Association between payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with decompression surgery

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

Insurance disparities can have relevant effects on outcomes after elective lumbar spinal surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between private/public payer status and patient-reported outcomes in adult patients who underwent decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

A sample of 100 patients who underwent surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis from 2012 to 2014 was evaluated as part of the prospectively collected Quality Outcomes Database at a single institution. Outcome measures were evaluated at 3 months and 12 months, analyzed in regard to payer status (private insurance vs Medicare/Veterans Affairs insurance), and adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

At baseline, patients had similar visual analog scale back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and EQ-5D scores. At 3 months postintervention, patients with government-funded insurance reported significantly worse quality of life (mean difference 0.11, p < 0.001) and more leg pain (mean difference 1.26, p = 0.05). At 12 months, patients with government-funded insurance reported significantly worse quality of life (mean difference 0.14, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences at 3 months or 12 months between groups for back pain (p = 0.14 and 0.43) or disability (p = 0.19 and 0.15). Across time points, patients in both groups showed improvement at 3 months and 12 months in all 4 functional outcomes compared with baseline (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Both private and public insurance patients had significant improvement after elective lumbar spinal surgery. Patients with public insurance had slightly less improvement in quality of life after surgery than those with private insurance but still benefited greatly from surgical intervention, particularly with respect to functional status.

ABBREVIATIONS ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PRO = patient-reported outcome; QOD = Quality Outcomes Database; VA = Veterans Affairs; VAS = visual analog scale.

Article Information

Correspondence Matthew S. Erwood: University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL. merwood@uabmc.edu.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 2, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.SPINE18294.

Disclosures The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

References

1

Aalto TJMalmivaara AKovacs FHerno AAlen MSalmi L: Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:E648E6632006

2

Aleem ISRampersaud YR: Elderly patients have similar outcomes compared to younger patients after minimally invasive surgery for spinal stenosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:182418302014

3

Asher ALMcCormick PCSelden NRGhogawala ZMcGirt MJ: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database and NeuroPoint Alliance: rationale, development, and implementation. Neurosurg Focus 34(1):E22013

4

Asher ALSperoff TDittus RSParker SLDavies JMSelden N: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): a collaborative North American outcomes registry to advance value-based spine care. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39 (22 Suppl 1):S106S1162014

5

Athiviraham AWali ZAYen D: Predictive factors influencing clinical outcome with operative management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J 11:6136172011

6

Bernatz JTAnderson PA: Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus 39(4):E72015

7

Best MJBuller LTEismont FJ: National trends in ambulatory surgery for intervertebral disc disorders and spinal stenosis: a 12-year analysis of the national surveys of ambulatory surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:170317112015

8

Chotai SSivaganesan AParker SLMcGirt MJDevin CJ: Patient-specific factors associated with dissatisfaction after elective surgery for degenerative spine diseases. Neurosurgery 77:1571632015

9

Copay AGGlassman SDSubach BRBerven SSchuler TCCarreon LY: Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J 8:9689742008

10

Deyo RAMirza SKMartin BIKreuter WGoodman DCJarvik JG: Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA 303:125912652010

11

Elsayed GDavis MCDupépé ECMcClugage SGSzerlip PWalters BC: Obese (BMI >30) patients have greater functional improvement and reach equivalent outcomes at 12 months following decompression surgery for symptomatic lumbar stenosis. World Neurosurg 105:8848942017

12

Gautschi OPSmoll NRJoswig HCorniola MVSchaller KHildebrandt G: Influence of age on pain intensity, functional impairment and health-related quality of life before and after surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 150:33392016

13

Gazmararian JABaker DWWilliams MVParker RMScott TLGreen DC: Health literacy among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. JAMA 281:5455511999

14

Gregebo BDai DSchillberg BBaehr MNyström BTaube A: Private and non-private disc herniation patients: do they differ? Open Orthop J 8:2372412014

15

Grotle MSolberg TStorheim KLærum EZwart JA: Public and private health service in Norway: a comparison of patient characteristics and surgery criteria for patients with nerve root affections due to discus herniation. Eur Spine J 23:198419912014

16

Harris PATaylor RThielke RPayne JGonzalez NConde JG: Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:3773812009

17

Koerner JDGlaser JRadcliff K: Which variables are associated with patient-reported outcomes after discectomy? Review of SPORT disc herniation studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:200020062015

18

Lad SPHuang KTBagley JHHazzard MABabu ROwens TR: Disparities in the outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery based on insurance status. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:111911272013

19

McGirt MJParker SLHilibrand AMummaneni PGlassman SDDevin CJ: Lumbar surgery in the elderly provides significant health benefit in the US health care system: patient-reported outcomes in 4370 patients from the N2QOD registry. Neurosurgery 77 (Suppl 4):S125S1352015

20

McGirt MJSperoff TDittus RSHarrell FE JrAsher AL: The National Neurosurgery Quality and Outcomes Database (N2QOD): general overview and pilot-year project description. Neurosurg Focus 34(1):E62013

21

Molina CAZadnik PLGokaslan ZLWitham TFBydon AWolinsky JP: A cohort cost analysis of lumbar laminectomy—current trends in surgeon and hospital fees distribution. Spine J 13:143414372013

22

Oldridge NBYuan ZStoll JERimm AR: Lumbar spine surgery and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries, 1986. Am J Public Health 84:129212981994

23

Rihn JAHilibrand ASZhao WLurie JDVaccaro ARAlbert TJ: Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis in the octogenarian population: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:1771852015

24

Shamji MFMroz THsu WChutkan N: Management of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Neurosurgery 77 (Suppl 4):S68S742015

25

Thornes EIkonomou NGrotle M: Prognosis of surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study of clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life across gender and age groups. Open Orthop J 5:3723782011

26

Vincent HKAlfano APLee LVincent KR: Sex and age effects on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:4614672006

27

Weinstein JNTosteson TDLurie JDTosteson ANABlood EHanscom B: Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:7948102008

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 115 115 115
Full Text Views 43 43 43
PDF Downloads 32 32 32
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar