surgery. AORN J 82:100610142005

  • 3

    Cappabianca PAlfieri Ade Divitiis E: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach to the sella: towards functional endoscopic pituitary surgery (FEPS). Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41:66731998

  • 4

    Cappabianca PCavallo LMColao Ade Divitiis E: Surgical complications associated with the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg 97:2932982002

  • 5

    Cappabianca PCavallo LMde Divitiis E: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 55:9339412004

  • 6

    Carrau RLJho HDKo Y: Transnasal-transsphenoidal endoscopic surgery of the pituitary gland. Laryngoscope 106:9149181996

  • 7

    Cavallo LMMessina AGardner PEsposito FKassam ABCappabianca P: Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 19:1E52005

  • 8

    Cinalli GCappabianca Pde Falco RSpennato PCianciulli ECavallo LM: Current state and future development of intracranial neuroendoscopic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 2:3513732005

  • 9

    Ciric IRagin ABaumgartner CPierce D: Complications of transsphenoidal surgery: results of a national survey, review of the literature, and personal experience. Neurosurgery 40:2252371997

  • 10

    de Divitiis ECappabianca PCavallo LMEsposito Fde Divitiis OMessina A: Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 61:5 Suppl 22192282007

  • 11

    de Divitiis ECavallo LMEsposito FStella LMessina A: Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62:6 Suppl 3119212012008

  • 12

    Dehdashti ARGanna AKarabatsou KGentili F: Pure endoscopic endonasal approach for pituitary adenomas: early surgical results in 200 patients and comparison with previous microsurgical series. Neurosurgery 62:100610172008

  • 13

    Deschler DGGutin PHMamelak ANMcDermott MWKaplan MJ: Complications of anterior skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 6:1131181996

  • 14

    Dias FL GMKligerman JLopes HFWance JRPaiva FP: Complications of anterior craniofacial resection. Head Neck 21:12201999

  • 15

    Doglietto FPrevedello DMJane JA JrHan JLaws ER Jr: Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery—from Philipp Bozzini to the First World Congress of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Neurosurg Focus 19:6E32005

  • 16

    Fahlbusch RBuchfelder MMüller OA: Transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J R Soc Med 79:2622691986

  • 17

    Fahlbusch RSchott W: Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 96:2352432002

  • 18

    Fatemi NDusick JRde Paiva Neto MAKelly DF: The endonasal microscopic approach for pituitary adenomas and other parasellar tumors: a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery 63:4 Suppl 22442562008

  • 19

    Feiz-Erfan IHan PPSpetzler RFHorn EMKlopfenstein JDPorter RW: The radical transbasal approach for resection of anterior and midline skull base lesions. J Neurosurg 103:4854902005

  • 20

    Frank GPasquini E: Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the cavernous sinus: surgical approaches. Neurosurgery 50:6752002

  • 21

    Frank GPasquini EDoglietto FMazzatenta DSciarretta VFarneti G: The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59:1 Suppl 1ONS75ONS832006

  • 22

    Frank GSciarretta VCalbucci FFarneti GMazzatenta DPasquini E: The endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach for the treatment of cranial base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. Neurosurgery 59:1 Suppl 1ONS50ONS572006

  • 23

    Gardner PAKassam ABSnyderman CHCarrau RLMintz AHGrahovac S: Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 109:6162008

  • 24

    Gardner PAKassam ABThomas ASnyderman CHCarrau RLMintz AH: Endoscopic endonasal resection of anterior cranial base meningiomas. Neurosurgery 63:36542008

  • 25

    Hadad GBassagasteguy LCarrau RLMataza JCKassam ASnyderman CH: A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:188218862006

  • 26

    Hentschel SJNader RSuki DDastgir ACallender DLDe-Monte F: Craniofacial resections in the elderly: an outcome study. J Neurosurg 101:9359432004

  • 27

    Jane JA JrHan JPrevedello DMJagannathan JDumont ASLaws ER Jr: Perspectives on endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurg Focus 19:6E22005

  • 28

    Jho HD: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurooncol 54:1871952001

  • 29

    Kassam ASnyderman CHMintz AGardner PCarrau RL: Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 19:1E32005

  • 30

    Kassam ASnyderman CHMintz AGardner PCarrau RL: Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 19:1E42005

  • 31

    Kassam AThomas AJSnyderman CCarrau RGardner PMintz A: Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 106:2 Suppl75862007

  • 32

    Kassam ABGardner PSnyderman CMintz ACarrau R: Expanded endonasal approach: fully endoscopic, completely transnasal approach to the middle third of the clivus, petrous bone, middle cranial fossa, and infratemporal fossa. Neurosurg Focus 19:1E62005

  • 33

    Kassam ABGardner PAMintz ASnyderman CHCarrau RLHorowitz M: Endoscopic endonasal clipping of an unsecured superior hypophyseal artery aneurysm. Technical note. J Neurosurg 107:104710522007

  • 34

    Kassam ABMintz AHGardner PAHorowitz MBCarrau RLSnyderman CH: The expanded endonasal approach for an endoscopic transnasal clipping and aneurysmorrhaphy of a large VA aneurysm: technical case report. Neurosurgery 59:1 Suppl 1ONSE162ONSE1652006

  • 35

    Kassam ABPrevedello DMCarrau RLSnyderman CHGardner POsawa S: The front door to Meckel's cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach—technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery 64:3 Suppl71832009

  • 36

    Kassam ABPrevedello DMThomas AGardner PMintz ASnyderman C: Endoscopic endonasal pituitary transposition for a transdorsum sellae approach to the interpeduncular cistern. Neurosurgery 62:3 Suppl 157742008

  • 37

    Kassam ABSnyderman CGardner PCarrau RSpiro R: The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 57:1 SupplE2132005

  • 38

    Kassam ABThomas ACarrau RLSnyderman CHVescan APrevedello D: Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 63:1 Suppl 1ONS44ONS532008

  • 39

    Kassam ABThomas AJZimmer LASnyderman CHCarrau RLMintz A: Expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic completely transnasal resection of a skull base arteriovenous malformation. Childs Nerv Syst 23:4914982007

  • 40

    Kassam ABVescan ADCarrau RLPrevedello DMGardner PMintz AH: Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 108:1771832008

  • 41

    Kryzanski JTAnnino DJ JrHeilman CB: Complication avoidance in the treatment of malignant tumors of the skull base. Neurosurg Focus 12:5e112002

  • 42

    Kumar UGill IS: Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery. Curr Urol Rep 7:1201242006

  • 43

    Laarman GJKiemeneij FMueller RGuagliumi GCobaugh MSerruys PW: Feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a novel ePTFE-covered self-expanding stent in saphenous vein graft lesions: the Symbiot II trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 64:3613682005

  • 44

    Laws ER Jr: Vascular complications of transsphenoidal surgery. Pituitary 2:1631701999

  • 45

    Liu CYWang MYApuzzo ML: The evolution and future of minimalism in neurological surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 20:7837892004

  • 46

    McIntyre TJones DB: Training methods for minimally invasive bariatric surgery. Surg Technol Int 14:57602005

  • 47

    Mendelson DNAbramson RGRubin RJ: State involvement in medical technology assessment. Health Aff (Millwood) 14:83981995

  • 48

    Origitano TCPetruzzelli GJLeonetti JPVandevender D: Combined anterior and anterolateral approaches to the cranial base: complication analysis, avoidance, and management. Neurosurgery 58:4 Suppl 2ONS327ONS3372006

  • 49

    Pamir MNOzduman KBelirgen MKilic TOzek MM: Outcome determinants of pterional surgery for tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 147:112111302005

  • 50

    Prevedello DMDoglietto FJane JA JrJagannathan JHan JLaws ER Jr: History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg 107:2062132007

  • 51

    Prevedello DMThomas AGardner PSnyderman CHCarrau RLKassam AB: Endoscopic endonasal resection of a synchronous pituitary adenoma and a tuberculum sellae meningioma: technical case report. Neurosurgery 60:4 Suppl 2E4012007

  • 52

    Rutka JT: Endonasal resection of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 109:352008

  • 53

    Schick UHassler W: Surgical management of tuberculum sellae meningiomas: involvement of the optic canal and visual outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:9779832005

  • 54

    Sekhar LNPranatartiharan RChanda AWright DC: Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the skull base: results and complications of surgical management. Neurosurg Focus 10:3E22001

  • 55

    Semple PLLaws ER Jr: Complications in a contemporary series of patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg 91:1751791999

  • 56

    Sen CTriana A: Cranial chordomas: results of radical excision. Neurosurg Focus 10:3E32001

  • 57

    Solari DMagro FCappabianca PCavallo LMSamii AEsposito F: Anatomical study of the pterygopalatine fossa using an endoscopic endonasal approach: spatial relations and distances between surgical landmarks. J Neurosurg 106:1571632007

  • 58

    Stippler MGardner PASnyderman CHCarrau RLPrevedello DMKassam AB: Endoscopic endonasal approach for clival chordomas. Neurosurgery 64:2682782009

  • 59

    Sudhakar NRay AVafidis JA: Complications after transsphenoidal surgery: our experience and a review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 18:5075122004

TrendMD

Cited By

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 521 521 68
Full Text Views 460 460 12
PDF Downloads 127 127 11
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar