This site uses cookies, tags, and tracking settings to store information that help give you the very best browsing experience. Dismiss this warning

A comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrices with and without human mesenchymal stem cells in a rodent spinal fusion model

Tetsuo Hayashi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Labour Health and Welfare Organization, Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan;

Search for other papers by Tetsuo Hayashi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Elizabeth L. Lord Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Elizabeth L. Lord in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Akinobu Suzuki Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Akinobu Suzuki in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Shinji Takahashi Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Shinji Takahashi in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
,
Trevor P. Scott Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Trevor P. Scott in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Kevin Phan Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Kevin Phan in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Haijun Tian Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

Search for other papers by Haijun Tian in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Michael D. Daubs Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada; and

Search for other papers by Michael D. Daubs in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
,
Keiichiro Shiba Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Japan Labour Health and Welfare Organization, Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan;

Search for other papers by Keiichiro Shiba in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD, PhD
, and
Jeffrey C. Wang Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Search for other papers by Jeffrey C. Wang in
jns
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
 MD
Restricted access

Purchase Now

USD  $45.00

Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $392.00

JNS + Pediatrics + Spine - 1 year subscription bundle (Individuals Only)

USD  $636.00
USD  $45.00
USD  $392.00
USD  $636.00
Print or Print + Online Sign in

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of some demineralized bone matrix (DBM) substances has been demonstrated in the spinal fusion of rats; however, no previous comparative study has reported the efficacy of DBM with human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). There is an added cost to the products with stem cells, which should be justified by improved osteogenic potential. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare the fusion rates of 3 different commercially available DBM substances, both with and without hMSCs.

METHODS

Posterolateral fusion was performed in 32 mature athymic nude rats. Three groups of 8 rats were implanted with 1 of 3 DBMs: Trinity Evolution (DBM with stem cells), Grafton (DBM without stem cells), or DBX (DBM without stem cells). A fourth group with no implanted material was used as a control group. Radiographs were obtained at 2, 4, and 8 weeks. The rats were euthanized at 8 weeks. Overall fusion was determined by manual palpation and micro-CT.

RESULTS

The fusion rates at 8 weeks on the radiographs for Trinity Evolution, Grafton, and DBX were 8 of 8 rats, 3 of 8 rats, and 5 of 8 rats, respectively. A significant difference was found between Trinity Evolution and Grafton (p = 0.01). The overall fusion rates as determined by micro-CT and manual palpation for Trinity Evolution, Grafton, and DBX were 4 of 8 rats, 3 of 8 rats, and 3 of 8 rats, respectively. The Trinity Evolution substance had the highest overall fusion rate, however no significant difference was found between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacies of these DBM substances are demonstrated; however, the advantage of DBM with hMSCs could not be found in terms of posterolateral fusion. When evaluating spinal fusion using DBM substances, CT analysis is necessary in order to not overestimate fusion.

ABBREVIATIONS

DBM = demineralized bone matrix; hMSC = human mesenchymal stem cell.
  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • 1

    Ad Hoc Working Party on Biotechnology/Pharmacy: Validation of virus removal and inactivation procedures. Pharmacol Toxicol 69:144148, 1991

  • 2

    Aghdasi B, , Montgomery SR, , Daubs MD, & Wang JC: A review of demineralized bone matrices for spinal fusion: the evidence for efficacy. Surgeon 11:3948, 2013

  • 3

    Bae H, , Zhao L, , Zhu D, , Kanim LE, , Wang JC, & Delamarter RB: Variability across ten production lots of a single demineralized bone matrix product. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:427435, 2010

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    Barbanti Brodano G, , Mazzoni E, , Tognon M, , Griffoni C, & Manfrini M: Human mesenchymal stem cells and biomaterials interaction: a promising synergy to improve spine fusion. Eur Spine J 21:Suppl 1 S3S9, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5

    Johnson JS, , Meliton V, , Kim WK, , Lee KB, , Wang JC, & Nguyen K, et al.: Novel oxysterols have pro-osteogenic and anti-adipogenic effects in vitro and induce spinal fusion in vivo. J Cell Biochem 112:16731684, 2011

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 6

    Kim HS, , Viggeswarapu M, , Boden SD, , Liu Y, , Hair GA, & Louis-Ugbo J, et al.: Overcoming the immune response to permit ex vivo gene therapy for spine fusion with human type 5 adenoviral delivery of the LIM mineralization protein-1 cDNA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:219226, 2003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7

    Le Blanc K, , Tammik C, , Rosendahl K, , Zetterberg E, & Ringdén O: HLA expression and immunologic properties of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Hematol 31:890896, 2003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 8

    Lee YP, , Jo M, , Luna M, , Chien B, , Lieberman JR, & Wang JC: The efficacy of different commercially available demineralized bone matrix substances in an athymic rat model. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:439444, 2005

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9

    Miyazaki M, , Morishita Y, , He W, , Hu M, , Sintuu C, & Hymanson HJ, et al.: A porcine collagen-derived matrix as a carrier for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 enhances spinal fusion in rats. Spine J 9:2230, 2009

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10

    Montgomery SR, , Nargizyan T, , Meliton V, , Nachtergaele S, , Rohatgi R, & Stappenbeck F, et al.: A novel osteogenic oxysterol compound for therapeutic development to promote bone growth: activation of hedgehog signaling and osteogenesis through smoothened binding. J Bone Miner Res 29:18721885, 2014

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    Niemeyer P, , Krause U, , Kasten P, , Kreuz PC, , Henle P, & Südkam NP, et al.: Mesenchymal stem cell-based HLA-independent cell therapy for tissue engineering of bone and cartilage. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 1:2127, 2006

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 12

    Park BW, , Kang EJ, , Byun JH, , Son MG, , Kim HJ, & Hah YS, et al.: In vitro and in vivo osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells derived from skin, bone marrow and dental follicle tissues. Differentiation 83:249259, 2012

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 13

    Peterson B, , Whang PG, , Iglesias R, , Wang JC, & Lieberman JR: Osteoinductivity of commercially available demineralized bone matrix. Preparations in a spine fusion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:22432250, 2004

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    Schimandle JH, & Boden SD: Spine update. The use of animal models to study spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:19982006, 1994

  • 15

    Silber JS, , Anderson DG, , Daffner SD, , Brislin BT, , Leland JM, & Hilibrand AS, et al.: Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:134139, 2003

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16

    Wang JC, , Alanay A, , Mark D, , Kanim LE, , Campbell PA, & Dawson EG, et al.: A comparison of commercially available demineralized bone matrix for spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 16:12331240, 2007

    • Crossref
    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 68 68 20
Full Text Views 1373 141 0
PDF Downloads 1125 120 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0