Surgical decompression is the recommended treatment in patients with moderate to severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in whom symptoms do not respond to conservative therapy. Multilevel disease, poor patient health, and advanced age are generally considered predictors of a poor outcome after surgery, essentially because of a surgical technique that has always been considered invasive and prone to causing postoperative instability. The authors present a minimally invasive surgical technique performed using a unilateral approach for lumbar decompression.
A retrospective study was conducted of data obtained in a consecutive series of 473 patients treated with unilateral microdecompression for DLSS over a 5-year period (2000–2004). Clinical outcome was measured using the Prolo Economic and Functional Scale and the visual analog scale (VAS). Radiological follow-up included dynamic x-ray films of the lumbar spine and, in some cases, computed tomography scans.
Follow-up was completed in 374 (79.1%) of 473 patients—183 men and 191 women. A total of 520 levels were decompressed: 285 patients (76.2%) presented with single-level stenosis, 86 (22.9%) with two-level stenosis, and three (0.9%) with three-level stenosis.
Three hundred twenty-nine patients (87.9%) experienced a clinical benefit, which was defined as neurological improvement in VAS and Prolo Scale scores. Only three patients (0.8%) reported suffering segmental instability at a treated level, but none required surgical stabilization, and all were successfully treated conservatively.
Evaluation of the results indicates that unilateral microdecompression of the lumbar spine offers a significant improvement for patients with DLSS, with a lower rate of complications.
Abbreviations used in this paper:AP = anteroposterior; CT = computed tomography; DLSS = degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis; LF = ligamentum flavum; VAS = visual analog scale.
diPierroCGHelmGAShaffreyCIChadduckJBHensonSLMalikJM: Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by extensive unilateral decompression and contralateral autologous bone fusion: operative technique and results. J Neurosurg84:166–1731996
FoxMWOnofrioBMOnofrioBMHanssenAD: Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg85:793–8021996
GunzburgRKellerTSSzpalskiMVandeputteKSprattKF: Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J12:197–2042003
KatzJNLipsonSJLewRAGroblerLJWeinsteinJNBrickGW: Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine22:1123–11311997
MaricondaMFavaRGattoALongoCMilanoC: Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients. J Spinal Disord Tech15:39–462002
ResnickDKChoudhriTFDaileyATGroffMWKhooLMatzPG: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine2:679–6852005
ResnickDKChoudhriTFDaileyATGroffMWKhooLMatzPG: Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine2:686–6912005
SpetzgerUBertalanffyHNaujokatCvon KeyserlingkDGGilsbachJM: Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: anatomical and surgical considerations. Acta Neurochir (Wien)139:392–3961997
ThomasNWReaGLPikulBKMervisLJIrsikRMcGregorJM: Quantitative outcome and radiographic comparisons between laminectomy and laminotomy in the treatment of acquired lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery41:567–5751997
ThoméCZevgaridisDLehetaOBäznerHPockler-SchönigerCWöhrleJ: Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine3:129–1412005
YamazakiKYoshidaSItoTTobaTKatoSShimamuraT: Postoperative outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after fenestration: correlation with changes in intradural and extradural tube on magnetic resonance imaging. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)10:136–1432002