Iliac screw versus S2 alar-iliac screw fixation in adults: a meta-analysis

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

In a meta-analysis, the authors sought to compare outcomes after iliac screw (IS) versus S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation in adult patients.

METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE database search was performed for studies comparing IS and S2AI screw fixation techniques in adults. Levels of evidence were assigned based on the North American Spine Society guidelines. Three outcomes were examined: 1) revision surgery rate secondary to mechanical failure or wound complications, 2) surgical site infection rate, and 3) screw prominence/pain. Data were pooled and outcomes compared between techniques. Absolute risk reductions (ARRs) were also calculated for outcome measures.

RESULTS

Five retrospective cohort studies (all level III evidence) were included in our analysis. A total of 323 adult patients were included—147 in the IS group (45.5%) and 176 in the S2AI group (54.5%). Overall, revision surgery due to mechanical failure or wound complications was needed in 66 of 323 patients (revision surgery rate 20.4%)—27.9% in the IS group and 14.2% in the S2AI group (13.7% ARR; p < 0.001). Four studies reported wound infections among 278 total patients, with an infection rate of 12.6% (35/278)—25.4% in the IS group and 2.6% in the S2AI group (22.8% ARR; p < 0.001). Three studies examined development of screw prominence/pain; combined, these studies reported screw prominence/pain in 21 of 215 cases (9.8%)—18.1% in the IS group and 1.8% in the S2AI group (16.3% ARR; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

S2AI screw fixation in adults has a significantly lower mechanical failure and complication rate than IS fixation based on the current best available evidence.

ABBREVIATIONS ARR = absolute risk reduction; IS = iliac screw; NASS = North American Spine Society; S2AI = S2 alar-iliac.

Article Information

Correspondence Reza Yassari: Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY. ryassari@montefiore.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 9, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18710.

Disclosures Daniel M. Sciubba has consulting agreements with DePuy Synthes, Medtronic, Stryker, NuVasive, K2M, and Baxter. Reza Yassari has a consulting agreement with Stryker.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Flowchart of literature search and study selection. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Risk of bias in individual studies. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Forest plot showing rates of revision surgery across studies. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of reoperation in patients receiving S2AI screws (p < 0.001). Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Forest plot showing rates of wound infection across studies. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of infection in patients receiving S2AI screws (p < 0.0001). Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    Forest plot showing rates of screw prominence/pain across studies. The meta-analysis revealed a significantly lower risk of screw prominence/pain in patients receiving S2AI screws (p = 0.006). Figure is available in color online only.

References

1

Alanay AVyas RShamie ANSciocia TRandolph GWang JC: Safety and efficacy of implant removal for patients with recurrent back pain after a failed degenerative lumbar spine surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:2712772007

2

Burns CBDua KTrasolini NAKomatsu DEBarsi JM: Biomechanical comparison of spinopelvic fixation constructs: iliac screw versus S2-alar-iliac screw. Spine Deform 4:10152016

3

Cook SAsher MLai SMShobe J: Reoperation after primary posterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Toward defining late operative site pain of unknown cause. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:4634682000

4

Deckey JECourt CBradford DS: Loss of sagittal plane correction after removal of spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:245324602000

5

Elder BDIshida WLo SLHolmes CGoodwin CRKosztowski TA: Use of S2-alar-iliac screws associated with less complications than iliac screws in adult lumbosacropelvic fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E142E1492017

6

Gödde SFritsch EDienst MKohn D: Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:169316992003

7

Guler UOCetin EYaman OPellise FCasademut AVSabat MD: Sacropelvic fixation in adult spinal deformity (ASD); a very high rate of mechanical failure. Eur Spine J 24:108510912015

8

Ilyas HPlace HPuryear A: A comparison of early clinical and radiographic complications of iliac screw fixation versus S2 alar iliac (S2AI) fixation in the adult and pediatric populations. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:E199E2052015

9

Ishida WElder BDHolmes CLo SLGoodwin CRKosztowski TA: Comparison between S2-alar-iliac screw fixation and iliac screw fixation in adult deformity surgery: reoperation rates and spinopelvic parameters. Global Spine J 7:6726802017

10

Kebaish KM: Sacropelvic fixation: techniques and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:224522512010

11

Lee NJShin JIKothari PKim JSLeven DMSteinberger J: Incidence, impact, and risk factors for 30-day wound complications following elective adult spinal deformity surgery. Global Spine J 7:4174242017

12

Malham GMEllis NJParker RMBlecher CMWhite RGoss B: Maintenance of segmental lordosis and disk height in stand-alone and instrumented extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF). Clin Spine Surg 30:E90E982017

13

Mazur MDRavindra VMSchmidt MHBrodke DSLawrence BDRiva-Cambrin J: Unplanned reoperation after lumbopelvic fixation with S-2 alar-iliac screws or iliac bolts. J Neurosurg Spine 23:67762015

14

Moshirfar ARand FFSponseller PDParazin SJKhanna AJKebaish KM: Pelvic fixation in spine surgery. Historical overview, indications, biomechanical relevance, and current techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (Suppl 2):891062005

15

O’Brien JRYu WKaufman BEBucklen BSalloum KKhalil S: Biomechanical evaluation of S2 alar-iliac screws: effect of length and quad-cortical purchase as compared with iliac fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1250E12552013

16

Ozgur BMAryan HEPimenta LTaylor WR: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:4354432006

17

Passias PGPoorman GWJalai CMNeuman Bde la Garza-Ramos RMiller E: Morbidity of adult spinal deformity surgery in elderly has declined over time. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:E978E9822017

18

Schwend RMSluyters RNajdzionek J: The pylon concept of pelvic anchorage for spinal instrumentation in the human cadaver. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:5425472003

19

Sponseller PDZimmerman RMKo PSPull Ter Gunne AFMohamed ASChang TL: Low profile pelvic fixation with the sacral alar iliac technique in the pediatric population improves results at two-year minimum follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:188718922010

20

Stavridis SIBücking PSchaeren SJeanneret BSchnake KJ: Implant removal after posterior stabilization of the thoraco-lumbar spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:1191232010

21

Theologis AADemirkiran GCallahan MPekmezci MAmes CDeviren V: Local intrawound vancomycin powder decreases the risk of surgical site infections in complex adult deformity reconstruction: a cost analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:187518802014

22

Yu YHLu MLTseng ICSu CYHsu YHYeh WL: Effect of the subcutaneous route for iliac screw insertion in lumbopelvic fixation for vertical unstable sacral fractures on the infection rate: A retrospective case series. Injury 47:221222172016

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 110 110 110
Full Text Views 39 39 39
PDF Downloads 45 45 45
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar