This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

Effects of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation systems

Clinical article

Valerie Fraix Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Valerie Fraix in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Stephan Chabardes Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Stephan Chabardes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Alexandre Krainik Neuroradiology Department, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, University Hospital of Grenoble;
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Alexandre Krainik in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Eric Seigneuret Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Eric Seigneuret in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
,
Sylvie Grand Neuroradiology Department, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, University Hospital of Grenoble;
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Sylvie Grand in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Jean-François Le Bas Neuroradiology Department, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Unit, University Hospital of Grenoble;
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Jean-François Le Bas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Paul Krack Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Paul Krack in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
,
Alim-Louis Benabid Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and
Clinatec, Direction des Recherches Technologiques/Laboratoire d'Electronique et des Technologies de l'Information, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Grenoble, France

Search for other papers by Alim-Louis Benabid in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D., Ph.D.
, and
Pierre Pollak Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery; and
INSERM U836, Grenoble Neuroscience Institute, Joseph Fourier University; and

Search for other papers by Pierre Pollak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 M.D.
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $536.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $636.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $536.00
USD  $636.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

Object

The aim of this study was to study the effects of MR imaging on the electrical settings of deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems and their clinical consequences.

Methods

The authors studied the effects of 1.5-T MR imaging on the electrical settings of implanted DBS systems, including 1 or more monopolar or quadripolar leads, extension leads, and single- or dual-channel implantable pulse generators (IPGs). The IPG was switched off during the procedure and the voltage was set to 0. The impedances were checked before and after MR imaging.

Results

Five hundred seventy patients were treated with DBS for movement disorders and underwent brain MR imaging after lead implantation and before IPG implantation. None of the patients experienced any adverse events. Thirty-one of these patients underwent 61 additional MR imaging sessions after the entire DBS system had been implanted. The authors report neither local cutaneous nor neurological disorders during or after the MR imaging session. No change in the IPG settings occurred when the magnet reed switch function remained disabled during the procedure.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that 1.5-T MR imaging can be performed safely with continuous monitoring in patients with a DBS system. The ability to disable the magnet reed switch function of the IPG prevents any change in the electrical settings and thus any side effects. The increasing number of DBS indications and the widespread use of MR imaging indicates the need for defining safety guidelines for the use of MR imaging in patients with implanted neurostimulators.

Abbreviations used in this paper:

DBS = deep brain stimulation; GPi = globus pallidus internus; IPG = implantable pulse generator; RF = radiofrequency; SAR = specific absorption rate; STN = subthalamic nucleus; Vim = ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Baker KB, , Nyenhuis JA, , Hrdlicka G, , Rezai AR, , Tkach JA, & Shellock FG: Neurostimulation systems: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5- and 3-Tesla MR systems. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:7277, 2005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Baker KB, , Tkach J, , Hall JD, , Nyenhuis JA, , Shellock FG, & Rezai AR: Reduction of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating in deep brain stimulation leads using a lead management device. Neurosurgery 57:4 Suppl 392397, 2005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Bhidayasiri R, , Bronstein JM, , Sinha S, , Krahl SE, , Ahn S, & Behnke EJ, et al.: Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain. Magn Reson Imaging 23:549555, 2005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Coubes P, , Vasques XA, , Tancu C, , Cif L, , Biolsi B, & Maldonado I, et al.: Cerebral magnetic resonance imaging feasibility in patients with implanted neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation. The Open Magnetic Resonance J 1:18, 2008

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Elkelini MS, & Hassouna MM: Safety of MRI at 1.5Tesla in patients with implanted sacral nerve neurostimulator. Eur Urol 50:311316, 2006

  • 6

    Georgi JC, , Stippich C, , Tronnier VM, & Heiland S: Active deep brain stimulation during MRI: a feasibility study. Magn Reson Med 51:380388, 2004

  • 7

    Henderson JM, , Tkach J, , Phillips M, , Baker K, , Shellock FG, & Rezai AR: Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson's disease: case report. Neurosurgery 57:E1063, 2005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Kovacs N, , Nagy F, , Kover F, , Feldmann A, , Llumiguano C, & Janszky J, et al.: Implanted deep brain stimulator and 1.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:14091412, 2006

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Larson PS, , Richardson RM, , Starr PA, & Martin AJ: Magnetic resonance imaging of implanted deep brain stimulators: experience in a large series. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:92100, 2008

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Nutt JG, , Anderson VC, , Peacock JH, , Hammerstad JP, & Burchiel KJ: DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage. Neurology 56:13841386, 2001

  • 11

    Pollak P, & Krack P, Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Jankovic J, & Tolosa E: Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders ed 5 Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007. 653691

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Rezai AR, , Baker KB, , Tkach JA, , Phillips M, , Hrdlicka G, & Sharan AD, et al.: Is magnetic resonance imaging safe for patients with neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation?. Neurosurgery 57:10561062, 2005

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Rezai AR, , Finelli D, , Nyenhuis JA, , Hrdlicka G, , Tkach J, & Sharan A, et al.: Neurostimulation systems for deep brain stimulation: in vitro evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-related heating at 1.5 tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:241250, 2002

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Rezai AR, , Lozano AM, , Crawley AP, , Joy ML, , Davis KD, & Kwan CL, et al.: Thalamic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging: localization of cortical and subcortical activation with implanted electrodes. Technical note. J Neurosurg 90:583590, 1999

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Spiegel J, , Fuss G, , Backens M, , Reith W, , Magnus T, & Becker G, et al.: Transient dystonia following magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Case report. J Neurosurg 99:772774, 2003

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Tagliati M, , Jankovic J, , Pagan F, , Susatia F, , Isaias IU, & Okun MS: Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. Neuroimage 2 Suppl T53T57, 2009

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Tronnier VM, , Staubert A, , Hähnel S, & Sarem-Aslani A: Magnetic resonance imaging with implanted neurostimulators: an in vitro and in vivo study. Neurosurgery 44:118126, 1999

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Uitti RJ, , Tsuboi Y, , Pooley RA, , Putzke JD, , Turk MF, & Wszolek ZK, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging and deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 51:14231431, 2002

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 829 113 5
Full Text Views 212 25 1
PDF Downloads 162 29 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0