Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic discectomy (ED) has been advocated as a less-invasive alternative to open microdiscectomy (OM) and tubular microdiscectomy (TM) for lumbar disc herniations, with the potential to decrease postoperative pain and shorten recovery times. Large-scale, objective comparisons of outcomes between ED, OM, and TM, however, are lacking. The authors’ objective in this study was to conduct a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of ED, OM, and TM.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for articles published as of February 1, 2019, for comparative studies reporting outcomes of some combination of ED, OM, and TM. A meta-analysis of outcome parameters was performed assuming random effects.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies describing the outcomes of 2577 patients were included. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher with OM than with both TM (p = 0.01) and ED (p < 0.00001). Length of stay was significantly longer with OM than with ED (p < 0.00001). Return to work time was significantly longer in OM than with ED (p = 0.001). Postoperative leg (p = 0.02) and back (p = 0.01) VAS scores, and Oswestry Disability Index scores (p = 0.006) at latest follow-up were significantly higher for OM than for ED. Serum creatine phosphokinase (p = 0.02) and C-reactive protein (p < 0.00001) levels on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher with OM than with ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of TM and OM for lumbar disc herniations are largely equivalent. While this analysis demonstrated that several clinical variables were significantly improved in patients undergoing ED when compared with OM, the magnitude of many of these differences was small and of uncertain clinical relevance, and several of the included studies were retrospective and subject to a high risk of bias. Further high-quality prospective studies are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparative efficacy of the various surgical treatments for lumbar disc herniations.

ABBREVIATIONS CPK = creatine phosphokinase; CRP = C-reactive protein; ED = endoscopic microdiscectomy; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; OM = open microdiscectomy; TM = tubular microdiscectomy; VAS = visual analog scale.

Supplementary Materials

  • Supplemental Table 1 (PDF 454 KB)
Article Information

Contributor Notes

Correspondence Albert Telfeian: The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. atelfeian@lifespan.org.INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online September 6, 2019; DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19532.Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings
TrendMD
Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1291 1291 535
Full Text Views 146 146 57
PDF Downloads 95 95 41
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0
PubMed
Google Scholar