Intravertebral augmentation (IVA) is a reliable minimally invasive technique for treating Magerl type A vertebral body fractures. However, poor correction of kyphotic angulation, the risk of cement leakage, and significant exposure to radiation (for the surgeon, the operating room staff, and the patient) remain significant issues. The authors conducted a study to assess the value of robot-assisted IVA (RA-IVA) for thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures.
The authors performed a retrospective, single-center study of patients who had undergone RA-IVA or conventional fluoroscopy-guided IVA (F-IVA) for thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures. Installation and operating times, guidance accuracy, residual local kyphosis, degree of restoration of vertebral body height, incidence of cement leakage, rate of morbidity, length of hospital stay, and radiation-related data were recorded.
Data obtained in 30 patients who underwent RA-IVA were compared with those obtained in 30 patients who underwent F-IVA during the same period (the surgical indications were identical, but the surgeons were different). The mean ± SD installation time in the RA-IVA group (24 ± 7.5 minutes) was significantly shorter (p = 0.005) than that in the F-IVA group (26 ± 8 minutes). The mean operating time for the RA-IVA group (52 ± 11 minutes) was significantly longer (p = 0.026) than that for the F-IVA group (30 ± 11 minutes). All RA-IVAs and F-IVAs were Ravi’s scale grade A (no pedicle breach). The mean degree of residual local kyphosis (4.7° ± 3.15°) and the percentage of vertebral body height restoration (63.6% ± 21.4%) were significantly better after RA-IVA than after F-IVA (8.4° ± 5.4° and 30% ± 34%, respectively). The incidence of cement leakage was significantly lower in the RA-IVA group (p < 0.05). The mean length of hospital stay after surgery was 3.2 days for both groups. No surgery-related complications occurred in either group. With RA-IVA, the mean radiation exposure was 438 ± 147 mGy × cm for the patient and 30 ± 17 mGy for the surgeon.
RA-IVA provided better vertebral body fracture correction than the conventional F-IVA. However, RA-IVA requires more time than F-IVA.
ABBREVIATIONSF-IVA = fluoroscopy-guided intravertebral augmentation; fpCT = flat-panel CT; IVA = intravertebral augmentation; LOS = length of hospital stay; NS = not significant; PMMA = polymethylmethacrylate; RA-IVA = robot-assisted IVA; VAS = visual analog scale.
CapelCFichtenANicotBLefrancMToussaintPDesenclosC: Should we fear cement leakage during kyphoplasty in percutaneous traumatic spine surgery? A single experience with 76 consecutive cases. Neurochirurgie60:293–2982014
CheninLCapelCFichtenAPeltierJLefrancM: Evaluation of screw placement accuracy in circumferential lumbar arthrodesis using robotic assistance and intraoperative flat-panel computed tomography. World Neurosurg105:86–942017
GelalisIDPaschosNKPakosEEPolitisANArnaoutoglouCMKarageorgosAC: Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J21:247–2552012
KrügerAOberkircherLFigielJFloßdorfFBolzingerFNoriegaDC: Height restoration of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures using different intravertebral reduction devices: a cadaveric study. Spine J15:1092–10982015
NoriegaDCRamajoRHLiteISToribioBCorrederaRArduraF: Safety and clinical performance of kyphoplasty and SpineJack® procedures in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a pilot, monocentric, investigator-initiated study. Osteoporos Int27:2047–20552016
NussbaumDAGailloudPMurphyK: A review of complications associated with vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty as reported to the Food and Drug Administration medical device related web site. J Vasc Interv Radiol15:1185–11922004
RiisJLehmanRRPereraRAQuinnJRRinehartPTutenHR: A retrospective comparison of intraoperative CT and fluoroscopy evaluating radiation exposure in posterior spinal fusions for scoliosis. Patient Saf Surg11:322017
RotterRSchmittLGiererPSchmitzKPNoriegaDMittlmeierT: Minimum cement volume required in vertebral body augmentation—a biomechanical study comparing the permanent SpineJack device and balloon kyphoplasty in traumatic fracture. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon)30:720–7252015
SrinivasanDThanKDWangACLa MarcaFWangPISchermerhornTC: Radiation safety and spine surgery: systematic review of exposure limits and methods to minimize radiation exposure. World Neurosurg82:1337–13432014
WalterJHaciyakupogluEWaschkeAKalffREwaldC: Cement leakage as a possible complication of balloon kyphoplasty—is there a difference between osteoporotic compression fractures (AO type A1) and incomplete burst fractures (AO type A3.1)?Acta Neurochir (Wien)154:313–3192012