Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series

View More View Less
  • 1 Departments of Neurological Surgery,
  • 4 Otolaryngology,
  • 5 Radiology (Division of Neuroradiology), and
  • 7 Ophthalmology;
  • 2 Minimally Invasive endoNeurosurgery Center; and
  • 3 Center for Cranial Base Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
  • 6 Department of Radiology, Christiana Hospital, Newark, Delaware
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00
Print or Print + Online

Object

Craniopharyngiomas are challenging tumors that most frequently occur in the sellar or suprasellar regions. Microscopic transsphenoidal resections with various extensions and variations have been performed with good results. The addition of the endoscope as well as the further expansion of the standard and extended transsphenoidal approaches has not been well evaluated for the treatment of this pathological entity.

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a purely endoscopic, expanded endonasal approach (EEA) for the resection of craniopharyngiomas at their institution between June 1999 and February 2006. Endocrine and ophthalmological outcomes, extent of resection, and complications were evaluated.

Results

Sixteen patients underwent endoscopic EEA for the resection of craniopharyngiomas. Five patients (31%) presented with recurrent disease. Complete resection was planned in 11 of the 16 patients. Three elderly patients with vision loss underwent planned debulking, 1 patient with vision loss and a moderate-sized tumor had express wishes for debulking, and 1 patient had a separate, third ventricular nodule that was not resected. Of those in whom complete resection was planned, 91% underwent near-total (2/11) or gross-total (8/11) resection. No patient who underwent gross-total resection suffered a recurrence. The mean follow-up period was 34 months. Of the 14 patients who presented with vision loss, 93% had improvement or complete recovery and 1 patient's condition remained stable. No patient experienced visual worsening. Eighteen percent of patients (without preexisting hypopituitarism) developed panhypopituitarism and 8% developed permanent diabetes insipidus. There were no cases of new obesity. The postoperative cere-brospinal fluid leak rate was 58%. All leaks were resolved, and there were no cases of bacterial meningitis. There was 1 vascular injury (posterior cerebral artery perforator branch) resulting in the only new neurological deficit. No patient died.

Conclusions

Endoscopic EEA for the resection of craniopharyngiomas provides acceptable results and holds the potential to improve outcomes.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; DI = diabetes insipidus; EEA = expanded endonasal approach; GH = growth hormone; GKS = Gamma Knife surgery; ICP = intracranial pressure; PCA = posterior cerebral artery; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone; VP = ventriculoperitoneal.

JNS + Pediatrics - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $505.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

Contributor Notes

Address correspondence to: Amin Kassam, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, Suite B-400, Presbyterian University Hospital, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213. email: kassamab@upmc.edu.
  • 1

    Chakrabarti I, , Amar AP, , Couldwell W, & Weiss MH: Long-term neurological, visual, and endocrine outcomes following transnasal resection of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 102:650657, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Couldwell WT, , Weiss MH, , Rabb C, , Liu JK, , Apfelbaum RI, & Fukushima T: Variations on the standard transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region, with emphasis on the extended approaches and parasellar approaches: surgical experience in 105 cases. Neurosurgery 55:539547, 2004

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    De Vile CJ, , Grant DB, , Kendall BE, , Neville BG, , Stanhope R, & Watkins KE, : Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted?. J Neurosurg 85:7381, 1996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Dhellemmes P, & Vinchon M: Radical resection for craniopharyngiomas in children: surgical technique and clinical results. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 19:1 Suppl 329335, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Duff JM, , Meyer FB, , Ilstrup DM, , Laws ER, , Schleck CD, & Scheithauer BW: Long-term outcomes for surgically resected craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 46:291302, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Fahlbusch R, , Honegger J, , Paulus W, , Huk W, & Buchfelder M: Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg 90:237250, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Frank G, , Pasquini E, , Doglietto F, , Mazzatenta D, , Sciarretta V, & Farneti G, : The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59:1 Suppl ONS75ONS83, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Gupta DK, , Ojha BK, , Sarkar C, , Mahapatra AK, , Sharma BS, & Mehta VS: Recurrence in pediatric craniopharyngiomas: analysis of clinical and histological features. Childs Nerv Syst 22:5055, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Hadad G, , Bassagasteguy L, , Carrau RL, , Mataza JC, , Kassam A, & Snyderman CH, : A novel reconstructive technique following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:18811885, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Halves E, & Bushe KA: Transsphenoidal operation on craniopharyngiomas with extrasellar extensions. The advantage of the operating endoscope. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 28:362, 1979

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Han PP, , Ponce FA, & Spetzler RF: Intention-to-treat analysis of Spetzler-Martin grades IV and V arteriovenous malformations: natural history and treatment paradigm. J Neurosurg 98:37, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Hoffman HJ, , DeSilva M, , Humphreys RP, , Drake JM, , Smith ML, & Blaser SI: Aggressive management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 76:4752, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Honegger J, , Buchfelder M, & Fahlbusch R: Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: endocrinological results. J Neurosurg 90:251257, 1999

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Honegger J, , Buchfelder M, , Fahlbusch R, , Daubler B, & Dorr HG: Transsphenoidal microsurgery for craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol 37:189196, 1992

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Im SH, , Wang KC, , Kim SK, , Chung YN, , Kim HS, & Lee CH, : Transsphenoidal microsurgery for pediatric craniopharyngioma: special considerations regarding indications and method. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:97103, 2003

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Isaac MA, , Hahn SS, , Kim JA, , Bogart JA, & Chung CT: Management of craniopharyngioma. Cancer J 7:516520, 2001

  • 17

    Kaptain GJ, , Vincent DA, , Sheehan JP, & Laws ER Jr: Transsphenoidal approaches for the extracapsular resection of midline suprasellar and anterior cranial base lesions. Neurosurgery 49:94100, 2001

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Kassam AB, , Carrau RL, , Snyderman CH, , Gardner P, & Mintz A: Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus 19:1 E8, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Kassam AB, , Gardner PA, , Snyderman CH, , Carrau RL, , Mintz AH, & Prevedello DM: Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 108:715728, 2008

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Kouri JG, , Chen MY, , Watson JC, & Oldfield EH: Resection of suprasellar tumors by using a modified transsphenoidal approach. Report of four cases. J Neurosurg 92:10281035, 2000

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Laws ER Jr: Comment on: Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: an evaluation of the transsphenoidal and pterional approaches. Neurosurgery 36:724, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Laws ER Jr: Transsphenoidal microsurgery in the management of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 52:661666, 1980

  • 23

    Laws ER Jr: Transsphenoidal removal of craniopharyngioma. Pediatr Neurosurg 21:5763, 1994

  • 24

    Maira G, , Anile C, , Rossi GF, & Colosimo C: Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: an evaluation of the transsphenoidal and pterional approaches. Neurosurgery 36:715724, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Mason RB, , Nieman LK, , Doppman JL, & Oldfield EH: Selective excision of adenomas originating in or extending into the pituitary stalk with preservation of function. J Neurosurg 87:343351, 1997

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Matson DD, & Crigler JF Jr: Radical treatment of craniopharyngioma. Ann Surg 152:699704, 1960

  • 27

    McMurry FG, , Hardy RW, , Dohn DF, , Sadar E, & Gardner J: Long term results in the management of craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 1:238241, 1977

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Minamida Y, , Mikami T, , Hashi K, & Houkin K: Surgical management of the recurrence and regrowth of craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 103:224232, 2005

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29

    Norris JS, , Pavaresh M, & Afshar F: Primary transsphenoidal micro-surgery in the treatment of craniopharyngiomas. Br J Neurosurg 12:305312, 1998

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Patterson RH: Comment on: Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: an evaluation of the transsphenoidal and pterional approaches. Neurosurgery 36:724, 1995

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31

    Shirane R, , Su C, , Kusaka Y, , Jokura H, & Yoshimoto T: Surgical outcomes in 31 patients with craniopharyngiomas extending outside the suprasellar cistern: an evaluation of the frontobasal approach. J Neurosurg 96:704712, 2002

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32

    Symon L: An approach to radical excision of craniopharyngioma by the temporal route. Pediatr Neurosurg 21:1 Suppl 6468, 1994

  • 33

    Tena-Suck ML, , Salinas-Lara C, , Arce-Arellano RI, , Rembao-Bo-jórquez D, , Morales-Espinosa D, & Sotelo J, : Clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics associated to recurrence/regrowth of craniopharyngiomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108:661669, 2006

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34

    Van Effenterre R, & Boch AL: Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 97:311, 2002

  • 35

    Weiner HL, , Wisoff JH, , Rosenberg ME, , Kupersmith MJ, , Cohen H, & Zagzag D, : Craniopharyngiomas: a clinicopathological analysis of factors predictive of recurrence and functional outcome. Neurosurgery 35:10011011, 1994

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36

    Yaşargil MG, , Circic M, , Kis M, , Siegenthaler G, , Teddy PJ, & Roth P: Total removal of craniopharyngiomas: approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 73:311, 1990

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 619 147 10
Full Text Views 283 38 4
PDF Downloads 127 21 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0