Combination of sacral-alar-iliac screw and cortical bone trajectory screw techniques for lumbosacral fixation: technical note

Restricted access

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $369.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $600.00

OBJECTIVE

Lumbosacral fixation plays an important role in the management of devastating spinal pathologies, including osteoporosis, fracture, infection, tumor resection, and spinal deformities, which require long-segment fusion constructs to the sacrum. The sacral-alar-iliac (SAI) screw technique has been developed as a promising solution to facilitate both minimal invasiveness and strong fixation. The rationale for SAI screw insertion is a medialized entry point away from the ilium and in line with cranial screws. The divergent screw path of the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) provides a higher amount of cortical bone purchase and strong screw fixation and has the potential to harmoniously align with SAI screws due to its medial starting point. However, there has been no report on the combination of these two techniques. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of this combination technique.

METHODS

The subjects consisted of 17 consecutive patients with a mean age of 74.2 ± 4.7 years who underwent posterior lumbosacral fixation for degenerative spinal pathologies using the combination of SAI and CBT fixation techniques. There were 8 patients with degenerative scoliosis, 7 with degenerative kyphosis, 1 with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture at L5, and 1 with vertebral metastasis at L5. Fusion zones included T10–sacrum in 13 patients, L2–sacrum in 2, and L4–sacrum in 2.

RESULTS

No patients required complicated rod bending or the use of a connector for rod assembly in the lumbosacral region. Postoperative CT performed within a week after surgery showed that all lumbosacral screws were in correct positions and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The lumbosacral bone fusion was confirmed in 81.8% of patients at 1-year follow-up based on fine-cut CT scanning. No patient showed a significant loss of spinal alignment or rod fracture in the lumbosacral transitional region.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first paper on the feasibility of a combination technique using SAI and CBT screws. This technique could be a valid option for lumbosacral fixation due to the ease of rod placement with potential reductions in operative time and blood loss.

ABBREVIATIONS CBT = cortical bone trajectory; C7SVA = C7 sagittal vertical axis; LL = lumbar lordosis; PI = pelvic incidence; PT = pelvic tilt; SAI = sacral-alar-iliac; SI = sacroiliac.
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Keitaro Matsukawa: National Hospital Organization, Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. keitaro197897@hotmail.com.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online March 20, 2020; DOI: 10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191420.Disclosures Dr. Mobbs: direct stock ownership in Medtronic, and royalties from Stryker and A-Spine ASIA.
Headings
References
  • 1

    Kim YJBridwell KHLenke LG Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(20):23292336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 2

    Schwab FJBlondel BBess S Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(13):E803E812.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 3

    Chang TLSponseller PDKebaish KMFishman EK. Low profile pelvic fixation: anatomic parameters for sacral alar-iliac fixation versus traditional iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(5):436440.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Sponseller PDZimmerman RMKo PS Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(20):18871892.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    McCord DHCunningham BWShono Y Biomechanical analysis of lumbosacral fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17(8)(suppl):S235S243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Tavares Junior MCMde Souza JPVAraujo TPF Comparative tomographic study of the S2-alar-iliac screw versus the iliac screw. Eur Spine J. 2019;28(4):855862.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Cunningham BWSponseller PDMurgatroyd AA A comprehensive biomechanical analysis of sacral alar iliac fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(3):367375.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    OʼBrien JRYu WKaufman BE Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(20):E1250E1255.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Elder BDIshida WLo SL Use of S2-alar-iliac screws associated with less complications than iliac screws in adult lumbosacropelvic fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(3):E142E149.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Ilyas HPlace HPuryear A. A comparison of early clinical and radiographic complications of iliac screw fixation versus S2 alar iliac (S2AI) fixation in the adult and pediatric populations. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(4):E199E205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Mobbs RJ. The “medio-latero-superior trajectory technique”: an alternative cortical trajectory for pedicle fixation. Orthop Surg. 2013;5(1):5659.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Santoni BGHynes RAMcGilvray KC Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2009;9(5):366373.

  • 13

    Baluch DAPatel AALullo B Effect of physiological loads on cortical and traditional pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(22):E1297E1302.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Hung CWWu MFHong RT Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;145:4145.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    Khanna NDeol GPoulter GAhuja A. Medialized, muscle-splitting approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: technique and multicenter perioperative results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(suppl 8):S90S96.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Matsukawa KKato TYato Y Incidence and risk factors of adjacent cranial facet violation following pedicle screw insertion using cortical bone trajectory technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(14):E851E856.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 17

    Lee GWSon JHAhn MW The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Spine J. 2015;15(7):15191526.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18

    Sakaura HMiwa TYamashita T Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25(5):591595.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19

    Takenaka SMukai YTateishi K Clinical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of cortical bone trajectory and conventional pedicle screw insertion. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(10):E1411E1418.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    Matsukawa KYato YNemoto O Morphometric measurement of cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw insertion using computed tomography. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(6):E248E253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21

    Matsukawa KYato YHynes RA Cortical bone trajectory for thoracic pedicle screws: a technical note. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(5):E497E504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22

    Xuan JZhang DJin HM Minimally invasive cortical bone trajectory screws placement via pedicle or pedicle rib unit in the lower thoracic spine: a cadaveric and radiographic study. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(12):41994207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Matsukawa KYato YKato T Cortical bone trajectory for lumbosacral fixation: penetrating S-1 endplate screw technique: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(2):203209.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Viswanathan VKGanguly RMinnema AJ Biomechanical assessment of proximal junctional semi-rigid fixation in long-segment thoracolumbar constructs. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30(2):184192.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25

    Ito ZMatsuyama YSakai Y Bone union rate with autologous iliac bone versus local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(21):E1101E1105.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26

    Mattei TAFassett DR. Combined S-1 and S-2 sacral alar-iliac screws as a salvage technique for pelvic fixation after pseudarthrosis and lumbosacropelvic instability: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(3):321330.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 27

    Yamada KHigashi TKaneko K Optimal trajectory and insertion accuracy of sacral alar iliac screws. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(4):313318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Lindsey CDeviren VXu Z The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine. 2006;31(15):16801687.

  • 29

    Bederman SSHahn PColin V Robotic guidance for S2-alar-iliac screws in spinal deformity correction. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(1):E49E53.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30

    Matsukawa KKaito TAbe Y. Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific template guide system [published online July 3, 2019]. Neurosurg Rev. doi:10.1007/s10143-019-01140-1

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1833 1833 1833
Full Text Views 96 96 96
PDF Downloads 82 82 82
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar