Intraoperative computed tomography registration and electromagnetic neuronavigation for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery: accuracy and time effectiveness

Clinical article

View More View Less
  • 1 Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington; and
  • 2 Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

The authors assessed the feasibility, anatomical accuracy, and cost effectiveness of frameless electromagnetic (EM) neuronavigation in conjunction with portable intraoperative CT (iCT) registration for transsphenoidal adenomectomy (TSA).

Methods

A prospective database was established for data obtained in 208 consecutive patients who underwent TSA in which the iCT/EM navigation technique was used. Data were compared with those acquired in a retrospective cohort of 65 consecutive patients in whom fluoroscope-assisted TSA had been performed by the same surgeon. All patients in both groups underwent transnasal removal of pituitary adenomas or neuroepithelial cysts, using identical surgical techniques with an operating microscope. In the iCT/EM technique–treated cases, a portable iCT scan was obtained immediately prior to surgery for registration to the EM navigation system, which did not require rigid head fixation. Preexisting (nonnavigation protocol) MR imaging studies were fused with the iCT scans to enable 3D navigation based on MR imaging data. The accuracy of the navigation system was determined in the first 50 iCT/EM cases by visual concordance of the navigation probe location to 5 preselected bony landmarks. For all patients in both cohorts, total operating room time, incision-to-closure time, and relative costs of imaging and surgical procedures were determined from hospital records.

Results

In every case, iCT registration was successful and preoperative MR images were fused to iCT scans without affecting navigation accuracy. There was 100% concordance between probe tip location and predetermined bony loci in the first 50 cases involving the iCT/EM technique. Total operating room time was significantly less in the iCT/EM cases (mean 108.9 ± 24.3 minutes [208 patients]) compared with the fluoroscopy group (mean 121.1 ± 30.7 minutes [65 patients]; p < 0.001). Similarly, incision-to-closure time was significantly less for the iCT/EM cases (mean 61.3 ± 18.2 minutes) than for the fluoroscopy cases (mean 71.75 ± 19.0 minutes; p < 0.001). Relative overall costs for iCT/EM technique and intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy were comparable; increased costs for navigation equipment were offset by savings in operating room costs for shorter procedures.

Conclusions

The use of iCT/MR imaging–guided neuronavigation for transsphenoidal surgery is a time-effective, cost-efficient, safe, and technically beneficial technique.

Abbreviations used in this paper: iCT = intraoperative CT; EM = electromagnetic; TSA = transsphenoidal adenomectomy.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Marc R. Mayberg, M.D., Swedish Neuroscience Institute, 500 17th Avenue, Suite #500, Seattle, Washington 98122. email: marc.mayberg@swedish.org.

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online June 18, 2010; DOI: 10.3171/2010.5.JNS091821.

  • 1

    Ahn JY, , Jung JY, , Kim J, , Lee KS, & Kim SH: How to overcome the limitations to determine the resection margin of pituitary tumours with low-field intra-operative MRI during transsphenoidal surgery: usefulness of Gadolinium-soaked cotton pledgets. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 150:763771, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Cappabianca P, , Cavallo LM, & de Divitiis E: Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 55:933941, 2004

  • 3

    Cunningham E, & Mayberg MR, Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Barnett GH, , Maciunas RJ, & Roberts DW: Computer-Assisted Neurosurgery New York, Taylor & Francis Group, 2006. 209220

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Elias WJ, , Chadduck JB, , Alden TD, & Laws ER Jr: Frameless stereotaxy for transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 45:271277, 1999

  • 5

    Fatemi N, , Dusick JR, , de Paiva Neto MA, & Kelly DF: The endonasal microscopic approach for pituitary adenomas and other parasellar tumors: a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery 63:4 Suppl 2 244256, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Gerlach R, , du Mesnil de Rochemont R, , Gasser T, , Marquardt G, , Reusch J, & Imoehl L, : Feasibility of Polestar N20, an ultra-low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging system in resection control of pituitary macroadenomas: lessons learned from the first 40 cases. Neurosurgery 63:272285, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Hardy J: Neuronavigation in pituitary surgery. Surg Neurol 52:648649, 1999

  • 8

    Hardy J, & Wigser SM: Trans-sphenoidal surgery of pituitary fossa tumors with televised radiofluoroscopic control. J Neurosurg 23:612619, 1965

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hayhurst C, , Byrne P, , Eldridge PR, & Mallucci CL: Application of electromagnetic technology to neuronavigation: a revolution in image-guided neurosurgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 111:11791184, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Heilman CB, , Shucart WA, & Rebeiz EE: Endoscopic sphenoidotomy approach to the sella. Neurosurgery 41:602607, 1997

  • 11

    Jagannathan J, , Prevedello DM, , Ayer VS, , Dumont AS, , Jane JA, & Laws ER: Computer assisted frameless stereotaxy in transsphenoidal surgery at a single institution: review of 176 cases. Neurosurg Focus 20:2 E9, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Jane JA Jr, , Thapar K, , Alden TD, & Laws ER Jr: Fluoroscopic frameless stereotaxy for transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 48:13021308, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Kawamata T, , Iseki H, , Shibasaki T, & Hori T: Endoscopic augmented reality navigation system for endonasal transsphenoidal surgery to treat pituitary tumors: technical note. Neurosurgery 50:13931397, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Mayberg MR, , LaPresto E, & Cunningham EJ: Image-guided endoscopy: description of technique and potential applications. Neurosurg Focus 19:1 E10, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    McCutcheon IE, , Kitagawa RS, , Demasi PF, , Law BK, & Friend KE: Frameless stereotactic navigation in transsphenoidal surgery: comparison with fluoroscopy. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 82:4348, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Nimsky C, , Ganslandt O, & Fahlbusch R: Comparing 0.2 tesla with 1.5 tesla intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of setup, workflow, and efficiency. Acad Radiol 12:10651079, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Nimsky C, , Ganslandt O, , Von Keller B, , Romstöck J, & Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients. Radiology 233:6778, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Ohhashi G, , Kamio M, , Abe T, , Otori N, & Haruna S: Endoscopic transnasal approach to the pituitary lesions using a navigation system (InstaTrak system): technical note. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:120123, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Onizuka M, , Tokunaga Y, , Shibayama A, & Miyazaki H: Computer-assisted neurosurgical navigational system for transsphenoidal surgery—technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 41:565569, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Rosenow JM, & Sootsman WK: Application accuracy of an electromagnetic field-based image-guided navigation system. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 85:7581, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Rothman SL, , Kier EL, & Allen WE III: The radiology of transsphenoidal hypophysectomy: a review of 100 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 127:601606, 1976

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Schulder M, , Sernas TJ, & Carmel PW: Cranial surgery and navigation with a compact intraoperative MRI system. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 85:7986, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Shamir RR, , Freiman M, , Joskowicz L, , Spektor S, & Shoshan Y: Surface-based facial scan registration in neuronavigation procedures: a clinical study. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:12011206, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Spencer WR, , Das K, , Nwagu C, , Wenk E, , Schaefer SD, & Moscatello A, : Approaches to the sellar and parasellar region: anatomic comparison of the microscope versus endoscope. Laryngoscope 109:791794, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Suess O, , Picht T, , Kuehn B, , Mularski S, , Brock M, & Kombos T: Neuronavigation without rigid pin fixation of the head in left frontotemporal tumor surgery with intraoperative speech mapping. Neurosurgery 60:4 Suppl 2 330338, 2007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Thomale UW, , Stover JF, & Unterberg AW: The use of neuronavigation in transnasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Zentralbl Neurochir 66:126132, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Thoranaghatte R, , Garcia J, , Caversaccio M, , Widmer D, , Gonzalez Ballester MA, & Nolte LP, : Landmark-based augmented reality system for paranasal and transnasal endoscopic surgeries. Int J Med Robot 5:415422, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Vrionis FD, , Saatman D, , Sorenson J, & Brem S: Microscopic paraseptal sphenoidotomy approach for pituitary tumors. Cancer Contr 9:223231, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Walker DG, , Ohaegbulam C, & Black PM: Frameless stereotaxy as an alternative to fluoroscopy for transsphenoidal surgery: use of the InstaTrak-3000 and a novel headset. J Clin Neurosci 9:294297, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Wolfsberger S, , Neubauer A, , Bühler K, , Wegenkittl R, , Czech T, & Gentzsch S, : Advanced virtual endoscopy for endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 59:10011010, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Wu JS, , Shou XF, , Yao CJ, , Wang YF, , Zhuang DX, & Mao Y, : Transsphenoidal pituitary macroadenomas resection guided by PoleStar N20 low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with early postoperative high-field magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 65:6371, 2009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Zada G, , Kelly DF, , Cohan P, , Wang C, & Swerdloff R: Endonasal transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas and other sellar lesions: an assessment of efficacy, safety, and patient impressions. J Neurosurg 98:350358, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 337 149 4
Full Text Views 158 9 1
PDF Downloads 127 6 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0