Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?

Restricted access

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to determine if the intraoperative segmental lordosis (as calculated on a cross-table lateral radiograph following a single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [TLIF] for degenerative spondylolisthesis/low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis) is maintained at discharge and at 6 months postsurgery.

METHODS

The authors reviewed images and medical records of patients ≥ 16 years of age with a diagnosis of an isolated single-level, low-grade spondylolisthesis (degenerative or isthmic) with symptomatic spinal stenosis treated between January 2008 and April 2014. Age, sex, surgical level, surgical approach, and facetectomy (unilateral vs bilateral) were recorded. Upright standardized preoperative, early, and 6-month postoperative radiographs, as well as intraoperative lateral radiographs, were analyzed for the pelvic incidence, segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL) at the TILF level, and total LL (TLL). In addition, the anteroposterior position of the cage in the disc space was documented. Data are presented as the mean ± SD; a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were included in the study. The mean age of patients was 56.8 ± 13.7 years, and 46 patients (55%) were men. The mean pelvic incidence was 59.7° ± 11.9°, and a posterior midline approach was used in 47 cases (56%). All TLIF procedures were single level using a bullet-shaped cage. A bilateral facetectomy was performed in 17 patients (20.2%), and 89.3% of procedures were done at the L4–5 and L5–S1 segments. SLL significantly improved intraoperatively from 15.8° ± 7.5° to 20.9° ± 7.7°, but the correction was lost after ambulation. Compared with preoperative values, at 6 months the change in SLL was modest at 1.8° ± 6.7° (p = 0.025), whereas TLL increased by 4.3° ± 9.6° (p < 0.001). The anteroposterior position of the cage, approach, level of surgery, and use of a bilateral facetectomy did not significantly affect postoperative LL.

CONCLUSIONS

Following a single-level TLIF procedure using a bullet-shaped cage, the intraoperative improvement in SLL is largely lost after ambulation. The improvement in TLL over time is probably due to the decompression part of the procedure. The approach, level of surgery, bilateral facetectomy, and position of the cage do not seem to have a significant effect on LL achieved postoperatively.

ABBREVIATIONS LL = lumbar lordosis; PI = pelvic incidence; SLL = segmental LL; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; TLL = total LL.

Article Information

Correspondence Khalid M. I. Salem: Blusson Spinal Cord Center, Vancouver, BC, Canada. khalid.salem@nuh.nhs.uk.

INCLUDE WHEN CITING Published online February 16, 2018; DOI: 10.3171/2017.8.SPINE161231.

Disclosures C.G.F. is a consultant for Medtronic and NuVasive. He receives royalties from Medtronic as well as fellowship program support that is paid by Medtronic to his institution. He also receives fellowship program support that is paid by AOSpine to his institution. He receives grant funding from OREF that is paid to his institution.

© AANS, except where prohibited by US copyright law.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    Calculating the PI and SLL. Lines marked with an a were used to measure SLL, and lines marked with a b were used to measure the PI.

  • View in gallery

    Calculating the position of the cage within the disc space. The cage position relative to the rostral endplate was calculated as (ab/ac) × 100, and the cage position relative to the caudal endplate was calculated as (fe/fd) × 100.

  • View in gallery

    The change in SLL. Stars represent a statistically significant change. Figure is available in color online only.

  • View in gallery

    The change in TLL. The star represents a statistically significant change. Figure is available in color online only.

References

1

Faundez AAMehbod AAWu CWu WPloumis ATransfeldt EE: Position of interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: effect on 3-dimensional stability and sagittal lumbar contour. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:1751802008

2

Jagannathan JSansur CAOskouian RJ JrFu KMShaffrey CI: Radiographic restoration of lumbar alignment after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 64:9559642009

3

Kida KTadokoro NKumon MIkeuchi MKawazoe TTani T: Can cantilever transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (C-TLIF) maintain segmental lordosis for degenerative spondylolisthesis on a long-term basis? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:3113152014

4

Kim SBJeon TSHeo YMLee WSYi JWKim TK: Radiographic results of single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar spine disease: focusing on changes of segmental lordosis in fusion segment. Clin Orthop Surg 1:2072132009

5

Kwon BKBerta SDaffner SDVaccaro ARHilibrand ASGrauer JN: Radiographic analysis of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:4694762003

6

Lee YSKim YBPark SWChung C: Comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with direct lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56:4694742014

7

Ould-Slimane MLenoir TDauzac CRillardon LHoffmann EGuigui P: Influence of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures on spinal and pelvic parameters of sagittal balance. Eur Spine J 21:120012062012

8

Sembrano JNYson SCHorazdovsky RDSantos ERPolly DW Jr: Radiographic comparison of lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional fusion approaches: analysis of sagittal contour change. Int J Spine Surg 9:162015

9

Shen XWang LZhang HGu XGu GHe S: Radiographic analysis of one-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases. Clin Spine Surg 29:E1E82016

10

Takahashi THanakita JWatanabe MKawaoka TTakebe NKitahara T: Lumbar alignment and clinical outcome after single level asymmetrical transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis with local coronal imbalance. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 54:6916972014

11

Wiltse LLSpencer CW: New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:6967061988

12

Yson SCSantos ERSembrano JNPolly DW Jr: Segmental lumbar sagittal correction after bilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 17:37422012

TrendMD

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 5 5 5
Full Text Views 26 26 23
PDF Downloads 108 108 83
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0

PubMed

Google Scholar