Use of the h index in neurosurgery

Clinical article

Restricted access


Assessing academic productivity through simple quantification may overlook key information, and the use of statistical enumeration of academic output is growing. The h index, which incorporates both the total number of publications and the citations of those publications, has been recently proposed as an objective measure of academic productivity. The authors used several tools to calculate the h index for academic neurosurgeons to provide a basis for evaluating publishing by physicians.


The h index of randomly selected academic neurosurgeons from a sample of one-third of the academic programs in the US was calculated using data from Google Scholar and from the Scopus database. The mean h index for each academic rank was determined. The h indices were also correlated with various other factors (such as time spent practicing neurosurgery, authorship position) to identify how these factors influenced the h index. The h indices were then compared with other citation statistics to evaluate the robustness of this metric. Finally, h indices were also calculated for a sampling of physicians in other medical specialties for comparison.


As expected, the h index increased with academic rank and there was a statistically significant difference between each rank. A weighting based on position of authorship did not affect h indices. The h index was positively correlated with time since American Board of Neurological Surgery certification, and it was also correlated with other citation metrics. A comparison among medical specialties supports the assertion that h index values may not be comparable between fields, even closely related specialties.


The h index appears to be a robust statistic for comparing academic output of neurosurgeons. Within the field of academic neurosurgery, clear differences of h indices between academic ranks exist. On average, an increase of the h index by 5 appears to correspond to the next highest academic rank, with the exception of chairperson. The h index can be used as a tool, along with other evaluations, to evaluate an individual's productivity in the academic advancement process within the field of neurosurgery but should not be used for comparisons across medical specialties.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AWCR = age-weighted citation rate; df = degrees of freedom.

Article Information

Address correspondence to: William T. Couldwell, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, 175 North Medical Drive East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132. email:

* Dr. Lee and Ms. Kraus contributed equally to this study.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.



  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing the mean (± SD) h indices calculated from Google Scholar for each academic rank in a group of randomly selected academic neurosurgeons.

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing the correlation between weighted and non-weighted h indices for a subset of academic neurosurgeons (r = 0.99, df = 18; p < 0.0011).

  • View in gallery

    Graph showing the correlation between the h index and g index for a subset of academic neurosurgeons (r = 0.98, df = 18; p < 0.0001).

  • View in gallery

    Bar graph showing the mean h index of sample editorial board members in various medical specialties.


  • 1

    Ball P: Achievement index climbs the ranks. Nature 448:7372007

  • 2

    Committee on Publication Ethics (UK): 2005 Committee on Publication Ethics Report Harlston, UKCOPE2008. ( [Accessed 7 July 2008]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Egghe L: Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics 69:1311522006

  • 4

    Engqvist LFrommen JG: The h-index and self-citations. Trends Ecol Evol 23:2502522008

  • 5

    Falagas MEKavvadia P: “Eigenlob”: self-citation in biomedical journals”. FASEB J 20:103910422006

  • 6

    Gottfried ONRovit RLPopp AJKraus KLSimon ASCouldwell WT: Neurosurgical workforce trends in the United States. J Neurosurg 102:2022082005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Graf CWager EBowman AFiack SScott-Lichter DRobinson A: Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher's perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 152:1262007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    HEART Group: A statement on ethics from the HEART group. Circ Res 102:E104E1052008

  • 9

    Hirsch JE: Does the H index have predictive power?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:19193191982007

  • 10

    Hirsch JE: An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16569165722005

  • 11

    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Consensus Statement on Surgery Journal Authorship—2006: part II: scientific papers of the 117th Annual Meeting of the Southern Surgical Association. Ann Surg 243:7137142006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors: Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication ( [Accessed 7 July 2008]

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Jeang KT: Impact factor, H index, peer comparisons, and Retrovirology: is it time to individualize citation metrics?. Retrovirology 4:422007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Jin B: The AR-index: complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter 3:61997

  • 15

    Kelly CDJennions MD: H-index: age and sex make it unreliable. Nature 449:4032007

  • 16

    Kelly CDJennions MD: The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends Ecol Evol 21:1671702006

  • 17

    Kinney AL: National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:17943179472007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Levy MLMarshall GD: Authors' responsibilities: guidance for submission of manuscripts to medical journals. Prim Care Respir J 16:2032042007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Mishra DC: Citations: rankings weigh against developing nations. Nature 451:2442008

  • 20

    Purvis A: The h index: playing the numbers game. Trends Ecol Evol 21:4222006

  • 21

    Roediger HL III: The h index in science: a new measure of scholarly contribution. Academic Observer 19:152006

  • 22

    Sykorova JTurynova M: [The science-meter indicators (citation index, impact factor, Hirsch-index) and the evaluation of the scientific activity in medicine.]. Ceska Gynekol 72:3093122007. (Czech)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    van Haselen R: The h-index: a new way of assessing the scientific impact of individual CAM authors. Complement Ther Med 15:2252272007

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Wendl MC: H-index: however ranked, citations need context. Nature 449:4032007




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 399 399 19
Full Text Views 382 308 3
PDF Downloads 133 112 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0


Google Scholar