The aim of this study was to study the effects of MR imaging on the electrical settings of deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems and their clinical consequences.
The authors studied the effects of 1.5-T MR imaging on the electrical settings of implanted DBS systems, including 1 or more monopolar or quadripolar leads, extension leads, and single- or dual-channel implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The IPG was switched off during the procedure and the voltage was set to 0. The impedances were checked before and after MR imaging.
Five hundred seventy patients were treated with DBS for movement disorders and underwent brain MR imaging after lead implantation and before IPG implantation. None of the patients experienced any adverse events. Thirty-one of these patients underwent 61 additional MR imaging sessions after the entire DBS system had been implanted. The authors report neither local cutaneous nor neurological disorders during or after the MR imaging session. No change in the IPG settings occurred when the magnet reed switch function remained disabled during the procedure.
This study demonstrates that 1.5-T MR imaging can be performed safely with continuous monitoring in patients with a DBS system. The ability to disable the magnet reed switch function of the IPG prevents any change in the electrical settings and thus any side effects. The increasing number of DBS indications and the widespread use of MR imaging indicates the need for defining safety guidelines for the use of MR imaging in patients with implanted neurostimulators.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online February 26, 2010; DOI: 10.3171/2010.1.JNS09951.
Baker KB, , Nyenhuis JA, , Hrdlicka G, , Rezai AR, , Tkach JA, & Shellock FG: Neurostimulation systems: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5- and 3-Tesla MR systems. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:72–77, 2005
Baker KB, , Tkach J, , Hall JD, , Nyenhuis JA, , Shellock FG, & Rezai AR: Reduction of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating in deep brain stimulation leads using a lead management device. Neurosurgery 57:4 Suppl 392–397, 2005
Bhidayasiri R, , Bronstein JM, , Sinha S, , Krahl SE, , Ahn S, & Behnke EJ, et al.: Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Imaging 23:549–555, 2005
Coubes P, , Vasques XA, , Tancu C, , Cif L, , Biolsi B, & Maldonado I, et al.: Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging feasibility in patients with implanted neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation. The Open Magnetic Resonance J 1:1–8, 2008
Elkelini MS, & Hassouna MM: Safety of MRI at 1.5Tesla in patients with implanted sacral nerve neurostimulator. Eur Urol 50:311–316, 2006
Georgi JC, , Stippich C, , Tronnier VM, & Heiland S: Active deep brain stimulation during MRI: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 51:380–388, 2004
Henderson JM, , Tkach J, , Phillips M, , Baker K, , Shellock FG, & Rezai AR: Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report. Neurosurgery 57:E1063, 2005
Kovacs N, , Nagy F, , Kover F, , Feldmann A, , Llumiguano C, & Janszky J, et al.: Implanted deep brain stimulator and 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1409–1412, 2006
Larson PS, , Richardson RM, , Starr PA, & Martin AJ: Magnetic resonance imaging of implanted deep brain stimulators: experience in a large series. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:92–100, 2008
Nutt JG, , Anderson VC, , Peacock JH, , Hammerstad JP, & Burchiel KJ: DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage. Neurology 56:1384–1386, 2001
Pollak P, & Krack P, Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Jankovic J, & Tolosa E: Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders ed 5 Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. 653–691
Rezai AR, , Baker KB, , Tkach JA, , Phillips M, , Hrdlicka G, & Sharan AD, et al.: Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation?. Neurosurgery 57:1056–1062, 2005
Rezai AR, , Finelli D, , Nyenhuis JA, , Hrdlicka G, , Tkach J, & Sharan A, et al.: Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:241–250, 2002
Rezai AR, , Lozano AM, , Crawley AP, , Joy ML, , Davis KD, & Kwan CL, et al.: Thalamic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: localization of cortical and subcortical activation with implanted electrodes. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90:583–590, 1999
Spiegel J, , Fuss G, , Backens M, , Reith W, , Magnus T, & Becker G, et al.: Transient dystonia following magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Case report. J Neurosurg 99:772–774, 2003
Tagliati M, , Jankovic J, , Pagan F, , Susatia F, , Isaias IU, & Okun MS: Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. Neuroimage 2 Suppl T53–T57, 2009
Tronnier VM, , Staubert A, , Hähnel S, & Sarem-Aslani A: Magnetic resonance imaging with implanted neurostimulators: an in vitro and in vivo study. Neurosurgery 44:118–126, 1999
Uitti RJ, , Tsuboi Y, , Pooley RA, , Putzke JD, , Turk MF, & Wszolek ZK, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging and deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 51:1423–1431, 2002
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 829 | 113 | 5 |
| Full Text Views | 212 | 25 | 1 |
| PDF Downloads | 162 | 29 | 2 |
| EPUB Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |