The authors undertook this study to document the clinical outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy, a minimally invasive decompressive surgical technique using spinal endoscopy for lumbar decompression, in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
A total of 366 patients were enrolled in the study and underwent microendoscopic laminotomy between 2007 and 2010. Indications for surgery were single- or double-level LSS, persistent neurological symptoms, and failure of conservative treatment. Microendoscopy provided wide visualization through oblique lenses and allowed bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach, through partial resection of the base of the spinous process, thereby preserving the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and contralateral musculature. Clinical symptoms and signs of low-back pain were evaluated prior to and following surgical intervention by applying the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). These items were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.
Effective circumferential decompression was achieved in all patients. The 2-year follow-up evaluation was completed for 310 patients (148 men and 162 women; mean age 68.7 years). The average recovery rate based on the JOA score was 61.3%. The overall results were excellent in 34.9% of the patients, good in 34.9%, fair in 21.7%, and poor in 8.5%. The mean RMDQ score significantly improved from 11.3 to 4.8 (p < 0.001). In all categories of both JOABPEQ and SF-36, scores at 2 years' follow-up were significantly higher than those obtained before surgery (p < 0.001). Twelve surgery-related complications were identified: dural tear (6 cases [1.9%]), wrong-level operation (1 [0.3%]), transient neuralgia (4 [1.3%]), and infection (1 [0.3%]). All patients recovered, and there were no serious postoperative complications.
Microendoscopic laminotomy is a safe and very effective minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of degenerative LSS.
Abbreviations used in this paper:JOA = Japanese Orthopaedic Association; JOABPEQ = JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire; LSS = lumbar spinal stenosis; RMDQ = Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire; SF-36 = 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Address correspondence to: Akihito Minamide, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama City, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan. email: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Please include this information when citing this paper: published online October 4, 2013; DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13125.
FischgrundJSMackayMHerkowitzHNBrowerRMontgomeryDMKurzLT: 1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)22:2807–28121997
FukuiMChibaKKawakamiMKikuchiSKonnoSMiyamotoM: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale: Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Japan. J Orthop Sci13:173–1792008
HerkowitzHNKurzLT: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am73:802–8081991
JönssonBAnnertzMSjöbergCStrömqvistB: A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: Clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)22:2932–29371997
KaitoTHosonoNMukaiYMakinoTFujiTYonenobuK: Induction of early degeneration of the adjacent segment after posterior lumbar interbody fusion by excessive distraction of lumbar disc space. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine12:671–6792010
KornblumMBFischgrundJSHerkowitzHNAbrahamDABerkowerDLDitkoffJS: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)29:726–7342004
LiaoJCChenWJChenLHNiuCCKeorochanaG: Surgical outcomes of degenerative spondylolisthesis with L5-S1 disc degeneration: comparison between lumbar floating fusion and lumbosacral fusion at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)36:1600–16072011
MatsumotoMHasegawaTItoMAizawaTKonnoSYamagataM: Incidence of complications associated with spinal endoscopic surgery: nationwide survey in 2007 by the Committee on Spinal Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification of Japanese Orthopaedic Association. J Orthop Sci15:92–962010
OhtoriSItoTYamashitaMMurataYMorinagaTHirayamaJ: Evaluation of low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire for lumbar spinal disease in a multicenter study: differences in scores based on age, sex, and type of disease. J Orthop Sci15:86–912010
YoshidaMUeyoshiAMaioKKawaiMNakagawaYSurgical procedures and clinical results of endoscopic decompression for lumbar canal stenosis. DezawaAChenPQChungJY: State of the Art for Minimally Invasive Spine SurgeryTokyoSpringer-Verlag2005. 15–24