Updated imaging does not affect revision rates in adults undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degenerative disease

Restricted access


Diagnostic workup for lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) includes imaging such as radiography, MRI, and/or CT myelography. If a patient has unsuccessful nonoperative treatment, the surgeon must then decide if obtaining updated images prior to surgery is warranted. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the timing of preoperative neuroimaging altered clinical outcome, as reflected by the subsequent rate of revision surgery, in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal pathology.


From the Health Care Service Corporation administrative claims database, adult patients (minimum age 55 years old) with lumbar DDD who underwent surgery including posterior lumbar decompression with and without fusion (1–2 levels) and at least 5 years of continuous coverage after the index surgery were identified. The chi-square test was used to determine differences in revision rates stratified by timing of each imaging procedure relative to the index procedure (< 6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, or > 24 months).


Of 28,676 cases identified, 5128 (18%) had revision surgery within 5 years. The timing of preoperative MRI or plain radiography was not associated with revision surgery. Among the entire cohort, there was a lower incidence of revision surgery in patients who had a CT myelogram within 1 year prior to the index surgery (p = 0.017). This observation was strongest in patients undergoing decompression only (p = 0.002), but not significant in patients undergoing fusion (p = 0.845).


Routine reimaging prior to surgery, simply because the existing MRI is 6–12 months old, may not be beneficial, at least as reflected in subsequent revision rates. The study also suggests that there may be a subset of patients for whom preoperative CT myelography reduces revision rates. This topic has important financial implications and deserves further study in a more granular data set.

ABBREVIATIONS CPT = Current Procedural Terminology; DDD = degenerative disc disease; HCSC = Health Care Service Corporation.

Article Information

Correspondence Leah Y. Carreon: Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY. leah.carreon@nortonhealthcare.org.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 16, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE18586.

Disclosures Dr. Glassman reports being an employee of Norton Healthcare; being a consultant for and receiving royalties from Medtronic; and being Past President of the Scoliosis Research Society. Dr. Carreon reports being an employee of Norton Healthcare; being a consultant for AOSpine; receiving funds for travel from the University of Southern Denmark and University of Louisville; being a member of the Editorial Advisory Board for Spine Deformity, The Spine Journal, and Spine; being a member of the University of Louisville IRB; and being a member of the Research Committee for the Scoliosis Research Society.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.




Bendo JAOng B: Importance of correlating static and dynamic imaging studies in diagnosing degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Am J Orthop 30:2472502001


Bunch JTGlassman SDUnderwood HRMetcalfe LNOndra SVasilyev I: Preoperative full-length standing radiographs and revision rates in lumbar degenerative scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 28:5815852018


Covaro AVilà-Canet Gde Frutos AGUbierna MTCiccolo FCaceres E: Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: an evidence-based review. EFORT Open Rev 1:2672742017


Deyo RAMartin BIKreuter WJarvik JGAngier HMirza SK: Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1979–19862011


Gerling MCLeven DPassias PGLafage VBianco KLee A: Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42:155915692017


Gerling MCLeven DPassias PGLafage VBianco KLee A: Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for lumbar stenosis: a subanalysis of the 8-year data from the SPORT trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:9019092016


Issack PSCunningham MEPumberger MHughes APCammisa FP Jr: Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:5275352012


Kim CHChung CKPark CSChoi BHahn SKim MJ: Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study. Spine J 13:123012372013


Kim CHChung CKPark CSChoi BKim MJPark BJ: Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease: nationwide cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:5815902013


Leven DPassias PGErrico TJLafage VBianco KLee A: Risk factors for reoperation in patients treated surgically for intervertebral disc herniation: a subanalysis of eight-year SPORT data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:131613252015


Lowe RWHayes TDKaye JBagg RJLuekens CA: Standing roentgenograms in spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (117):80841976


Madigan LVaccaro ARSpector LRMilam RA: Management of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disk disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:1021112009


Malter ADMcNeney BLoeser JDDeyo RA: 5-year reoperation rates after different types of lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:8148201998


Martin BIMirza SKComstock BAGray DTKreuter WDeyo RA: Reoperation rates following lumbar spine surgery and the influence of spinal fusion procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:3823872007


Merkle MMaier GDanz SKaminsky JTatagiba MSHebela NM: The value of dynamic radiographic myelography in addition to magnetic resonance imaging in detection lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 143:482016


Sato SYagi MMachida MYasuda AKonomi TMiyake A: Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine J 15:153615442015


Segebarth BKurd MFHaug PHDavis R: Routine upright imaging for evaluating degenerative lumbar stenosis: incidence of degenerative spondylolisthesis missed on supine MRI. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:3943972015




All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 86 86 86
Full Text Views 27 27 27
PDF Downloads 25 25 25
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0


Google Scholar