Atlantoaxial instability is an important cause of pain and neurological dysfunction in patients with Down syndrome (DS), frequently requiring instrumented fusion of the upper cervical spine. This study provides a quantitative analysis of C2 morphology in DS patients compared with their peers without DS to identify differences that must be considered for the safe placement of instrumentation.
A retrospective chart review identified age-matched patients with and without DS with a CT scan of the cervical spine. Three-dimensional reconstructions of these scans were made with images along the axis of, and perpendicular to, the pars, lamina, facet, and transverse foramen of C2 bilaterally. Two of the authors performed independent measurements of anatomical structures using these images, and the average of the 2 raters’ measurements was recorded. Pedicle height and width; pars axis length (the distance from the facet to the anterior vertebral body through the pars); pars rostrocaudal angle (angle of the pars axis length to the endplate of C2); pars axial angle (angle of the pars axis length to the median coronal plane); lamina height, length, and width; lamina angle (angle of the lamina length to the median coronal plane); and transverse foramen posterior distance (the distance from the posterior wall of the transverse foramen to the tangent of the posterior vertebral body) were measured bilaterally. Patients with and without DS were compared using a mixed-effects model accounting for patient height.
A total of 18 patients with and 20 patients without DS were included in the analysis. The groups were matched based on age and sex. The median height was 147 cm (IQR 142–160 cm) in the DS group and 165 cm (IQR 161–172 cm) in the non-DS group (p < 0.001). After accounting for variations in height, the mean pars rostrocaudal angle was greater (50.86° vs 45.54°, p = 0.004), the mean transverse foramen posterior distance was less (−1.5 mm vs +1.3 mm, p = 0.001), and the mean lamina width was less (6.2 mm vs 7.7 mm, p = 0.038) in patients with DS.
Patients with DS had a steeper rostrocaudal trajectory of the pars, a more posteriorly positioned transverse foramen posterior wall, and a narrower lamina compared with age- and sex-matched peers. These variations should be considered during surgical planning, as they may have implications to safe placement of instrumentation.
ABBREVIATIONSDS = Down syndrome; ES = effect size.
Correspondence G. Alexander Jones: Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL. email@example.com.
INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online November 23, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE18750.
Disclosures Dr. Nockels: consultant for Medtronic. Dr. Jones: grant from Medtronic through Loyola University Medical Center for an unrelated research project, stock ownership in InVivo Therapeutics, and honorarium for the Chicago Review Course.
DumitrescuAVMogaDCLongmuirSQOlsonRJDrackAV: Prevalence and characteristics of abnormal head posture in children with Down syndrome: a 20-year retrospective, descriptive review. Ophthalmology118:1859–18642011
NakamuraNInabaYAotaYObaMMachidaJAidaN: New radiological parameters for the assessment of atlantoaxial instability in children with Down syndrome: the normal values and the risk of spinal cord injury. Bone Joint J98-B:1704–17102016
RasmussenSAWhiteheadNCollierSAFríasJL: Setting a public health research agenda for Down syndrome: summary of a meeting sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Down Syndrome Society. Am J Med Genet A146A:2998–30102008
SiemionowKHansdorferMJanuszPMardjetkoS: Complications in adult patients with Down syndrome undergoing cervical spine surgery using current instrumentation techniques and rhBMP-2: A long-term follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg78:113–1232017
YamazakiMOkawaAHashimotoMAibaASomeyaYKodaM: Abnormal course of the vertebral artery at the craniovertebral junction in patients with Down syndrome visualized by three-dimensional CT angiography. Neuroradiology50:485–4902008