Postoperative radiographic findings in patients undergoing intracranial electrode monitoring for medically refractory epilepsy

Clinical article

Restricted access

Object

In this study the authors sought to determine whether any correlations existed between postimplantation head CT findings and the need to perform decompression surgery in patients with grid electrodes.

Methods

The authors identified 74 patients who underwent intracranial electrode monitoring for medically refractory epilepsy from January 2000 through June 2008. Only the 46 patients who had head CT scans available for review were included in the study. The authors were able to determine the number and types of electrodes placed as well as complications experienced. They reviewed the CT scans for abnormal findings including extraaxial fluid collections, intracranial hemorrhages, and signs of mass effect.

Results

All patients developed some degree of extraaxial fluid collection following the placement of intracranial electrodes. The maximum width of the extraaxial fluid collection and the degree of midline shift were not predictive of the need for decompressive surgery. The presence, but not degree, of midline shift was associated with the need for decompressive surgery. Likewise, the presence of ventricular asymmetry was correlated with the need for removal of the electrodes and bone flap. Patients without midline shift or ventricular asymmetry on CT did not require decompressive surgery.

Conclusions

After undergoing placement of intracranial electrodes all patients develop extraaxial fluid collections. In addition, many patients develop signs of mass effect including midline shift and ventricular asymmetry. When these findings are absent it is highly unlikely that surgical decompression is required.

Article Information

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Matthew A. Howard III, M.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242. email: matthew-howard@uiowa.edu.Please include this information when citing this paper: published online August 21, 2009; DOI: 10.3171/2009.7.JNS09838.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Fountas KNSmith JR: Subdural electrode-associated complications: a 20-year experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 85:2642722007

  • 2

    Hamer HMMorris HHMascha EJKarafa MTBingaman WEBej MD: Complications of invasive video-EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes. Neurology 58:971032002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Johnston JMMangano FTOjemann JGPark TSTrevathan ESmyth MD: Complications of invasive subdural electrode monitoring at St. Louis Children's Hospital, 1994–2005. J Neurosurg 105:3433472006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Lee WSLee JKLee SAKang JKKo TS: Complications and results of subdural grid electrode implantation in epilepsy surgery. Surg Neurol 54:3463512000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Mocco JKomotar RJLadouceur AKZacharia BEGoodman RRMcKhann GM II: Radiographic characteristics fail to predict clinical course after subdural electrode placement. Neurosurgery 58:1201252006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Onal COtsubo HAraki TChitoku SOchi AWeiss S: Complications of invasive subdural grid monitoring in children with epilepsy. J Neurosurg 98:101710262003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Silberbusch MARothman MIBergey GKZoarski GHZagardo MT: Subdural grid implantation for intracranial EEG recording: CT and MR appearance. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:108910931998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Swartz BERich JRDwan PSDeSalles AKaufman MHWalsh GO: The safety and efficacy of chronically implanted subdural electrodes: a prospective study. Surg Neurol 46:87931996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Van Gompel JJWorrell GABell MLPatrick TACascino GDRaffel C: Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural grid electrodes: techniques, complications, and outcomes. Neurosurgery 63:4982062008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Vives KLee SMcCarthy KSpencer DIntracranial monitoring. Winn HRYoumans JR: Youman's Neurological Surgery ed 5PhiladelphiaSaunders2004. 25512563

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Wiebe SBlume WTGirvin JPEliasziw M: Effectiveness and Efficiency of Surgery for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Study Group: A randomized, controlled trial of surgery for temporal-lobe epilepsy. N Engl J Med 345:3113182001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Wiggins GCElisevich KSmith BJ: Morbidity and infection in combined subdural grid and strip electrode investigation for intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy Res 37:73801999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Wong CHBirkett JByth KDexter MSomerville EGill D: Risk factors for complications during intracranial electrode recording in presurgical evaluation of drug resistant partial epilepsy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 151:37502009

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 205 171 10
Full Text Views 76 7 0
PDF Downloads 116 9 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar