Survey of the h index for all of academic neurosurgery: another power-law phenomenon?

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

The h index is a recently developed bibliometric that assesses an investigator's scientific impact with a single number. It has rapidly gained popularity in the physical and, more recently, medical sciences.

Methods

The h index for all 1120 academic neurosurgeons working at all Electronic Residency Application Service–listed training programs was determined by reference to Google Scholar. A random subset of 100 individuals was investigated in PubMed to determine the total number of publications produced.

Results

The median h index was 9 (range 0–68), with the 75th, 90th, and 95th percentiles being 17, 26, and 36, respectively. The h indices increased significantly with increasing academic rank, with the median for instructors, assistant professors, associate professors, and professors being 2, 5, 10, and 19, respectively (p < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis; all groups significantly different from each other except the difference between instructor and assistant professor [Conover]). Departmental chairs had a median h index of 22 (range 3–55) and program directors a median of 17 (range 0–62). Plot of the log of the rank versus h index demonstrated a remarkable linear pattern (R2 = 0.995, p < 0.0001), suggesting that this is a power-law relationship.

Conclusions

A survey of the h index for all of academic neurosurgery is presented. Results can be used for benchmark purposes. The distribution of the h index within an academic population is described for the first time and appears related to the ubiquitous power-law distribution.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: Matthew R. Quigley, M.D., Allegheny General Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, 420 East North Avenue, Suite 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212. email: q@mattquigley.com

Please include this information when citing this paper: published online May 14, 2010; DOI: 10.3171/2010.4.JNS091842.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Box-and-whisker plots of the h indices for various levels of academic rank. The box represents the 25th to 75th percentile, the line within the box the median, and the bars all values except outliers. Academic ranks: 1 = professor; 2 = associate professor; 3 = assistant professor; and 4 = instructor.

  • View in gallery

    Box-and-whisker plots of the h indices for departmental chairman (Chair) and program director (PD).

  • View in gallery

    Frequency distribution of all 1120 academic neurosurgeons by h index.

  • View in gallery

    Plot of the rank order (100 − percentile, also cumulative frequency) versus h index, demonstrating exponential decay characteristic.

  • View in gallery

    Plot of the log of the rank versus the h index with the associated least-squares line.

References

  • 1

    Benway BMKalidas PCabello JMBhayani SB: Does citation analysis reveal association between h-index and academic rank in urology?. Urology 74:30332009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Bornmann LDaniel HD: The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance?. EMBO Rep 10:262009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Choi MFuller CDThomas CR Jr: Estimation of citation-based scholarly activity among radiation oncology faculty at domestic residency-training institutions: 1996–2007. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1721782009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Egghe L: Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 69:1311522006

  • 5

    Günther RLevitin LSchapiro BWagner P: Zipf's law and the effect of ranking on probability distributions. Int J Theor Phys 35:3954171996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Hirsch JE: Does the H index have predictive power?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:19193191982007

  • 7

    Hirsch JE: An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16569165722005

  • 8

    Jeang KT: Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?. Retrovirology 4:422007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Kelly CDJennions MD: The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 21:1671702006

  • 10

    Lee JKraus KLCouldwell WT: Use of the h index in neurosurgery. Clinical article. J Neurosurg 111:3873922009

  • 11

    Mansilla RKöppen ECocho GMiramontes P: On the behavior of journal impact factor rank-order distribution. J Informetrics 1:1551602007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Martínez-Mekler GAlvarez Martínez RBeltrán del Río MMansilla RMiramontes PCocho G: Universality of rank-ordering distributions in the arts and sciences. PLoS One 4:e47912009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Radicchi FFortunato SCastellano C: Universality of citation distributions: toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:17268172722008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Reed WJ: The Pareto, Zipf and other power laws. Econ Lett 74:15192001

  • 15

    Zhang CT: The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations. PLoS One 4:e54292009

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 266 266 10
Full Text Views 196 151 7
PDF Downloads 107 101 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar